DIODES QUESTION

[Esteban]

I remember seeing a radiation detector schematic where the sensor was diode(s) , but here a relatively high voltage were applied to the diodes, so the principle was similar to regular geiger tubes. This doesn´t seems to be the case here.

No, isn't the case. But also I experiment with this type of circular antenna or loop, many years ago. But whit other type of circuit.

[Theseus]

I understand! Sorry for can't explain scientifically. The results I obtain outdoor, no in the labo. So, maybe some phenomenons can't be replicate.

If isn't involved some part of electricity, why can be detectable via preamp prepared for detect this electrical/magnetic variations?

First, I would agree that dissimilar metals, when in a suitable electrolyte (perhaps certain soils) could possibly enter into an electrochemical process where there is an exchange of ions between the two metals. But these paths of current and/or conduction do not leave or float around outside of the electrolyte. Also, if a voltmeter (probes) are touched to the separate metals, a difference of potential (voltage) will be measured. The potential difference will be as a result of how far the metals are away from each other in the Galvanic Series.

However, your devices involving preamps, amplifiers and various types of antennas connected to them, could very well be picking up all sorts of extraneous noise and/or signals from an entire gamut of sources ---none of which would necessarily be buried noble metals.

I appreciate your confidence in what you are doing, and what you are observing, but your claims are in direct conflict with basic physics, electronics and in particular wave propagation. I would have to personally observe what you are doing, and with what sort of apparatus before your theory of operation could be validated.

The theory and practice of Corrosion of Metals in hostile environments is a very well known science, with tried and true instruments and protocol to arrest corrosion of all sorts of metals. It is a practice built around the science of electrochemical processes that have been studied and researched for decades now. Certainly, if there were deviations from this very old science, involving ions leaving the metals and drifting into the ether where they might be measured or detected as voltages --we would have heard about it many years ago. The fact is, this phenomenon just doesn't occur.

[Esteban]

First, I would agree that dissimilar metals, when in a suitable electrolyte (perhaps certain soils) could possibly enter into an electrochemical process where there is an exchange of ions between the two metals. But these paths of current and/or conduction do not leave or float around outside of the electrolyte. Also, if a voltmeter (probes) are touched to the separate metals, a difference of potential (voltage) will be measured. The potential difference will be as a result of how far the metals are away from each other in the Galvanic Series.

However, your devices involving preamps, amplifiers and various types of antennas connected to them, could very well be picking up all sorts of extraneous noise and/or signals from an entire gamut of sources ---none of which would necessarily be buried noble metals.

I appreciate your confidence in what you are doing, and what you are observing, but your claims are in direct conflict with basic physics, electronics and in particular wave propagation. I would have to personally observe what you are doing, and with what sort of apparatus before your theory of operation could be validated.

The theory and practice of Corrosion of Metals in hostile environments is a very well known science, with tried and true instruments and protocol to arrest corrosion of all sorts of metals. It is a practice built around the science of electrochemical processes that have been studied and researched for decades now. Certainly, if there were deviations from this very old science, involving ions leaving the metals and drifting into the ether where they might be measured or detected as voltages --we would have heard about it many years ago. The fact is, this phenomenon just doesn't occur.

Ok, but is not coincidence when the antenna or the coil or IR light pick in an only point with much precission, and in the place is the good conductive metal. And not interference. After extraction of the item, the "signal" dissapears.

Of course, if isn't in the books will be appears out the understanding and of course collide with electronics and physics. In fact, I learn from other man with wich I found many items at distance, also with BFO and other stages.

[Theseus]

Ok, but is not coincidence when the antenna or the coil or IR light pick in an only point with much precission, and in the place is the good conductive metal. And not interference. After extraction of the item, the "signal" dissapears.

Of course, if isn't in the books will be appears out the understanding and of course collide with electronics and physics. In fact, I learn from other man with wich I found many items at distance, also with BFO and other stages.

I respect your tenacity, but until I could experience for myself what exactly you are doing; I'll stick by the science of metal corrosion as I know it to be. The principles of metal corrosion are not limited to text books. There are real life examples of these processes all around us, and I have studied a great many varieties both in the lab and in the field.

Would you happen to have a video on YouTube, or anywhere that would show in detail what you are doing?

Incidentally, is your theory of operation like that expressed by the Mineoro group?

[Esteban]

I respect your tenacity, but until I could experience for myself what exactly you are doing; I'll stick by the science of metal corrosion as I know it to be. The principles of metal corrosion are not limited to text books. There are real life examples of these processes all around us, and I have studied a great many varieties both in the lab and in the field.

Would you happen to have a video on YouTube, or anywhere that would show in detail what you are doing?

Incidentally, is your theory of operation like that expressed by the Mineoro group?

I'll make this video. The only I have are "tons" of pics since ends of 70s to today. Also many pics of trips in USA in 1981 and 1985.

Part of my "theory" I learn myself, part of other man, part is of Mineoro. But I try to find myself.

[Theseus]

I'll make this video. The only I have are "tons" of pics since ends of 70s to today. Also many pics of trips in USA in 1981 and 1985.

Part of my "theory" I learn myself, part of other man, part is of Mineoro. But I try to find myself.

The reason I asked if your theory was like that of Mineoro, is because I've studied their theory of operation (for their devices) and it is sadly lacking in basic credibility.

If only ions could float around and propagate as they explain, but the fact is they don't. I would be interested in seeing your video.