Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IONIZATION CHAMBERS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    "Work" made man from an ape - shortest definition

    Just passing, dont worry. Wanted just to say HELLO to old friends here
    So... HELLO!
    Silence is wisdom...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by roberts View Post
      "Work" made man from an ape - shortest definition

      Just passing, dont worry. Wanted just to say HELLO to old friends here
      So... HELLO!
      Hi Roberts!

      As you can see ... nothing changes.
      The same old arguments are going on here.

      Comment


      • #18
        Hi Robert!

        I see you too have not changed

        Any treasure?

        Regards,
        Fred.

        Comment


        • #19
          Hi Robert.

          Originally Posted by Carl-NC
          Remember that ions are atoms or molecules, not radiation, and can't pass through solid objects (like the Mineoro "ion chamber" ).
          - Carl
          Almost in the dawn of 2009 and you still can't figure how the Mineoro's ionic chamber work.

          I rest my case.
          To hung, and others chasing the Ion trail. I have tested and used most imaginable LRL's in the field, totally electronic (no Rods), and with Rods, as well as hundreds of non-electronic devices. NONE that I have used, except Mineoro, have an Ion chamber. Yet all the others I have used without an Ion chamber respond to the same fields, same locations, same depths, in an identical manner as the Mineoro, but at a fraction of the cost. Even the physics limitations are the same when compared side by side. So, why is this?

          I haven't said anything in the past because my humble 6th grade education is no match for the perceived credibility of a person formally educated in Physics, and Electronics, with financial status.

          I won't be responding to argument, or debate to the prejudice of this forum, but only providing my personal field experience with LRL, and suggesting to experimenters that pursuing the Ion concept may be a distraction from the actual physics being employed.

          Happy Holidays to all. Dell
          "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
            NONE that I have used, except Mineoro, have an Ion chamber. Yet all the others I have used without an Ion chamber respond to the same fields, same locations, same depths, in an identical manner as the Mineoro, but at a fraction of the cost. Even the physics limitations are the same when compared side by side.
            Well - I cannot argue with that statement ... although my interpretation of the meaning is probably different.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
              ...Yet all the others I have used without an Ion chamber respond to the same fields,
              Hi,
              What fields is that?
              Regards,
              Fred.

              Comment


              • #22
                Target "fields"
                "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

                Comment


                • #23
                  target

                  Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                  Target "fields"
                  Ok Deli what I want ot know is what the target Fields are.
                  What I want to do is detect them.
                  AF,rf,etc....what is it.
                  THAT IS THE FIRST STEP TO MAKING A DETECTOR IS TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DETECTING?

                  SO I AM STARTING AT THE SIGNAL FIRST.

                  WHY CAN'T PEOPLE LIKE CARL OR ME UNDERSTAND THIS SIGNAL OR DETECT IT.

                  NO ONE I KNOW CAN DETECT IT.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    WHY CAN'T PEOPLE LIKE CARL OR ME UNDERSTAND THIS SIGNAL OR DETECT IT.
                    Whew! That's a baited question. I certainly can't answer for you, but it's obvious that Carl, is capable of detecting at least some target fields, but can't admit it for for all the lie's he's perpetrated, and libelous damage he has caused in support of the Skeptic agenda.

                    NO ONE I KNOW CAN DETECT IT
                    According to the posts, It appears there are numbers of people who have attempted to participate honestly on this forum that have, and are detecting the emanating "fields" of metal targets by various means. "What has been done, can be done".

                    Here's a suggestion to get you started.
                    Iron concentrates a strong "field". Learn to detect the emanating "field" of Iron, then keep increasing your sensitivity until you are able to detect, and discriminate the emanating "field" of other elements.

                    I have a December 17 deadline to have pre-paid back orders ready for shipment, so I don't have time to continue posting.

                    It's your choice to do experimenting and field testing to learn on your own, but with the disrespect and attitude you have shown, don't expect anyone but Estaban's, kind generosity to hand you the years of knowledge on a Silver platter.

                    Happy Holidays! Dell
                    "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                      Target "fields"
                      Well i know it´s "target fields" and not football fields , but if you say they are all same fields you should know what they are (you know, what specie) or else , how could you know they are the same kind?
                      Thus my question : what are they.For me it´s THE big question.
                      I hope i was clear enought

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                        Yet all the others I have used without an Ion chamber respond to the same fields, same locations, same depths, in an identical manner as the Mineoro, but at a fraction of the cost.
                        Your dowsing rods beep?

                        Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                        but it's obvious that Carl, is capable of detecting at least some target fields, but can't admit it for for all the lie's he's perpetrated, and libelous damage he has caused in support of the Skeptic agenda.
                        10 years of making this claim and you still can't name a single example.

                        - Carl

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                          but it's obvious that Carl, is capable of detecting at least some target fields, but can't admit it for for all the lie's he's perpetrated, and libelous damage he has caused in support of the Skeptic agenda.

                          Dell
                          Dell, you hit a nerve here. I agree 100% with you as I always stated that also in the past.

                          A person who owns the FG80 and (apparently) refuses to go in the field to detect gold (and) claims the detector does not work (pure joke), in a minimum chance, must think all this forum is made of idiotic people to believe this is so.
                          "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by hung View Post
                            Dell, you hit a nerve here. I agree 100% with you as I always stated that also in the past.

                            A person who owns the FG80 and (apparently) refuses to go in the field to detect gold (and) claims the detector does not work (pure joke), in a minimum chance, must think all this forum is made of idiotic people to believe this is so.

                            You're correct for once. Dell did hit a nerve ... the ulnar nerve. In other words - the funny bone!!

                            The FG80 is a joke. But, coming from someone who actually takes the RangerTell Examiner seriously, your comments are not surprising. Your credibility (if you ever had any) is close to absolute zero.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by hung View Post
                              Dell, you hit a nerve here. I agree 100% with you as I always stated that also in the past.

                              A person who owns the FG80 and (apparently) refuses to go in the field to detect gold (and) claims the detector does not work (pure joke), in a minimum chance, must think all this forum is made of idiotic people to believe this is so.
                              Oh yeah... there's a a field around the target...the target's field... usually is like this!

                              What a discovery!
                              Attached Files

                              "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
                              But we dont need a reason
                              "

                              someone said...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Max
                                Oh yeah... there's a a field around the target...the target's field... usually is like this!

                                What a discovery!
                                Ummmm... So what did they discover? Corn?

                                Best wishes,
                                J_P

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X