Oh Can't WE just Vote Qiaozhi OUT as Adimistrator

[Carl-NC]

Wow. Go backpacking a few days and look what happens!

Folks, first of all, I have the utmost respect for Qiaozhi; I have personally met him, and we see very much eye-to-eye about a lot of things. I wasn't even looking for admin help at the time but thought he'd be the ideal person. I was right.

Second, I would not allow anyone to moderate this forum except a skeptic. I have a large box full of LRL fraud that anyone is free to inspect and try out. I have no desire for an official Geotech representative to be an advocate for this crap.

Third, Qiaozhi has gone well beyond anything I would do with this forum, by fostering investigations and experiments into particular claims, especially those of so-called pistol locators. If those investigations did not produce good results, then continued skepticism is warranted.

Finally, even though Geotech is owned by someone who is highly skeptical of LRLs, I have nevertheless allowed pretty much unfettered discussions about them, even when a few of the participants overtly call me a liar, and even when others demand I shut this part of the forums down. Qiaozhi and I have also managed to keep the most cynical and disruptive skeptics under control. Go over to TNet and try to openly discuss LRLs, see where that gets ya.

I practically never personally visit this forum any more and have no desire to monitor it, so the day I remove Qiaozhi as admin is the day I shut down the RS forum.

- Carl

[Geo]

The boss talked, now the heads inside.

Hey Carl.....

[Qiaozhi]

Thanks everyone for your support. Well ... except the two (obvious) dissenters.
Although, as you can see from Carl's post, Ernie's feeble attempt to oust me from a position of power were somewhat academic. In other words, there was more chance of him flying to the dark side of the moon. Which, come to think of it, might not be a bad idea. I've heard that private space flights will soon be a reality, with KLM's Lynx spaceplane going into competition with Virgin Galactic. Advanced tickets are available from KLM for about £60,000. So presumably that means a one-way ticket could be purchased for half that price. There are over 3,000 members on Geotech, and a contribution of only £10 each could be money well spent. But now I've gone completely off topic and lost the plot.

One last think though ... Very good summary from Simon. I almost 100% agree, except for the part about a Jackass thread. We do not want to encourage "free-for-all hot-tempered discussions" of any form. The idea is to keep the discussions civil. Any out-of-hand posts are removed pretty quickly, and I would like to keep it that way. After all, we can agree to disagree, but we should all stay friends.
If anyone wants to winge and whine, they can do it over on TNET.

[satdaveuk]

This is bul****, use your time on constructive things ie project building, Its a big NO Q is doing a fine job

Regards

[Geo]

Hi Qiaozhi
After so many good reviews who you accepted in this thread, you ought to be placed a photo of yourself so we know and optical "our administrator ".....

[gibon]

Thanks everyone for your support. Well ... except the two (obvious) dissenters.
Although, as you can see from Carl's post, Ernie's feeble attempt to oust me from a position of power were somewhat academic. In other words, there was more chance of him flying to the dark side of the moon. Which, come to think of it, might not be a bad idea. I've heard that private space flights will soon be a reality, with KLM's Lynx spaceplane going into competition with Virgin Galactic. Advanced tickets are available from KLM for about £60,000. So presumably that means a one-way ticket could be purchased for half that price. There are over 3,000 members on Geotech, and a contribution of only £10 each could be money well spent. But now I've gone completely off topic and lost the plot.

One last think though ... Very good summary from Simon. I almost 100% agree, except for the part about a Jackass thread. We do not want to encourage "free-for-all hot-tempered discussions" of any form. The idea is to keep the discussions civil. Any out-of-hand posts are removed pretty quickly, and I would like to keep it that way. After all, we can agree to disagree, but we should all stay friends.
If anyone wants to winge and whine, they can do it over on TNET.

Hello Qiaozhi,

What a storie !!! . A skeptick member becoming pornograph and impolite .

This is the Kind of attitude we are suffering all the time here on Geotech forum .

How would you like to talk and defend ourselve as LRL USER ? .

Since I'm member this is always the skeptick side which is making probleme .

Everybody knows that you are skepticks Carl and you so it 's always good to see

that Wolfs are fitting themlseves.





So don't worry QIAOZHI even if we aren't in democratie here on GEOTECH forum ( Carl

closed definitely the subject ), I vote for YOU QIAOZHI.

I LOVE YOU QIAOZHI !!!!



Happy prospecting

GIBON

[Qiaozhi]

Hello Qiaozhi,

What a storie !!! . A skeptick member becoming pornograph and impolite .

This is the Kind of attitude we are suffering all the time here on Geotech forum .

How would you like to talk and defend ourselve as LRL USER ? .

Since I'm member this is always the skeptick side which is making probleme .

Everybody knows that you are skepticks Carl and you so it 's always good to see

that Wolfs are fitting themlseves.


Do don't worry QIAOZHI even if we aren't in democratie here on GEOTECH forum ( Carl

closed definitely the subject ), I vote for YOU QIAOZHI.

I LOVE YOU QIAOZHI !!!!

Happy prospecting

GIBON

There should be no need to "defend yourself", as you put it.
There are plenty of members here who have no trouble whatsoever discussing LRL technology ... and that's all we ask ... simply keep it technical, and you will not have a problem. If you want to rant and rave, do it over on TNET.

Of course, if you're an advocate of dowsing then there is little to discuss here anyway, as there is nothing technical about two bent coat hangers, unless you want to try introducing magnetically levitated low friction bearings, or some other contrivance. But even then, the concept is somewhat pointless and you're bound to get a lot of flak.

Let's consider the Bionic devices, for example. If anyone is interested in developing a DIY device using the claimed principle of the Bionic, then please go ahead. I will be one of the first to assist, even though I can probably already predict the likely result of these experiments. Experiments are good, even those involving LRLs. They help to enhance our knowledge and sort the good from the bad.

At the end of the day, remember the old adage ... "If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen."

[Qiaozhi]

I have just removed yet another post by Ernie. This time involving artificial insemination, which has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of this thread, or indeed anything to do with treasure hunting technology.

To Ernie - Despite previously giving you one last chance, I have left you teetering on the edge. One more post like the last, and you're history.

Go ahead ... make my day.

[Qiaozhi]

Obviously Ernie was determined to carry on and see how far he could push the limits of our patience on Geotech, and I have to inform you that he eventually found it. He now joins a very select group that have managed to get themselves banned despite the odds.

Goodbye Ernie.

[homefire]

Any one that is unhappy here can always start there own forum!

There are lots of Free host out there.

Be Gone With Ya!

I my self like it here!

[simonbaker]

I almost 100% agree, except for the part about a Jackass thread.

Yeah, too much trouble in the end (is that a pun?).

[Mike(Mont)]

Thanks everyone for your support. Well ... except the two (obvious) dissenters.

I guess you are referring to uncle earnie and I don't know who else. What do you want???? I gave you a "B". That's not good enough? The "F-" was what I thought about your opinions on LRL's and lotto dowsing. Sorry for being honest.

http://debunkingskeptics.com/Page1.htm

[Zocky-Zocky]

Dear friends!
A few days ago I came to the forum and did not see this discussion.
If it means something to someone, I vote to keep Qiazhi administrator, from (at least) a couple of reasons:
- Education;
- Reasonable;
- Tolerant;
- Well-intentioned;
- "Voice of reason";
-etc, etc. ....
Regards!
Zocky-Zocky

[Qiaozhi]

I guess you are referring to uncle earnie and I don't know who else. What do you want???? I gave you a "B". That's not good enough? The "F-" was what I thought about your opinions on LRL's and lotto dowsing. Sorry for being honest.

http://debunkingskeptics.com/Page1.htm

Don't panic!
The other person was Hung (who else?). See post #2.

[Qiaozhi]

I didn't want to ban Ernie, but he gave me no choice after blatantly defying my numerous warnings. It's as if he didn't believe I really had the power to eject him from Geotech, and wanted to call my bluff. But now he has to face up to reality. Actually, maybe that's a bit hopeful ... I should have said, now he has to face up to being ostracised from the Geotech forums.

Anyway, let's move on. This thread is long enough already.