Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer

[Seden]

Oh my Esteban!

Of course, you're not RObert... maybe a copy...



Yep sure is the same M.O. as Robert. Looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck. What else am I to believe here? At least he's not Albanian, we'll give him credit for that!

Randy

[michael]

Hi,
you know PD works ?

Did you find anything with it... or it's just that you think it works but found nothing, actually ?

Have you performed a double-blind test with PD ?

Kind regards, Max

Hi, Yes Max, I'm sure and sure more than what you can imagine.
you point to double blind test, OK, test for what? a fresh buried target? no, this is not the case.
we are talking about treasure, OK? and here in our scope we regard a treasure as a big and very old buried precious metal.
it's entirely different than a fresh small piece buried.
for 3 located points of big treasure here (with our unique PI; MDL) I checked all locations with PD.
I set PD hundreds meters away the locations when reached near them, got clear signal that made it beep crazily.
yes it works, but depends on what you expect; find a lost gold earring, ring, coin,.... or no find a real treasure, yes, a real treasure; trove,..... these behave in another manner.
of course I have previously put some parts of my personal experiences in forum and seems you were ignorant about them
one here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15242 # 10 & 14 and other posts which I don't remember now.
again repeat ; PD is good for monitoring an area and find hot places, but pinpointing is impossible with it especially for big deep treasures.
if you want, can laugh, is up to you.

[Max]

Of course, you're not RObert... maybe a copy...

Not a copy... I have ny own style...

[Max]

Of course, you're not RObert... maybe a copy...



Yep sure is the same M.O. as Robert. Looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck. What else am I to believe here? At least he's not Albanian, we'll give him credit for that!

Randy

Belive what you want. Same rule apply to impossible projects!

[Max]

Hi, Yes Max, I'm sure and sure more than what you can imagine.
you point to double blind test, OK, test for what? a fresh buried target? no, this is not the case.
we are talking about treasure, OK? and here in our scope we regard a treasure as a big and very old buried precious metal.
it's entirely different than a fresh small piece buried.
for 3 located points of big treasure here (with our unique PI; MDL) I checked all locations with PD.
I set PD hundreds meters away the locations when reached near them, got clear signal that made it beep crazily.
yes it works, but depends on what you expect; find a lost gold earring, ring, coin,.... or no find a real treasure, yes, a real treasure; trove,..... these behave in another manner.
of course I have previously put some parts of my personal experiences in forum and seems you were ignorant about them
one here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15242 # 10 & 14 and other posts which I don't remember now.
again repeat ; PD is good for monitoring an area and find hot places, but pinpointing is impossible with it especially for big deep treasures.
if you want, can laugh, is up to you.

Hi,
hmmm... I saw that already I think... but the problem is that you also reported of many failed tests with PD.

You have to consider that people here , like Morgan or Esteban worte about coin detection and small items... posted movies etc so always PD was claimed of detecting also small stuff...

now I read your post and saw just another variation on the theme that made almost impossible for people have a clear idea of how the PD is supposed to work.

You wrote you need large treasure, also long time buried... different from Esteban and Morgan (not to talk of Hung... who clearly detects coins with his burnt PD at miles away! ) that talk of small stuff detection too...

So, how that's possible that PD works for you in a way different from Morgan or Esteban ?

Also, PD was claimed capable of pinpointing targets , like coins or rings but seems you cannot pinpoint treasure and device simply go crazy... BUT if it goes crazy and cannot pinpoint you then used conventional MD to locate the treasure!

So... you know the treasure (or something) was there... cause MD told you... and just trick of the mind happened and when PD start singing you connected that to the treasure there...

I ask... what's usefulness of such a thing if you need MD to locate the treasure ?

Locate hot area maybe ? Are you sure it can really do ?

Kind regards,
Max

[WM6]

Locate hot area maybe ? Are you sure it can really do ?

Max

Sure it can locate hot area, but beed some travel to Africa.
Prety expensice without rich sponsor.

[Fred]

I think can be useful for some thinks...

Interesting.
No relation with MD or LRL or PD , but cool .
Here more info:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-art/357277/6474/Magnetic-resonance-spectrometer

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~derose/labs/exp5.html

Some could put their head inside and try to find anomalies...

[hung]

Dman, Hung, Michael and Jimmy, info was sent.

Thanks friend. You trully are a gentleman.

[Esteban]

Of course, you're not RObert... maybe a copy...



Yep sure is the same M.O. as Robert. Looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck. What else am I to believe here? At least he's not Albanian, we'll give him credit for that!

Randy

A bad copy! RObert is better!

[Esteban]

Interesting.
No relation with MD or LRL or PD , but cool .
Here more info:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-art/357277/6474/Magnetic-resonance-spectrometer

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~derose/labs/exp5.html

Some could put their head inside and try to find anomalies...

Of course, apparently no relation with PD... but you're sure?

[J_Player]

Of course, apparently no relation with PD... but you're sure?

Hi Esteban,
Yes, I am sure.
If you read the articles, they are talking about the methods of measuring the spectrum of nuclear magnetic resonance for different samples placed inside a testing machine. The testing machine will not work without building it to some very close tolerances:

The magnet has been modified and adjusted to produce a highly homogeneous magnetic field over a relatively large volume (~1.5 cm^3) at the center of the gap. This has required using high-purity low-remanence iron for the pole-pieces, and finishing the faces flat to optical tolerances (~1-2 wavelengths). The pole-pieces have not been rigidly attached to the main magnet H-frame, realistic machining tolerances making this impractical. Instead a Neoprene rubber (0.8 mm) spacer has been inserted between each pole-piece and the frame. Careful adjustment of the three fixing screws for each pole-piece varies the compression of the Neoprene so that the pole faces may be adjusted to be precisely parallel, thus maximizing the volume of best field homogeneity. A field homogeneity better than 1 part in 10,000 over a volume of ~2 cm^3 has been achieved.

A sample coil is mounted centrally in the gap of the magnet. A short length of NON-MAGNETIC low-capacity coaxial cable is used for connection to the electronics chassis.

The sample to be tested is inserted between the pole pieces of an electromagnet that has been adjusted by three setscrews to produce an extremely homogenous field in a space of 2 cubic centimeters where the sample is placed.

When reading the text, it became very apparent that this equipment has no bearing on using an antique IB metal detector to find buried treasure, or using a passive ferrite coil with an attached RF detector circuit to locate buried treasure. The articles describe a method to measure the nuclear magnetic resonance of samples placed in a testing machine, not methods to locate hidden samples at long range with receiver coils. And the principle of operation is not related either, as it requires extremely high precision machining as well as adjusting physical dimensions to optical tolerances (1-2 wavelengths) in order to produce a extremely homogeneous magnetic field (better than part 1 in 10,000). Then it requires inserting a sample into this high-precision 2cc field to exhibit precession data when the field is removed.

Do you think any of this is related to the PD?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Esteban]

Hi Esteban,
Yes, I am sure.
If you read the articles, they are talking about the methods of measuring the spectrum of nuclear magnetic resonance for different samples placed inside a testing machine. The testing machine will not work without building it to some very close tolerances:
The sample to be tested is inserted between the pole pieces of an electromagnet that has been adjusted by three setscrews to produce an extremely homogenous field in a space of 2 cubic centimeters where the sample is placed.

When reading the text, it became very apparent that this equipment has no bearing on using an antique IB metal detector to find buried treasure, or using a passive ferrite coil with an attached RF detector circuit to locate buried treasure. The articles describe a method to measure the nuclear magnetic resonance of samples placed in a testing machine, not methods to locate hidden samples at long range with receiver coils. And the principle of operation is not related either, as it requires extremely high precision machining as well as adjusting physical dimensions to optical tolerances (1-2 wavelengths) in order to produce a extremely homogeneous magnetic field (better than part 1 in 10,000). Then it requires inserting a sample into this high-precision 2cc field to exhibit precession data when the field is removed.

Do you think any of this is related to the PD?

Best wishes,
J_P

For example, the MFD by Andy Flind is not for to locate treasure, OK? But with a loop and other few, this do very well, and also demonstrates that this old treasures has a strong energy causes that more one led of bargraph lights!

Regards

Esteban

[Max]

For example, the MFD by Andy Flind is not for to locate treasure, OK? But with a loop and other few, this do very well, and also demonstrates that this old treasures has a strong energy causes that more one led of bargraph lights!

Regards

Esteban

Hi,
you say that this project of Andy Flind modified works as LRL... and nobody else.

But you put that claim (as with others) and then gave no explaination, no modification plans, no testing procedure, nothing...

just claims. As Dell. As Hung. As any other LRL-fanatic but with add of pepper...

same stuff... but you also add some stamp-sized schematics... that's the difference!

That, of course, change totally my point of view about your claims...

Kind regards,
Max

[Max]

Thanks friend. You trully are a gentleman.

You guys understand one each other... the LRL-tribe... chapter-2!

So what ?

Have you a new modified RT-flask to show here ???

Or wanna make debunkering now ???

Still awaiting for the dang debunkering!

Kind regards,
Max

[Esteban]

Hi,
you say that this project of Andy Flind modified works as LRL... and nobody else.

But you put that claim (as with others) and then gave no explaination, no modification plans, no testing procedure, nothing...

just claims. As Dell. As Hung. As any other LRL-fanatic but with add of pepper...

same stuff... but you also add some stamp-sized schematics... that's the difference!

That, of course, change totally my point of view about your claims...

Kind regards,
Max

OK, but what are you doing on private RS forum? Here at eyes of all you are "civilizated", but in other part (more far of criticism by the skepticals) you mantain same hope...