A patent to detect substances by infrared like Esteban used.

[J_Player]

Don't be jealous, I simply happened to know the answer to your question.
Esteban and I own the book. And yes, Esteban, is highly trustable.


Read, watch the video and learn.
http://www.treasurehunterssecretmanual.com/

Esteban is highly trustable? This is why you don't trust him to answer his own questions? It seems to me Esteban did not say he knows very well that a camera with special IR filters do the job. It was you who claimed that. Esteban only said he knows about it from reading a book, but never experimented with it. I can believe the things Esteban says he read, but not the BS propaganda you make about what he knows very well.

Speaking of BS, Where are the IR photos you said I should watch and learn about? I can't find any IR photos in that video.
The only thing close to IR I saw was the near IR light that was shining on the grass where the camera was pointed.
Was that the near IR LED beam the camera makes for low-light focusing?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Morgan]

TDA7000

Hi Hung.
I surprise!!!!
Because The basic name is the same (DCH85) i suppose that the main circuit is the same with the old. But before months you wrote that the technology of DCH is more low than the PDC or of the new models.
So, why mineoro sell again this old and not so good detector???

Regards

Its becouse they are using the TDA7000 or similar circuit for more sensitivity.
I instal this circuit in my DCH(prototipe) and get 10 times more distance when point the device direct to power lines or other energies,the same happens with the ICONOS (prototipe).

[Morgan]

New PD

Geo, right now I cannot speculate anything about its performance as I still have not tested. When I do, I will know what it is capable of.
As I said, Alonso decided to take his latest pistol technology inside the DCH. I was told that upon testing they found many small gold objects in the beach.

Regarding the info you posted above that you credited to me, actually I was just repassing what is found in their site. Damasio wrote that the DCH85 required about 100% of ionic fields to work long distance. The models evolved and the need for ionic fields intensity decreased. Today the latest models require only 20% or less I guess. I think you probably know what it means.
This information is featured in their site.

Hello Hung

As i can see,since Mr.Damasio die (R.I.P )you have closed relation with Alonso. Please ask him why he not sell good LRL PD in Mineoro,as he sell to closed friends,exemple this super PD he sold to spanish man(his friend).
I try this LRL,no words against,its suberb ,much more powerful and acurate than Pistoldetectors with ferrite !!!

[Morgan]

New PD

Hello Hung

As i can see,since Mr.Damasio die (R.I.P )you have closed relation with Alonso. Please ask him why he not sell good LRL PD in Mineoro,as he sell to closed friends,exemple this super PD he sold to spanish man(his friend).
I try this LRL,no words against,its suberb ,much more powerful and acurate than Pistoldetectors with ferrite !!!

[ATTACH]11300[/ATTACH]

WHY THIS WORKING LRL´S NOT PUT FOR SALE BY MINEORO ???
BOTH TECHNOLOGY COMES FROM ALONSO,THE SAME MAN WHO DEVELOP DCH MINEORO AND PISTOLDETECTORS FOR TREASURE HUNTING !!!
WHY NOT SELL ALSO THE GOOD LRL DEVICES ?

[Morgan]

DCH

WHY THIS WORKING LRL´S NOT PUT FOR SALE BY MINEORO ???
BOTH TECHNOLOGY COMES FROM ALONSO,THE SAME MAN WHO DEVELOP DCH MINEORO AND PISTOLDETECTORS FOR TREASURE HUNTING !!!
WHY NOT SELL ALSO THE GOOD LRL DEVICES ?
[ATTACH]11301[/ATTACH]

MINEORO CRAP

WHY THIS CRAP ???

[WM6]

Please ask him why he not sell good LRL PD in Mineoro,as he sell to closed friends,exemple this super PD he sold to spanish man(his friend).

Because of promotional trick, dear Morgan.

When your wishes to have the same as your friend are strong enough, you will be willing to pay for this PD at all costs. Old promotional trick nothing else.

[WM6]

MINEORO CRAP

WHY THIS CRAP ???

Sorry Morgan, this is not common mineoro crap. This Special Serie 2000 crap.

[Esteban]

Hi Esetban. You say you know about the possibility of photographing the phenomenon with a camera using special IR filter.
But you don't say you know very well that a camera with special IR filters do the job.
So it is not true what was written?
It is true you only know about a possibility?

I see the photos you posted from a book. These do not look like photos taken from a camera with an IR filter to me.
Have you ever seen an actual print from made from the negative that was taken from a camera with an IR filter?

Best wishes,
J_P

I know (and everybody knows it) that all bodies over absolute zero emits infrared. I think that metal in hot weather emits more due good conductivity of heat. I have no ever seen this in photo, only in this book.

Somebody refers me that in antenna was "discharged" big treasure buried on a stream. His friend take the photo because this person was taken photos during the use of instument and by coincidence occurs this phenomenon, but I don't know if true or not. Some day, if achieve this photo, I'll post here.

Also I hear that a person said to other (who suspect existence of treasure in a site): "Take a photo of the site and I'll tell you if are or not treasure in your yard". I heard this 10 or 12 years ago.

[Esteban]

The "eye" "see" the "phenomenon"?

[Esteban]

ooops!!!

[WM6]

. I think that metal in hot weather emits more due good conductivity of heat. I

.

This is true but not only in hot weather and not only due good conductivity.

Ideal circumstances are not under midday heat but after sunset because metals accumulate heat more than soil and emit in infra-red spectrum after sunset more than surrounding soil.

So if you put 4 coins 0.5 to 1 cm under soil surface, you can easily detect it by infrared camera after sunset. But if you put those 4 coins 20 cm deep in soil (as on disputed video) there is no way to detect something by infrared camera, no matter if you search by midday, after sunset or by midnight. At 20cm depth you need 200kg of metal to detect IR difference at surface.

It is a question of mass of metal item and related quantities of accumulated heat.

[hung]

This is true but not only in hot weather and not only due good conductivity.

Ideal circumstances are not under midday heat but after sunset because metals accumulate heat more than soil and emit in infra-red spectrum after sunset more than surrounding soil.

So if you put 4 coins 0.5 to 1 cm under soil surface, you can easily detect it by infrared camera after sunset. But if you put those 4 coins 20 cm deep in soil (as on disputed video) there is no way to detect something by infrared camera, no matter if you search by midday, after sunset or by midnight. At 20cm depth you need 200kg of metal to detect IR difference at surface.

It is a question of mass of metal item and related quantities of accumulated heat.

You don't know what you are saying... The slightest idea of what is all about.

[WM6]

You don't know what you are saying... The slightest idea of what is all about.

I am talking about ozone. What you are talking about?

[J_Player]

I know (and everybody knows it) that all bodies over absolute zero emits infrared. I think that metal in hot weather emits more due good conductivity of heat. I have no ever seen this in photo, only in this book.

Somebody refers me that in antenna was "discharged" big treasure buried on a stream. His friend take the photo because this person was taken photos during the use of instument and by coincidence occurs this phenomenon, but I don't know if true or not. Some day, if achieve this photo, I'll post here.

Also I hear that a person said to other (who suspect existence of treasure in a site): "Take a photo of the site and I'll tell you if are or not treasure in your yard". I heard this 10 or 12 years ago.

Hi Esteban,
This is an interesting answer, but it does not answer my question.
I asked if you have ever seen an actual print from made from the negative that was taken from a camera with an IR filter?

Apparently you have not. The photos you posted do not look like photos taken from a camera with a that blocks visible light and passes IR.
You would know these are not IR photos if you had seen real photos taken from a camera that was modified to pass IR and block visible light.

The particular photos you showed are images that show ordinary light colors, not the monochrome that is seen from an IR photo. Since you don't say you have seen any actual IR photos, I can see how you would not know that the photos you posted are not real IR photos that have the visible light filtered out so only IR is showing.

Best wishes,
J_P

[WM6]

The particular photos you showed are images that show ordinary light colors, not the monochrome that is seen from an IR photo. Since you are saying you have not seen any actual IR photos, I can see how you would not know that the photos you posted are not real IR photos that have the visible light filtered out so only IR is showing.

Very doubtful photos, indeed. It was some possibilities to get such photos by ordinary (not IR modified) camera too. But if camera was modified maybe other light spectrum was only half filtered (need more layer of filter foil). In this case even headlamp which lit on grass not need to be infrared, it can be only ordinary red lamp to get virtual "aura". Anyway, as you say, this is not real passive IR scan (photos).