ICONOS MD 807

[detectoman]

bfo for most range, i prefer coil big large 8 cm 1 cm diameter center adj of brass whit nucle or iron spring ( anten ) 325 turns more less
saxon for president

[takhslambos]

PD

WHAT IS ICONOS ???

Long Range Locator,work electromagnetic resonance,head with Gold sample.The same is MINEORO DCH 85.

Some people buy this devices and want to find treasure in the garden,very funny,if not find,they become unappy...This need a lot of expeditions and tests,and probably in 500 places can be found one treasure.
About distances,this LRL´s can found treasure 80 meters,and gold coin (with sparzed signals) not more than 10 meters,always need metal detector for pinpoint. The great distances they put in their sites are ILUSION.

I not give advice here for people by this expensive detectors,i say better try to build similar device with low cost price (see my threads )and try in the fields,results will be the same.

Regards

[ATTACH]12128[/ATTACH]

WHAT ABOUT THIS WHITE ONE PD?IS BETTER THAN THE BLACK ONE?

[Morgan]

PD

WHAT ABOUT THIS WHITE ONE PD?IS BETTER THAN THE BLACK ONE?

This PD in the photo (with silver coins) is the clone,it works very good.
But the original works better.

[WM6]

WHAT ABOUT THIS WHITE ONE PD?IS BETTER THAN THE BLACK ONE?

Both are in same working condition - both cannot detect nothing in soil: not from remote, nor from vicinity.

Except if targets are buried by yourself - than you detect not by PD, but by SD (Self Deception).

[Qiaozhi]

Both are in same working condition - both cannot detect nothing in soil: not from remote, nor from vicinity.

Except if targets are buried by yourself - than you detect not by PD, but by SD (Self Deception).

To be slightly pedantic - self deception applies to dowsing gadgets and certain electronic LRLs, but the PD does have a real T/R metal detector built-in (a Heathkit GD348 ) and therefore is actually capable of detecting metal buried in the ground. The debate surrounds the claimed medium-range detecting ability, not the short-range. By the way, I say "medium-range" because the PD does not claim to be a long-range detector. The term "long-range" is reserved for the idiotic claims of target detection measured in kilometers.

[hung]

See Morgan?
Now you might understand what I told you in our email group about these skeptics not suceeding in replicating the PD. After wrong schematics, inverted transistors and wacky theories of operation, they never understood what was going on.

From what he said above, you can testify they know even less now about it, than they did 2 years ago.

Alonso can sleep peacefully.
You can sleep peacefully.

[Qiaozhi]

See Morgan?
Now you might understand what I told you in our email group about these skeptics not suceeding in replicating the PD. After wrong schematics, inverted transistors and wacky theories of operation, they never understood what was going on.

From what he said above, you can testify they know even less now about it, than they did 2 years ago.

Alonso can sleep peacefully.
You can sleep peacefully.

At least the skeptics do not feel the need to post badly faked videos of their PD clones in an attempt to convince others of their (alleged) superior knowledge. You are a legend in your own lunchtime.

[WM6]

To be slightly pedantic - self deception applies to dowsing gadgets and certain electronic LRLs, but the PD does have a real T/R metal detector built-in (a Heathkit GD348 ) and therefore is actually capable of detecting metal buried in the ground.

.

Agree, but not deeper in soil as the worst Chinese metal detector. Agree that this "PD" can be used as bad MD in soil, but not as LRL PD.

If one try to use it as LRL PD it covert to EDR (Electronic Dowsing Rod) in his hand and all detecting operation to dowsing self deception.

[Qiaozhi]

Agree, but not deeper in soil as the worst Chinese metal detector. Agree that this "PD" can be used as bad MD in soil, but not as LRL PD.

If one try to use it as LRL PD it covert to EDR (Electronic Dowsing Rod) in his hand and all detecting operation to dowsing self deception.

In fact the Heathkit GD348 is an early non-motion T/R design and is badly affected by ground effect, so I agree that its ability when compared to the worst Chinese detectors is definitely not deeper.

[J_Player]

At least the skeptics do not feel the need to post badly faked videos of their PD clones in an attempt to convince others of their (alleged) superior knowledge. You are a legend in your own lunchtime.

Hmmmm.... That's it!
The missing piece of the puzzle. "legend in his own lunchtime" is the time where HungScience is supreme, and all other janitors are mesmerized by tales of this astounding knowledge until the lunch bell signals end of lunch time.