Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

help LRL....???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • help LRL....???

    HI TO ALL:
    I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
    LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
    CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
    WAIT FOR YOU DEARS

  • #2
    Originally posted by ma330 View Post
    HI TO ALL:
    I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
    LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
    CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
    WAIT FOR YOU DEARS
    http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat

    The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

    However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

    Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

    http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat

    Hope this helps....

    The Wallet-Miner's Creed
    Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ma330 View Post
      HI TO ALL:
      I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
      LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
      CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
      WAIT FOR YOU DEARS


      It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

      Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ???

      Kind regards,
      Max

      "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
      But we dont need a reason
      "

      someone said...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Max View Post


        It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

        Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ???

        Kind regards,
        Max
        Very true!

        Before you can provide an answer, you need to define what's meant by "nice working".

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Theseus View Post
          http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat

          The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

          However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

          Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

          http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat

          Hope this helps....
          tank you theseus dear
          i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
          electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
          THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
          please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
          tank you for help

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ma330 View Post
            tank you theseus dear
            i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
            electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
            THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
            please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
            tank you for help
            Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Fred View Post
              Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.
              WHAT??????????????????

              Comment


              • #8
                hi



                i think this is what you search ,for everybodi too
                reguards

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ma330 View Post
                  tank you theseus dear
                  i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
                  electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
                  THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
                  please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
                  tank you for help
                  The schematic is correct! At least that is what was in "some" of the 301s. Others, that looked just the same on the outside had all kinds of junk and do-nothing parts stuffed in them - to make it look like it was a very complicated device.

                  Please remember what I told you!!! Nothing inside the box mounted on top of the handle, had anything to do with the response from this LRL. The box and contents were strictly there for added weight - that is all. And of course to fool the gullible and technically-challenged into thinking they got their money's worth.

                  In truth, THEY GOT RIPPED OFF BIG TIME!

                  It is a known common fact the Electroscope 301 and all the other look-alike products worked exactly the same whether or not the Power Switch was On or Off.

                  Asking for a good "working" LRL schematic is akin to asking for the Moon to be delivered to your front door.

                  There just isn't any such thing. Besides, you can get the exact same results with just bent L-shaped wires so why go to all the trouble of wiring up a do-nothing circuit?

                  The Wallet-Miner's Creed
                  Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X