![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How can comprobe if LRL rods works
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You will never convince me that dowsing rods are anything more than a trick of the mind.
To quote from the U.S. Geological Survey Report - 1917: "Further testing of dowsing ... would be a misuse of public funds." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Qiaozhi
believe me they work ,indeed they do act to something . I ccan find cavities by two L rods easily even it is cavity of hose .when passing over cavity ,rods cross. but for finding metals , it is still question mark for me???? regards |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
xaxaxa... hi all. For me is more easy to find metals than cavities ![]() Gold is a dificault metal to locate it, but al or bronze or iron are very very easy Regards
__________________
Geo |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you take the time to set up a double-blind test, you will find that the effect disappears. Here's another quote, from Time Magazine: "In other words, there is is no dowsing sense, only dowsing nonsense." |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hi Qiaozhi. I can't understand why is trick of the mind??? Yesterday afternoon i received a signal with my L Rods at my farm. I dig it (last time i spend my time at farm so it is very often and easy for me to dowse or to dig) and i found a piece of copper about 4 cm. i received the signal from 20m distance and from all the directions. So were is the trick of the mind ?? Why to do a double-blind test ??? Of course there are times that i take signal, but i find nothing. If we stay at the times where we find any object (small or big, gold or iron), i think that it is time to study the phenomenon. my regards ![]()
__________________
Geo |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No for to convince. The only method is an electronic attachment to LRL rods: in wich proportion the beeps are in coincidence with LRL "marks", just a "solution" for the intringulis...
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
But the problem is that the electronics has no useful function. It is totally reliant on the swinging rod, and is therefore a result of the ideomotor effect.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, electronic is useful because you use and antenna wich "transmitt" variations to a high-resistence coil, here not an ideomotor effect, maybe you can obtain detection with this method, because I obtain in pistol mode, and here the only difference is that the antenna girates... so this simple function (movement) made "unreliable"...
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I've conducted hundreds more DB tests on the use of the Rods than you have, that positively proves okantex, estaban, geo, know much more about earth Science than you can possibly imagine. You are wallowing in your own egotistical stupidity. Get a reality check and stop trying to scam Geotech viewers with your dis-proven nonsense. Dell
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Esteban, do you have the diagram of the PCB, i'm interesting to make this project, thank you.
Kind Regards! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Esteban stop to write here many years ago......
![]()
__________________
Geo |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh
![]() Kind Regards!! |
![]() |
|
|