Texas Treasure Show

[Theseus]

What you prbably(sic) will refuse to see is that the human consciousness can affect the shape of the aura.

Hold onto your ballcap lined with tin foil, because.....

You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone!

I wonder if Rod Serling had a tin-foil cap???

[Qiaozhi]

The RLR requires an imperceptable amount of force to initiate movement (very low start-up torque threshold) and even less to influence it after that point. That's way I say the rod feels like it hits a wall when it tries to cross the edge of the target's field. It doesn't bounce around at that point, it just stops on a nats behind. I mean all you so-called physicists out there must be able to understand this.

That would be true if there was any real science behind the idea of a signal line ... which there is not ... so the highlighted sentence above makes no sense.

What you prbably will refuse to see is that the human consciousness can affect the shape of the aura.

Mind over matter? Again, totally unproven, as is the idea of an "aura".
This way of thinking harks back to early Victorian times and such things as ectoplasm. Or perhaps you think that exists as well?

[Mike(Mont)]

Those who have seen know. Those who have not seen, no amout of proof is sufficient.

As for the astronomical price of $125, go try skiing of golfing for one day. Or a couple boxes of Depends.

[hung]

Mind over matter? Again, totally unproven, as is the idea of an "aura".
This way of thinking harks back to early Victorian times and such things as ectoplasm. Or perhaps you think that exists as well?

Just today I hung in (no pun intended) here and saw the 'atrocity' above you have said.
Normally I would not care to make a coment about that but your stupidity is so gross and grave that I thought about the other serious readers in this forum that could be affected and somehow influenced wrong by such blasfemy.

Firstly, the only one who seem to be in 'Victorian Times' as you said, is yourself who already showed your 16th century scientific knowledge plenty of time.

Which brings of course to my second statement that your 16th century is too much primitive to understand what Aura and ectoplasm are.

And finally, try to keep at least 2% updated with science to know their acomplishments and true data about the Aura and the existence of the spirits before emitting those 'noises'.
Thanks.
*****

Mike, don't throw pearls to the ... you know.
Keep up the good work.
Regards.

[Mike(Mont)]

The reason I said two boxes of Depends is one box for his mouth.

[Qiaozhi]

Which brings of course to my second statement that your 16th century is too much primitive to understand what Aura and ectoplasm are.

Since you used such words as "blasfemy" (sic) - [correct spelling is blasphemy] - this just goes to prove that this dowsing nonsense is an integral part of your belief system, and I seem to have touched a nerve.

And ... you also managed to answer the question I posed to Mike ... you do actually believe in aura and ectoplasm. You are clearly beyond all hope, or should that be 'redemption'.

[Theseus]

Since you used such words as "blafemy" (sic) - [correct spelling is blasphemy] - this just goes to prove that this dowsing nonsense is an integral part of your belief system, and I seem to have touched a nerve.

And ... you also managed to answer the question I posed to Mike ... you do actually believe in aura and ectoplasm. You are clearly beyond all hope, or should that be 'redemption'.

Ever notice how testy they get when backed into a corner by the truth. Kind of like throwing Holy Water on a vampire, or making the Sign of a Cross in front of them - it really must sting.

[Qiaozhi]

Ever notice how testy they get when backed into a corner by the truth. Kind of like throwing Holy Water on a vampire, or making the Sign of a Cross in front of them - it really must sting.

Yes - it's funny how they attempt to use scientific-sounding terms to justify their medieval practices, then accuse the real engineers and scientists of being scientific-pretenders. It makes me laugh every time.

Ouija boards, table tipping, sceances (complete with ectoplasm), magic crystals, copper bracelets (to ward off rheumatism and arthritis), Tarot cards, astrology, homeopathy and dowsing are all relics of the past ... or are they? You only have to look at the back pages of some magazines to know that these outdated ideas are still with us. Will they never learn...? With people like Hung continuing to promote this absurd rubbish, it will probably be with us for many years to come.

[Steve in MS]

Those who have seen know. Those who have not seen, no amout of proof is sufficient.

As for the astronomical price of $125, go try skiing of golfing for one day. Or a couple boxes of Depends.

The trouble is no one has seen but you and your fellow LRL believers.
Even if your instrument will work, how many that buy them will be able to get it to work? Doesn't it take special skills to be successful with one?
How long will it take for someone to aquire such skills, if ever?
What percentage of those who try it will be successful,
80%, 60%, 30%, 20%, or 0%?
I never would be good in sales, there is too much sugar coating or just plain out B.S. going on.
.....For the self deluded, this shouldn't be any problem.

[Dell Winders]

It is definitely a dowsing rod, no doubt about that. Sorry Dell, the Duck Criterion wins again.

If you consider reference to a duck a scientific explanation you are the most ignorant pretend scientist to post such stupidity on the internet.

The question to be answered, was the claimed Dowsing rod (?) being used in a meta-physics application, or a physics application?

There is a huge difference.

You are right, Tim Williams, is a good guy. So am I.

I don't know how you conned Whites, into hiring you, but it's obvious that whatever Kenny, is paying you , he's getting ripped off by a scientific pretender Dell. Quack! Quack!

[Qiaozhi]

The question to be answered, was the claimed Dowsing rod (?) being used in a meta-physics application, or a physics application?

There's no question to be answered here. Dowsing rods "operate" by the ideomotor effect, which is a psychological phenomenon. The only physics involved is related to gravity. Meta-physics explanations are simply nonsense.

Quack! Quack!

The duck has spoken...

[Mike(Mont)]

I said you guys would probably refuse to see. Why should I waste my time trying to explain something you refuse to see? I don't even mean "see" in the visual sense. You can't see consciousness. Go do your own research and practice.

Whether you call the RLR a dowsing rod or locator rod makes no difference to me. I've used it by itself but I most always use it with some type of amplifier or frequency generator because it gives me a much stronger signal.

[Qiaozhi]

And to top it all ... yes , even Hung's nonsense posts ... I've just seen this ->

http://www.orange.co.uk/news/quirkies/default.htm?rm=storyitem&storyId=3256361

Does human stupidity have no bounds?

At least one of the Tory Welsh Assembly members has his head screwed on properly.

[Steve in MS]

I said you guys would probably refuse to see. Why should I waste my time trying to explain something you refuse to see? I don't even mean "see" in the visual sense. You can't see consciousness. Go do your own research and practice.

Whether you call the RLR a dowsing rod or locator rod makes no difference to me. I've used it by itself but I most always use it with some type of amplifier or frequency generator because it gives me a much stronger signal.

Refuse to see what? All we have is your word, it appears since it cannot be proven "visually", something else is involved.
Is LRL a religion or what?
Maybe it's the power of positive thinking.
If belief is all that is necessary, one doesn't need to be hindered by any "physical" apparatus.
Research and practice? Any research ends in no proof and no
real answers from the true believers.

[Dell Winders]

The duck has spoken...

That sure is is one stupid duck. Dell