H3 Tec dowsing gimmick

[Theseus]

Okay, I'll give my two cents here. I talked to a guy who said he owned one then he started talking skeptic stuff. I also got a third hand report that another person liked theirs. Why the conflicting reports? Could it be that the one person knew how to use it? Maybe they didn't have a negative attitude? Why is it that the 5% find 95% of the treasure? I don't think most people here even understand that just because you know how to use one doesn't guarantee you will find a treasure cache. That's the way it works for metal detectors, so why the double standard for LRL's? Skeptics' loony bin.

Following that tirade, one might naturally assume that you place yourself in the 5% that find 95% of the treasure. Since you are not "skeptical" of dowsing, and believe it works just fine, and have personally found it to be FAR BETTER than Chance, could you provide some demonstrable evidence for your belief?

[Rudy]

Okay, I'll give my two cents here. ... Maybe they didn't have a negative attitude?

Hmm, I didn't realize that Nuclear Magnetic Resonance results require an operator with a particular attitude?

[Fred]

Hmm, I didn't realize that Nuclear Magnetic Resonance results require an operator with a particular attitude?

Exactly.
It works based on facts or not?

[Saturna]

Why is it that the 5% find 95% of the treasure? I don't think most people here even understand that just because you know how to use one doesn't guarantee you will find a treasure cache. That's the way it works for metal detectors, so why the double standard for LRL's? Skeptics' loony bin.

MANY well documented examples of treasure have been found with a metal detector, most notably in the UK in the last couple of years.

Show me ONE example of any ever found with an LRL. Just ONE.


A link to just one of many metal detector finds...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10729147

[Qiaozhi]

MANY well documented examples of treasure have been found with a metal detector, most notably in the UK in the last couple of years.

Show me ONE example of any ever found with an LRL. Just ONE.


A link to just one of many metal detector finds...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10729147

Now how could such a large treasure (the size of a barrel) have been missed by someone with an LRL? Especially when they can detect targets up to 10 miles away. Or in Dell's case, he should have detected it from his kitchen table in Florida using map dowsing.

[Rudy]

Now how could such a large treasure (the size of a barrel) have been missed by someone with an LRL? Especially when they can detect targets up to 10 miles away. Or in Dell's case, he should have detected it from his kitchen table in Florida using map dowsing.

Maybe he spilled some coffee on that part of the map? Caffeine greatly affects the pendulum oscillations you know.

[Jim]

I talked to a guy who said he owned one then he started talking skeptic stuff.

I would like to hear more about this. How would one go about contacting such a person. Did you meet them at the 7-11, and strike up a casual conversation about fraudulent scientific instruments, and by coincidence...it was the H3 Tec device?

Please Mike....expand on your claim

[WM6]

Okay, I'll give my two cents here. I talked to a guy who said he owned one then he started talking skeptic stuff. I also got a third hand report that another person liked theirs.

.

One more scam claim in old known fraudulent stile.

[Saturna]

Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)

I also got a third hand report that another person liked theirs.

THIRD hand report ?

I would only accept it if it was fourth or fifth hand. Certainly not third.

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

good morning Ladies & gentelmen; Hi swr , sat etc. You now have a new member to argue (discuss) ? Theories. I personally have no idea if this apparatus works or not, and frankly am not too interested, BUT, in theory it could. Shall we discuss theories?

Don Jose de La Mancha

[WM6]

g

I personally have no idea if this apparatus works or not ...., BUT, in theory it could.

Shall we discuss theories?

In which theory it could? In valid scientific theories or in private dowsing (mostly scam intended) theories?

On other way, all dowsing tricks and illusions are still many times discussed here on Remote Sensing forum, you only need to read back a lot of topics. And then, if you have something new in theories put those on forum.

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

HI you posted --> if you have something new in theories put those on forum.
************
You can be certain that I will. However, I have to leave for Guaymas on busines in few hours and it may well be Fri or Saturday before I can do so.

Don Jose de La Mancha

[WM6]

HI you posted --> if you have something new in theories put those on forum.
************
You can be certain that I will. However, I have to leave for Guaymas on busines in few hours and it may well be Fri or Saturday before I can do so.

Don Jose, if you think that this excerpt from your theories present something new in known dowsing theories i doubt that worth to post it again:

Citation:


"Try a version of psychotronics as developed in Czechoslakia.. The gentleman in question developed a series of aluminum objects that were moved , charged , and / or controlled with the mind only"


"a simple analogy is "why can I pick up an extremely weak radio wave from the other side of the world and separate it's modulator into something intelligible while I, and the apparatus are in the field of a local radio station which is so powerful that it can light up a neon tube with no physical connections?"


"I might add, the competent dowser can tune to a specific thing, since each and everything has a slightly different frequency.. No two gold nuggets, or even refined bars, have the same inherent frequency. This is why some dowsers can find nonmetallic or even living things. "


"there is also a thing called resistance, plus harmonic, and subharmonic frequencies in certain situations.."


"the body can handle an infinite no. of signals and select just the one that is pertinent.."


"A tremendous work was done by Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose on using Plants as bio instruments to measure subtle energies. He also won the Nobel peace prize on his work in Electronics and physics, in fact he is credited in being the first to send intelligible data via micro waves in th 1800's."

"I believe that they are now actively using bio-instruments to investigate telepathy, A fascinating allied Field field if one wishes to research it."

[Saturna]

.


Take heed Don Jose. Some of the members here actually know things.

You may be safer with the fantasy stuff back on Tnet.

.

[Jim]

good morning Ladies & gentelmen; Hi swr , sat etc. You now have a new member to argue (discuss) ? Theories. I personally have no idea if this apparatus works or not, and frankly am not too interested, BUT, in theory it could. Shall we discuss theories?

Don Jose de La Mancha

No. I do not want to play your pseudoscience theory games. The game itself sucks, and the crap you come-up with is so outlandish and unbelievable it simply makes me want to puke.

I've utilized the IGNORE feature on your posts on TreasureNet, and guess I will have to utilize it once again, here. To coin your phrase.....am not too interested