Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mineoro FG79-Happy new Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by aft_72005 View Post
    Hi Geo
    Happy new year with best wishes for you.
    Congratulate , nice work . can you upload eagle file ?

    Hi Aft.
    I ded not draw pcb for it.
    If you want the schematic file i can try this week to upload it.

    Regards
    Geo

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by hung View Post
      Again, this is not the FG79 model.

      Despite of using a PCB reading FG79.1, this is the old CDM210 which I bet was an experimental model as it was never advertised. Maybe only one or two units were produced and the person who bought it, probably was at Mineoro's factory at that time and did it directly from Damasio.

      Besides the ATMEL codes, I see there are mistakes in this schematic which will prevent it to work properly.
      Also I remember talking to Damasio at that time and he told me that those ATMELS were not being used anymore. So maybe this model was even older yet, probably from around 2001 or 2002.

      PS. An update from the person who recovered a small treasure weeks ago with his Mineoro.
      He has already exchanged the gold pieces for money. Don't know how much he got tough.

      Happy new year for everybody.
      Hi Hung.
      To be more serious.... the box of Mineoro writes CDM210 FreshGold FG79.1
      Now about ATMEL codes....no problem if there are errors. As you see the only job of Atmel is to gives a square wave to the "champer" and to drive the buzzer, so with 2 NE555 we don't need the Atmel. But the problem is not the Atmel but the way that Mineoro works. It uses one input for 2 signals, the signal from champer who must be only from gold (the reason of sample) and the signal from Loop. So when it will beep, you don't know if the signal it is from gold, from other metal or from electric lines.......

      Regards
      Attached Files
      Geo

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
        Hi Geo

        Best wishes to you, I think that the 2011 it will give to us a workink lrl. I have obtained good results with my last instrument, but I'm not 100 % sure... The operation principle is similar to your lrl with ferrite rod, I think a pulse system with sampling.

        Best regards
        Hi Franco.
        I am waiting for your LRL

        Regards
        Geo

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Geo
          Hi Hung.
          To be more serious.... the box of Mineoro writes CDM210 FreshGold FG79.1
          Now about ATMEL codes....no problem if there are errors. As you see the only job of Atmel is to gives a square wave to the "champer" and to drive the buzzer, so with 2 NE555 we don't need the Atmel. But the problem is not the Atmel but the way that Mineoro works. It uses one input for 2 signals, the signal from champer who must be only from gold (the reason of sample) and the signal from Loop. So when it will beep, you don't know if the signal it is from gold, from other metal or from electric lines.......

          Regards
          Hi Geo...
          No problem if there are errors in the Atmel processor...
          Who cares?
          The mineoro LRL does not need any atmel to make beeping.
          Electric lines will make beeps if no atmel in the box.

          Best wishes,
          J_P

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by J_Player View Post
            Hi Geo...
            No problem if there are errors in the Atmel processor...
            Who cares?
            The mineoro LRL does not need any atmel to make beeping.
            Electric lines will make beeps if no atmel in the box.

            Best wishes,
            J_P
            Hi J_P.
            When i own a PDC210 i made a test with the signal generator. I connected a small loop to the generator output and i checked for beeps from the Mineoro. There was at least 1000 frequencies where i heard beep.
            After this i sold it

            Regards

            btw... you never sleep??
            Geo

            Comment


            • #21
              For Qiaozhi.

              Hi Qiaozhi.
              If it is easy, i want to rename this thread from Happy new year to Mineoro FG79-Happy new Year.
              So it will be more easy for us to find something from it by using the search option.

              Regards
              Geo

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Geo View Post
                Hi Aft.
                I ded not draw pcb for it.
                If you want the schematic file i can try this week to upload it.

                Regards

                Yes, my opinion was schematic or circuit diagram( eagle file) . you uploaded , only jpeg .
                Best regards.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Geo View Post
                  Hi Hung.
                  To be more serious.... the box of Mineoro writes CDM210 FreshGold FG79.1
                  Now about ATMEL codes....no problem if there are errors. As you see the only job of Atmel is to gives a square wave to the "champer" and to drive the buzzer, so with 2 NE555 we don't need the Atmel. But the problem is not the Atmel but the way that Mineoro works. It uses one input for 2 signals, the signal from champer who must be only from gold (the reason of sample) and the signal from Loop. So when it will beep, you don't know if the signal it is from gold, from other metal or from electric lines.......

                  Regards
                  Geo, you can actually use many alternatives to it, not only the 555, but a 7555, a CD4001, etc. So what?
                  They alone, do not make a beeping circuit. You need a logical circuit to provide this once you fully understand what they are supposed to do. If you don't, you will only have a beeping trigger. That's all. This will be even harder to follow if mistakes are present in schematics.

                  To my surprise, you still appear to not understand what is going on to back up your conclusions which are mistaken.
                  An ion based detection system obviously will react to all kinds of electric fields as ions are everywhere. But the way the Mineoros are built allows it to 'classify' the gold ones.
                  This machine is about 10 years old now and despite of being good at that time, the new models are different, both in terms of circuitry and ionic chamber.
                  But, as with any electronic apparatus, it can always be improved, as long as you understand the concept and what is going on.

                  From a metaphoric view, you are trying to 'listen to the answer' to figure out the question made.
                  In some instances, you may deduce what it could be, but in others, you will not know what exactly was asked if you did not hear the question yourself. And this is what it takes.
                  "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Hi All

                    In my opinion for a LRL isn't very important to discriminate only gold, but to reveal conductive metals at many meters...

                    Best regards

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Geo View Post
                      Hi Qiaozhi.
                      If it is easy, i want to rename this thread from Happy new year to Mineoro FG79-Happy new Year.
                      So it will be more easy for us to find something from it by using the search option.

                      Regards
                      Done.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                        Done.

                        Thank you Qiaozhi
                        Geo

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by hung View Post
                          Geo, you can actually use many alternatives to it, not only the 555, but a 7555, a CD4001, etc. So what?
                          They alone, do not make a beeping circuit. You need a logical circuit to provide this once you fully understand what they are supposed to do. If you don't, you will only have a beeping trigger. That's all. This will be even harder to follow if mistakes are present in schematics.

                          To my surprise, you still appear to not understand what is going on to back up your conclusions which are mistaken.
                          An ion based detection system obviously will react to all kinds of electric fields as ions are everywhere. But the way the Mineoros are built allows it to 'classify' the gold ones.
                          This machine is about 10 years old now and despite of being good at that time, the new models are different, both in terms of circuitry and ionic chamber.
                          But, as with any electronic apparatus, it can always be improved, as long as you understand the concept and what is going on.

                          From a metaphoric view, you are trying to 'listen to the answer' to figure out the question made.
                          In some instances, you may deduce what it could be, but in others, you will not know what exactly was asked if you did not hear the question yourself. And this is what it takes.

                          Why you try to present that you did not understand what I said???. I am sure that you understood.

                          Regards
                          Geo

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                            Hi All

                            In my opinion for a LRL isn't very important to discriminate only gold, but to reveal conductive metals at many meters...

                            Best regards
                            Hi Franco.
                            Exactly.... There are other objects (no gold) that they are very very expensive....
                            For example old copper, old silver etc.....

                            Regards
                            Geo

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Geo View Post
                              Who bets????
                              Geo, "bets" was typo in my first New year wishes to you (instead of "best"). So I correct it to not get bad karma.
                              Global capital is ruining your life?
                              You have right to self-defence!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by WM6 View Post
                                Geo, "bets" was typo in my first New year wishes to you (instead of "best"). So I correct it to not get bad karma.
                                Hahaha... thanks.
                                I believe to LRL but not to Karma.
                                You are the oposite from me
                                Geo

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X