Originally posted by Theseus
Apparently you are forming conclusions based on an impoverished view of the facts around you.
First, the nerve damage was diagnosed in my lower right arm. The damaged nerves have mostly healed, but they are not the same as nerves that never needed to heal. I know this because there still remains some loss of feeling in that arm. But this is not the issue with making a valid test with the Examiner. If you had read their literature, you would have seen the manufacturer states the right arm has a different millivolt signal than the left arm, and for this reason, left-handed people cannot expect good results when using the examiner. In my case, I did happen to check the millivolt signal in both hands, and I found they were nearly the same at both sides within 5% when measuring AC or DC millivolts. This, in combination with the observed response became a strong indicator to me, especially after seeing someone else find much better response. But I did try the Examiner with my left hand on quite a number of ocasions. I did not notice any substantial difference in response from the right or left hand.
As far as the Rangertell marketing claims, of course I take them seriously. These are what I am interested in testing. If I were to start out before making a test and state that I already know all of the claims are false, and that there is absolutely nothing happening in the electronics, then any testing would be predjudiced. Further there would not be a purpose to conduct a test if I had already concluded all the tests would fail. However, my puprpose is not to predjudice a test. I am interested in making observations to see if the claims are true or not. In order to do so, I must first read what the claims are then find a way to conduct a test that will give reasonable evidence that any particular claim is true or not. It simply cannot be done if the conclusion is arrived at before a test is performed.
It does not matter what opinion I may have about the performance of the Examiner, of Esteban's LRLs, of a White's PI detector, or a NASA satellite. My opinion means nothing in a test routine unless I use it to decide what the performance is before completing a test. In that cases it would mean the test was tainted by a predjudiced person influencing the results by interjecting conclusions tainted with his own bias rather than observations.
As an example, the Examiner literature does not make claims about ideamotor, so there is no basis to test that non-claim. But they did make a claim about a charge and a frequency passing from the user to the Examiner. This is something I can test on a subject who is holding the Examiner in his right hand to see if it is true or not. I can also test to see if the claim that the millivolt signal passing from the right hand is stronger than the left hand, as well as making observations of field trials. And I can perform tests to observe if any "signal lines" are established in the air between a target and the antenna, which diminish when the claimed signal source removed from the Examiner.
Apparently you don't consider it necessary to read the claims before concluding what claims are true or false. This is your prerogative. Your purpose is apparenly not to find a way to test an Examiner, but to form conclusions without even bothering to read what the claims are you conclude are wrong. It is not surprising to me that you have no constructive suggestions of how you think I should proceed.
Best wishes,
J_P




Should i hold on with my money ?
Comment