Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question for Carl Moreland

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question for Carl Moreland

    Hi Carl!
    Please answer me the following question:
    In its Report on LRL device H3Tec you wrote the following:

    "For gold, you will find that the NMR frequency is 1.754000MHz, and that this entry includes the statement "relative to 1H = 100 (MHz)". What this means is that whatever conditions produce an NMR frequency of 100MHz for hydrogen will produce an NMR frequency of 1.754MHz for gold. It turns out the NMR frequency for any given element is dependent on the applied (or ambient) magnetic field the element is exposed to. To make hydrogen precess at 100MHz requires a field strength of roughly 2.35 Teslas (T), so this becomes the reference field strength for all other elements. The NMR frequency is proportional to the magnetic field, so a field strength of 4.7T will result in an NMR frequency of 200MHz for hydrogen.
    In treasure hunting, we are looking for e.g. buried gold that is subjected to the Earth's natural magnetic field. This varies from place-to-place, but 50 microTeslas (uT) is a fair average strength. So the reference field strength of 2.35T is a whopping 47,000 times stronger than the Earth's field. Working the other way, we can find that the NMR frequency of hydrogen exposed to the Earth's field is a mere 2.13kHz. Gold, with an NMR frequency of 1.754MHz at 2.35T, will have an NMR frequency of only 37Hz or so at 50uT."


    The question is:
    Please write a mathematical procedure or formula that you got that gold has frequency of 37 hertz magnetic influence of the earth from an average of 0.5 micro Tesla.

    End:
    If gold is then frekfrenciju of 37 hertz, how much, due to the influence of the earth's magnetic field of 0.5 mT, then had the following metals:
    - Silver
    - Copper,
    - Lead and
    - Iron?

    Carl!
    Most beautiful you please answer my questions!
    Thank in advance!
    Your admirer
    Zocky-Zocky

  • #2
    Hi Zocky,
    Well, I'm not Carl but I might contribute somehow to your doubts.

    So (one more) of his 'useful' reports, in restless efforts trying to explain what he does not understand and then... explaining what he cannot explain...
    Humm... Is it a bit clear?
    I did not bother to read what he has written and never will. But I did read a little portion you posted and it's enough for me.
    Despite of what he might have written or not written, as far as I know, the H3Tec is being used right now to prospect for oil and being demonstrated to oil companies. Their users apparently have no complaints whatsoever as the H3 forum demonstrates. So...
    What Carl has written might be of only significance to his peers of skeps. Even a non user would never take his word for granted and would have his/her own conclusions.
    And guess what? That's what I exactly did! Several years ago I found his report of the Rangertell in which he strongly stated it was a scam and would never find anything.

    Well, I built it, thanks to the pics in his report.
    First thing I noticed was 'some force' making the antenna swing according to numbers I was entering in the calculator keypads. Then I found some frequencies in the internet.
    The big test came when I was on a trip to a relative's house. My wife's cousin told me he had lost his silver ring in a soccer field and asked if I could try to find it. At that time I still did not know the codes to limit detection distances what usually saves a lot of time. I only entered the frequency for silver. I found his ring and proved that Carl either was lying or had no idea on how the device worked. I'd rather prefer to believe in the second possibility.
    After that, I have also built two more of the devices he claims not working in his 'reports'. All them worked.
    Art Flowers from TNET tried 7 devices that are featured in his 'reports' as non working. He also reports all of them worked for him.
    So, understand now why I will never bother to read his latest 'report'?

    Now, answering your question, what Carl writes tough correct from a certain point of view, has nothing to do with the way the H3tec works.
    But I will just offer you some food for thought without going into the physics about it with a much simpler query that might serve you to understand a bigger picture.

    Suppose three glasses of water the same type and size. One is completely filled with the water. The second one only ¾ and the third one, is only filled half. You place one each time inside a microwave oven. Provided the magnetometer's frequency is the same in all cases, do you think the water will not boil in any of the three cases?

    Think about it.
    Have a nice day.
    "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by hung View Post
      I did not bother to read what he has written and never will. But I did read a little portion you posted and it's enough for me.
      And this is why you will never learn anything useful.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      Despite of what he might have written or not written, as far as I know, the H3Tec is being used right now to prospect for oil and being demonstrated to oil companies. Their users apparently have no complaints whatsoever as the H3 forum demonstrates. So...
      In other words, you have no idea whether it is being successfully used or not. Your comments are simply based on supposition.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      What Carl has written might be of only significance to his peers of skeps. Even a non user would never take his word for granted and would have his/her own conclusions.
      And guess what? That's what I exactly did! Several years ago I found his report of the Rangertell in which he strongly stated it was a scam and would never find anything.
      Rest assured, the RangerTell is a scam. How you can talk seriously about a cheap calculator, glued onto a plastic box of do-nothing electronics, and attached to a swivel handle, is beyond comprehension. You are easily fooled by even the simplest of hoaxes. Please do not try to fool Zocky-Zocky with the same nonsense.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      Well, I built it, thanks to the pics in his report.
      First thing I noticed was 'some force' making the antenna swing according to numbers I was entering in the calculator keypads.
      Some people just cannot break away from the self-delusion of dowsing. Yes, the ideomotor effect is quite compelling, but it is all in the mind. If you want to hunt for treasure, forget these mystical toys and buy a professional metal detector. Not one that is advertised as detecting gold from kilometers away or tens of meters deep.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      Then I found some frequencies in the internet.
      Frequencies which are completely useless in practice, as they do absolutely nothing.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      The big test came when I was on a trip to a relative's house. My wife's cousin told me he had lost his silver ring in a soccer field and asked if I could try to find it. At that time I still did not know the codes to limit detection distances what usually saves a lot of time. I only entered the frequency for silver. I found his ring and proved that Carl either was lying or had no idea on how the device worked.
      This is hearsay, and does not constitute evidence.

      Originally posted by hung View Post
      Suppose three glasses of water the same type and size. One is completely filled with the water. The second one only ¾ and the third one, is only filled half. You place one each time inside a microwave oven. Provided the magnetometer's frequency is the same in all cases, do you think the water will not boil in any of the three cases?
      Before trying to impress us with your "mind the size of a planet", try to get your facts right first. A microwave use a magnetron to heat the items inside, NOT a magnetometer. Doh!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
        A microwave use a magnetron to heat the items inside, NOT a magnetometer.
        That's right. My mistake when typing as I did not make a revision of the post.
        But for someone like you who thinks acupuncture is voodoo and have problems with polarity in electolytic capacitors, this won't make much difference really.
        "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by hung View Post
          That's right. My mistake when typing as I did not make a revision of the post.
          But for someone like you who thinks acupuncture is voodoo and have problems with polarity in electolytic capacitors, this won't make much difference really.
          You need to think before typing. The correct term is "electrolytic".
          Have you googled "magnetron" yet, to get a better understanding of what your talking about next time?

          Comment


          • #6
            If dr. Hung was knowledgeable man, as he present himself, he would solve his scientific reputacy by correction in this formulation:

            Provided the micrometer's frequency is the same in all cases, do you think the water will not boil in any of the three cases?

            Regretfully in false science micro and magneto are the same thing.
            Global capital is ruining your life?
            You have right to self-defence!

            Comment


            • #7
              That's what I like about Dr. Hung. He never lets the preponderance of facts stand in his way. And if he can't surmount them he will change the subject.

              HH Rudy,
              MXT, HeadHunter Wader


              Do or do not. There is no try.
              Yoda

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Zocky-Zocky View Post
                The question is:
                Please write a mathematical procedure or formula that you got that gold has frequency of 37 hertz magnetic influence of the earth from an average of 0.5 micro Tesla.

                End:
                If gold is then frekfrenciju of 37 hertz, how much, due to the influence of the earth's magnetic field of 0.5 mT, then had the following metals:
                - Silver
                - Copper,
                - Lead and
                - Iron?
                I'll assume you meant 50uT for Earth field... the equation is simply:



                Gold = 37.32 Hz
                Silver[107] = 86.15 Hz
                Silver[109] = 99.02 Hz
                Copper[63] = 564.15 Hz
                Copper[65] = 604.34 Hz
                Lead = 445.13 Hz
                Iron = 68.89 Hz

                Comment


                • #9
                  Oh, yeah! That's it!
                  Carl, thank you very mach!
                  Best regards!
                  Zocky-Zocky

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                    You need to think before typing. The correct term is "electrolytic".
                    Have you googled "magnetron" yet, to get a better understanding of what your talking about next time?

                    HELLO TO ALL
                    NO ONE FROM THE FRQUENCES to give news will say no ???
                    I ,agte with you wm6

                    regards vali

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by vali View Post
                      HELLO TO ALL
                      NO ONE FROM THE FRQUENCES to give news will say no ???
                      I ,agte with you wm6

                      regards vali

                      Comment


                      • #12

                        HI



                        I'm not into English, please forgive me.. I and the Turkish, Persian, Arabic and some Russian

                        regards vali

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                          I'll assume you meant 50uT for Earth field... the equation is simply:



                          Gold = 37.32 Hz
                          Silver[107] = 86.15 Hz
                          Silver[109] = 99.02 Hz
                          Copper[63] = 564.15 Hz
                          Copper[65] = 604.34 Hz
                          Lead = 445.13 Hz
                          Iron = 68.89 Hz
                          This is incorrect.
                          The Earth's magnetic field is variable and not fixed.
                          The value of 50uT is just a figure out of many inside a huge interval.

                          Hence, no need to tell that all the frequencies above fall apart.
                          What makes no difference anyway as this is not the way frequencies are estimated in the case of LRLs.
                          "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by hung View Post
                            This is incorrect.
                            The Earth's magnetic field is variable and not fixed.
                            The value of 50uT is just a figure out of many inside a huge interval.

                            Hence, no need to tell that all the frequencies above fall apart.
                            What makes no difference anyway as this is not the way frequencies are estimated in the case of LRLs.
                            This is correct.
                            Non working devices - no problem with variable Earth magnetic field.
                            This is solution incorporated in mineoro funny fake Hi-Tech creations.
                            Global capital is ruining your life?
                            You have right to self-defence!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by hung View Post
                              This is incorrect.
                              The Earth's magnetic field is variable and not fixed.
                              The value of 50uT is just a figure out of many inside a huge interval.

                              Hence, no need to tell that all the frequencies above fall apart.
                              What makes no difference anyway as this is not the way frequencies are estimated in the case of LRLs.
                              As you said earlier ... "I did not bother to read what he has written and never will. But I did read a little portion you posted and it's enough for me."

                              If you had bothered to read it, you would have known that this statement ("The Earth's magnetic field is variable and not fixed.") has already been made.
                              Please try to keep up with the discussion.
                              Or perhaps you've been too busy trying to understand the difference between a magnetometer and a magnetron.

                              Also, the second part of your post is also incorrect with regard to the claims of the H3tec device, which is the point of this particular discussion; not the fictitious inner working of the RangerTell Examiner or the Hung [greatly improved and awesome] Examiner2.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X