REAL LRL ???!!!

[vistac2000]

Hi to all friends,

I see and read some LRL posts in this site ...
but I have one question...!!!
Is LRL really works?

If YES please put a good working circuit of LRL ...

Thanks...
best regrads.... vistac2000

[Geo]

Hi to all friends,

I see and read some LRL posts in this site ...
but I have one question...!!!
Is LRL really works?

If YES please put a good working circuit of LRL ...

Thanks...
best regrads.... vistac2000

Hi.
It is not so easy to find a good and practical schematic
Regards

[detectoman]

the lrl are top secret, due to sceptics and chinesse and other comercalizacion, any like to show public you key for put out the gold
you should read inside lines of the treads
but whit your effort can you understand the basic principes
any body true lrlst look to show easy public the product of these own efforce
in the group exist all necesary for the mind dilligent to introduce in this increible field
all came of results of the personal iniciatives, experiments tryes, only bsbs jjaja
find in the lot of tips of group the begin of your dream
is not difficult
best whises

[detectoman]

begin for the simple personal experimentation ionic, zahory or bfio., hibrid, etc lrl work!
little range ( on superficie ) medium range @ 10 mts long range 200 mts

[Theseus]

the lrl are top secret.....

Yes, the LRL are top secret, and for nearly the same reasons as the Philadelphia Experiment is top secret.

What went on during the Philadelphia Experiment must never fall into the hands of the common people. The same is true for revealing the inner workings of actual LRL instruments. Imagine if these top secret LRL schematics were ever to fall into the knowledge base of the common people. Just imagine....

[J_Player]

I see and read some LRL posts in this site ...
but I have one question...!!!
Is LRL really works?

If YES please put a good working circuit of LRL

Hi vistac2000,
I have never seen an LRL work, and I do not believe they work. But some people believe they work.
You can read here for a circuit to build an LRL that some people say works:

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11674&highlight=zahori

Best wishes,
J_P

[zenit52]

Hi friends,
Did someone build a LRL and test it ?
Did LRL realy work???
please share your results...

with best regards... zenit52

[Fred]

Hi friends,

Hi,

Did someone build a LRL and test it ?

Yes i did , the Pistol detector

Did LRL realy work???

No

with best regards... zenit52

Regards

[Esteban]

Hi,

Yes i did , the Pistol detector

No

Regards

Deppend...

[aft_72005]

Hi friends,
Did someone build a LRL and test it ?
Did LRL realy work???
please share your results...

with best regards... zenit52

Hi zenit52
Welcome to LRL world .......................................

Best regards.

[michael]

Hi vistac2000,
I have never seen an LRL work, and I do not believe they work. But some people believe they work.
You can read here for a circuit to build an LRL that some people say works:

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11674&highlight=zahori

Best wishes,
J_P

Hi.
Who has said that Zahori works for treasure finding?
It never can. I tested it and got nothing. It detects electrical lines, power lines as the best. you can even find hidden cables in wall and track it.
even can recognize if in a dark room is any electrical appliance in standby.
it especially detects high voltage lines even from 100 meters.
but about PD; it works for treasure finding, it really works.
I personally experienced this.
when you have not made complete tests at different conditions how can run decisive statements against that????
I can work with LRLs, but each one has it's advantages and disadvantages.
now the best usability of L- rods for me is to determine depth of target reliably but after finding treasure point with my MDL.
as MDL detection is most reliable and quick.
MDL is the best device for either LRLing or pinpointing, but its' disadvantages are: 1- big dimension of 2x2 m loop
and 2- it hits big targets at great depths as if are on surface.
anyway LRLs work but not as being advertised or we expect of a conventional detector. they are relative.
good luck.

[aft_72005]

Hi Michael
Zahori is electrostatic filed detector. As you said also it can detect electrical filed .
Buried metals at very longtime also produced static field. But it is strange ,why
It cannot detect static field from very longtime Buried metals?
Best regards.

[Max]

Deppend...

on what ?

The problem is... there will be always some "detail" claimed to be essential and top-secret that homebrewers here, including me, will not implement (cause will remain top-secret and known just to you, hung, alonso, morgan, homer simpson, jessica rabbit, paris hilton etc ) and you'll say that "depends" cause that detail is mandatory in the lrl-hollywoodland!

I made some stuff also... made zahori and no success. Made PD and no success too. Both were failures but, sure, I didn't implement any top-secret detail!

So IT'S MY FAULT!

Not that devices don't work a crap....

But, I know... now Morgan will ask me again about my PD implementation .... oh God! Where to find it now ??? I don't remember... maybe in some plastic bag I put somewhere...

Kind regards,
Max

[Max]

Hi.
It is not so easy to find a good and practical schematic
Regards

Uhm... ok... but it's not easy cause nobody wanna post it... or just cause it's impossible make any LRL thing that works ?

Good practical schematic is what we need to demonstrate that LRL principles (whatever they are) are not just pure speculation: till now I never see anything similar here... no one single post about a working LRL, easy enough and complete to make some stupid test like detect a coin at a meter distance.... not just one!

SO... considering that here we have a huge number of working schematics of real devices, mds etc... and this is 1st place in the world for such kind of things... I don't understand why we don't have any "easy" testable schematic to work on...

I think it's a trick of mind... it beeps and you think it detected the target.... then you already are in a place RICH of good stuff (and you surely are when testing that things... dear Geo) and so you'll think it's the lrl/pistol or whatever that signals you the place where to dig... you recover something GOOD and think it works for real...

but I think are just coincidences... cause if I go in a RICH place and dig an hole I'll sure find something good... silver, copper, bronze or even gold stuff... no need of a beep beep to do that.

What I said is probably your case, cause I dubt you checked first your soil with conventional MDs (cause lrl fanatics told you don't cause that will "destroy" lrl signal!)

Kind regards,
Max

[Theseus]

Hi Michael
Zahori is electrostatic filed detector. As you said also it can detect electrical filed .
Buried metals at very longtime also produced static field. But it is strange ,why
It cannot detect static field from very longtime Buried metals?
Best regards.

All good facts. There is much to be learned from such simple and concise statements.

Electrostatic detectors work just fine at detecting "real" electrostatic fields. Therefore, it should be no mystery why none of these electrostatic detectors indicate the location of long time buried metals. The correct answer is; there are NO static or electrostatic fields produced by long time buried metals.

There is no mystery, you've solved your own conundrum, accept the answer and move on.