One more to prove the concept

[Qiaozhi]

.................................................. .................................................. .

No there will be no posts later at this stage. My hols are over. However I have failed to enter the PSS:

PSS: When I said this is surface or near surface I meant the picking of gold grains. The concept applies to great depth of course, and distance. (tens of feet and hundreds of feet/meters respectively)

Thanks for allowing me to arrange a replacement. Some others live in hope now and CC may even get one some day. The better the sales, the more older units may become available.

.................................................. .................................................. ..
"The moving finger writes..and having writ..moves on!

Unfortunately for you, you arrived on this forum at a bad time. We experienced some problems with hackers over the Christmas period, and consequently Geotech was moved to a new server. Since then we have clamped down heavily on spammers, duplicate user names, and anyone making a nuisance of themselves.

The Remote Sensing section is the most relaxed forum on Geotech, with regard to the rules. But - if you are a purveyor of LRLs and/or dowsing contraptions (often referred to here as "wallet-miners") then you have to learn to take the flak (Flugabwehrkanone). Both Dell and Hung have become adept at this over time.

If you do decide to stick around, then please refrain from using such terms as "meathead, dishonest, uncouth moron and monkey", as you did earlier.

None of our skeptical comments are meant to be personal, but we do like to say what we think.
Let's hope that CC actually receives a replacement Examiner. You could gain some brownie points if this ever happens.

[Theseus]

Thanks for allowing me to arrange a replacement. Some others live in hope now and CC may even get one some day. The better the sales, the more older units may become available.

You know J_Player, I really liked your proposal to Vincent Blanes, and was hoping you could arrange getting the unit to test.

However, I was also aware that NO semi-successful Wallet-miner would EVER take part in a real test of his wares. So, in that regard, I merely stepped back and kept track of how long... and how many posts it would take for Vincent to avoid sending you CC's replacement dowsing contraption.

Notice, from his final(?) remarks above that he has avoided sending you a unit for test and has now retracted his promise to send CC a replacement by saying; "..CC may even get one some day".

What a dance step Mr. Blanes has demonstrated.... wouldn't you say?

Spoken like the true Wallet-miner he is!

[hung]

.................................................. .................................................. ....

What a shame. It only takes a minute to prove it (literally).

With me it took only 25 seconds. Well, including the time to hit the numbers in the calculator.


There's the Examiner Voltage Report I wrote in this forum somewhere last year maybe, so:
To the non-skeptics (skeptics are hopeless);

RTFVR!

Or.. Read The F... Voltage Report!

Good luck on your ventures RT!

[Qiaozhi]

With me it took only 25 seconds. Well, including the time to hit the numbers in the calculator.

In fact, it took even less time than that!
It was the moment you opened your wallet at time=0.

[Theseus]

To the non-skeptics (skeptics are hopeless);

Hopeless? I don't think so, but they are ever vigilant and persistent and obviously keep getting in the way of, and thwarting Wallet-miners.

[Carl-NC]

If this is a spoof article...

Yes, it is a spoof article.

Carl said sub-atomic. He meant microscopic.

No, I meant sub-atomic, as in "smaller than atoms." This is part of the joke. I guess I should add that, "you can use a small 1TeV supercollider to verify the presence of sub-atomic gold." Would that make it more obvious?

The crux of this matter is that the article is a spoof. I say no and challenge you to quote me a line that disproves this.

How about this line: "The article is a spoof." You can quote me on that.

- Carl

[Fred]

This is crazy. Carl has to explain a joke article he has written is actually a joke article , because someone is so used to BS that he believes it (or pretend to ).

I want ot get out from the twilight zone,how can i do it ?

I miss the real world...the one where things really exists and can be proven.

[Dell Winders]

[QUOTE] Since then we have clamped down heavily on spammers, duplicate user names, and anyone making a nuisance of themselves./QUOTE]

Now that's the biggest joke I have seen on here.

LOOK you can see all the great spoofers, spammers, and nusciances are still posting.
Qiaozhi
Carl
Jplayer
Theseus

You scientific pretenders are the most ridiculous clowns on the internet.
Excuse me, I'm laughing so hard I can't type. It's going to take me a while to stop laughing at you jokes. Dell

[Theseus]

Scientific Pretender - a clear Definition

Dell Winders was recently amused (perhaps to the point of wetting himself) by his term; Scientific Pretender

Being able to laugh at one's self is no doubt excellent therapy, Dell, and I commend you for not taking yourself too seriously, but are able to accurately look yourself in the mirror and make an honest assessment of your own reflection.

With that in mind; and if there was a Dictionary of definitions for those folks who join two or more single words together, I'm certain that not only would your name be mentioned as a Scientific Pretender, but the definition would probably be as follows:

sci·en·tif·ic pre·tend·er ~

a person who professes scientific sounding beliefs and opinions that he does not hold, or understand the meaning of, in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives. Synonyms; see Dell Winders, Wallet-miner, hot-melt glue gun, do-nothing electronic components and paint-roller handle

Let's all join Dell in a great laugh -

[Qiaozhi]

It's going to take me a while to stop laughing ... Dell

I am flattered that you rate us so highly in the amusement stakes. Personally I would have thought your occasional trips to the bank were at the top of the list ... as in "laughing all the way to...".

[Steve in MS]

With me it took only 25 seconds. Well, including the time to hit the numbers in the calculator.


There's the Examiner Voltage Report I wrote in this forum somewhere last year maybe, so:
To the non-skeptics (skeptics are hopeless);

RTFVR!

Or.. Read The F... Voltage Report!

Good luck on your ventures RT!

Hung, show us some pictures of what you have found with your Ranger.

[Qiaozhi]

This is crazy. Carl has to explain a joke article he has written is actually a joke article , because someone is so used to BS that he believes it (or pretend to ).

I want ot get out from the twilight zone,how can i do it ?

I miss the real world...the one where things really exists and can be proven.

This reminds me of "Alternative 3", which was an April Fool's spoof documentary aired in 1977. Although it was clearly a spoof, several technically challenged individuals thought it was real. Even today there are people who deny the reality of the situation.
You can read about it here ->

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_3

and you can download it from here ->

http://www.torrentportal.com/details/3866747/Alternative+Three.html

It's well worth watching.

[J_Player]

LOOK you can see all the great spoofers, spammers, and nusciances are still posting.
Qiaozhi
Carl
Jplayer
Theseus

How interesting...
You consider spoofers, spammers, and nuisances to be the same people who speak up when they think you are full of BS. Aren't these the same people who want to see you show a live demonstration of a single one of your LRLs working to recover treasure?

So what is the reason why you refuse to give a live demonstration?

Opps... Wait, I remember...
You did give a live demonstration of locating coins at a beach. You failed miserably, then called the testing organization spokesman a liar when he said you failed. You also refused to take a re-test to prove him wrong... http://www.randi.org/jr/200511/112505psychich.html#i5


This makes me wonder....
If you continue to sell your LRLs and refuse to demonstrate a single one of them working, then who is supposed to believe they work?
Exceptionally stupid people?
The same people who believe you really passed the test for finding coins on the beach, even though the testing organization says you failed, and you still refuse to take a retest to prove them wrong?
The same people who believe everything they read on your advertising page while knowing you refuse to show your LRLs actually doing what the page shows?

I guess I am not one of those people.
I hope what I just posted does not make me a spoofer, spammer, and nuisance.
Hmmm.... Well maybe a nuisance to you.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Carl-NC]

Dell, have you actually seen any recovered treasure that was found using an LRL built from my posted design? Or were you posting hearsay & speculation?

[Dell Winders]

How interesting...
You consider spoofers, spammers, and nuisances to be the same people who speak up when they think you are full of BS. Aren't these the same people who want to see you show a live demonstration of a single one of your LRLs working to recover treasure?

So what is the reason why you refuse to give a live demonstration?

Opps... Wait, I remember...
You did give a live demonstration of locating coins at a beach. You failed miserably, then called the testing organization spokesman a liar when he said you failed. You also refused to take a re-test to prove him wrong... http://www.randi.org/jr/200511/112505psychich.html#i5


This makes me wonder....
If you continue to sell your LRLs and refuse to demonstrate a single one of them working, then who is supposed to believe they work?
Exceptionally stupid people?
The same people who believe you really passed the test for finding coins on the beach, even though the testing organization says you failed, and you still refuse to take a retest to prove them wrong?
The same people who believe everything they read on your advertising page while knowing you refuse to show your LRLs actually doing what the page shows?

I guess I am not one of those people.
I hope what I just posted does not make me a spoofer, spammer, and nuisance.

OOPS! Did I forget to mention liars?

I have never claimed I passed Randi's test, only that he conducted it. In fact, Randi's own words in front of witness were, More testing would have to be done before any conclusions could be made. Dell