Strong signal from Ferrite

[Esteban]

No, if it is harmonic of the frequency that excite the target
Regards

With an oscillator I made, at 300 Khz tends to detect aliminium foil, but a lowest frequency no.

[Theseus]

Hi.
I Regard Carl..... BUT
What about a lot of coins (hundrends) that i found with LRL or LRL and generator ?????? What about bigger objects that i found ????
What says Carl ????
Carl speak about his experiments and i believe him. But i speak about my experiment and the results are different from Carl.
So i write about me and not what i read!!!!
Regards

If an LRL actually works, would it not have to be operator independent? I would certainly think so. Similar to an ohmmeter. If several different individuals were asked to measure the same 100 ohm resistor with the same ohmmeter, we would expect all the readings to be very very close to one another.

If I understand you correctly, if both you and Carl tested (experimented) with exactly the same LRL, you are saying it would work for you but not for Carl.

Why do you suppose that would be?

[Dell Winders]

In normal service, since when is an ohmmeter considered totally operator Independent? Get real.

If I understand you correctly, if both you and Carl tested (experimented) with exactly the same LRL, you are saying it would work for you but not for Carl.

Not if one operated with a dead battery, or one was being untruthful serving the Skeptic agenda, or one was an idiot. Dell

[Theseus]

In normal service, since when is an ohmmeter considered totally operator Independent? Get real.

Sorry, I forgot to take into account your relative intelligence level, and that of a sack of rocks. You are right; if you were operating the ohmmeter it might not be operator independent.

Not if one operated with a dead battery, or one was being untruthful serving the Skeptic agenda, or one was an idiot. Dell

(See above.........) Are you inferring that when Carl tests an LRL, he uses a dead battery in the device, or has a bias towards making it look like the LRL didn't work, when actually it did????

[Dell Winders]

The only possible way you could make a case for libel is if you could prove LRL/MFD actually worked better than Chance guessing. And, you can't (or won't) do that, so..... case closed, end of story

Theseus (Sam), You can express personal opinions about products all you want, if stated as such, however you cross the legal line when you make false, accusations of fraud against Tim Williams, & Dell Winders.

When you cowardly hide behind a continuance of aliases and random Isp, and spread malicious lies, with a venomous tongue it is you who is guilty of fraud, deception, and libel.

Come out from hiding from authorities, be a man, SHOW PROOF THAT BACK YOUR STUPID LIBELOUS ALLEGATIONS. And remember, Carl, is legally responsible for the content of this forum, and your libelous allegations.

The internet, is better policed, and it's harder for you hide under false pretenses. Sam, (Theseus) your vindictive days of seeking egotistical revenge against Dell Winders & Tim Williams, are over.

SHOW PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS AGAINST TIM WILLIAMS, & DELL WINDERS, or go back into hiding and start yourself a new life. Dell

[Theseus]

Theseus (Sam), You can express personal opinions about products all you want....
(other nonsense clipped)
Dell

Sorry, I don't have a clue what you are talking about, and I'm guessing neither do you. I'm not your long lost buddy. You and Tim apparently have some long-standing problem (or vendetta) against someone in your past. I certainly hope you can resolve your differences. You both seem to be quite worked up about something.

As for me, I will continue to make input here as I see fit, or until I'm requested to do otherwise by an administrator, certainly not at your request.

[Fred]

In normal service, since when is an ohmmeter considered totally operator Independent? Get real.

Looks like Hung´s measurements
Now i have to retest all my resitors several times and average the readings to get a almost-real value...

[Dell Winders]

As for me, I will continue to make input here as I see fit, or until I'm requested to do otherwise by an administrator, certainly not at your request

Apparently, you don't see fit to demonstrate any credibility behind your accusations. It's all BS.

SHOW PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AGAINST TIM WILLIAMS, & DELL WINDERS.

I'm sure viewers here would be interested. Dell

[Theseus]

Apparently, you don't see fit to demonstrate any credibility behind your accusations. It's all BS.

SHOW PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AGAINST TIM WILLIAMS, & DELL WINDERS.

I'm sure viewers here would be interested. Dell

Coming from The King of BS, I find your remarks most laughable!

You have provided all the proof I could ever come up with. Don't forget it is you that is attempting to sell the over-priced paint roller handle; and trying to convince the gullible that it will point to treasure. I guess that's why you are The King of BS, and I'm just a lowly contributor to the forum.

[Dell Winders]

Theseus, SHOW PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AGAINST TIM WILLIAMS, & DELL WINDERS.

[Esteban]

With an oscillator I made, at 300 Khz tends to detect aliminium foil, but a lowest frequency no.

aliminium = aluminium
a lowest = at lowest

[gwzd]

Theseus, SHOW PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AGAINST TIM WILLIAMS, & DELL WINDERS.

Dell and Tim,
I don't think Theseus is calling you names, he is simply asking for proof of your statements. I think is a reasonable thing to ask given the weight and the possible enormous amount of applications that your devices would have. That is, if you can provide a mean to learn how to use the technology, we are not talking here about art or religion, are we?. A user manual with detailed instructions would be highly appreciated, but it has to work at least 80% of the time.

I commented to a friend of mine in the local university about your claims and he reply with a link he got while visiting a Baltic country.
Here is the link:

http://www.geo.lt/Earths_fields.pdf

By the way, he knows who you are Dell, because he was involved in the Zond12C project, and you know exactly what am I talking about, right?

Please check the link, some articles are in Russian, but mostly in English. My friend also promised to find a book about an experiment in the Karsluhe university in Germany, they had more than 500 dowsers there doing a blind test with all sorts of objects. I'll be glad to post it somewhere so it can be accessible, perhaps somebody here has heard about it and can help with that. It is not the 1000 that you requested Tim, but still a measurable amount and a respected university.

This is not to fuel up your controversy, but to give you some hints on the fact that beside your own opinions there are other people interested in the subject as well. It would be wise to check out some other opinions before jumping into conclusions, after all for a science or technology to be a science or a technology the results ought to be predictable, right?
Regards,

[Geo]

With an oscillator I made, at 300 Khz tends to detect aliminium foil, but a lowest frequency no.

Hi Esteban. Yes you have right for 300 Khz. No good for gold. But try 4.93 Mhz or 9.86 Mhz !!!!!
You will remember me
regards

[Geo]

If an LRL actually works, would it not have to be operator independent? I would certainly think so. Similar to an ohmmeter. If several different individuals were asked to measure the same 100 ohm resistor with the same ohmmeter, we would expect all the readings to be very very close to one another.

If I understand you correctly, if both you and Carl tested (experimented) with exactly the same LRL, you are saying it would work for you but not for Carl.

Why do you suppose that would be?

Hehe .... you have right from one side !!!! LRL dont work as a ohmmeter or as a TV. LRL are not sure 100% every time with every weather.....
But LRL is (maybe) the only way if you want to find objects from long distance. One time you maybe locate the targets and the other no... but what other to do???? there is not other way.
Now about Carl and me... If we will work with generator then i believe that we will have the same results (same freq and same rods), but if we will work only with rods , then the results will be deferent

[Qiaozhi]

Looks like Hung´s measurements
Now i have to retest all my resitors several times and average the readings to get a almost-real value...

If you test all your resistors yourself, then the results will be the same. You need to get all your friends round, and ask them to measure all the resistors ... then you can average the readings.
Don't forget to use double-blind testing though, otherwise someone who can read resistor color codes could unconsciously affect the results.