LRL working principle solved !

[Funfinder]

Originally Posted by Dell Winders

HOORAY! After all these years of my telling this forum, somebody here finally figured out that electronic LRL's, or hand held L-Rods are detecting stronger emanating Magnetic fields surrounding the target, and not the target itself. My customers have known this for the past 20 years.

For the critics it's been an exercise iof expression of the dumb & dumber, which I am sure they will continue

Congratulations Fun finder, you have a few more things to learn about LRL, but I applaud your thinking. Keep up the good works! Dell

Hi Dell,

sorry but I got in contact with this forum for the first time in 2010
so the whole LRL topic was new for me and so far I haven't read
or seen your studies and information here in this forum.

This has also to do with the whole conflict, dispute and controversy
of this whole "LRL-special-task".

Personally I haven't tested your devices so far but as far as
the info from Carl Moreland who knows well enough about
reliable working electronic and circuits-construction and many
disappointed user-reviews including critical disassembling and
finding out that the inside parts "logically can not detect anything"
stuff there it seems that those detectors don't work as reliable
as usual MDs BUT thoses should work reliable.


But seems we now have the breakthrough concerning really
reliable working LRLs by Morgan, Geo and especially Andreas
from Europe.

The Goldguns telescopic antennas for shure are not for the magnetical energy
but the directional loop antennas are.

Anyway thx Dell for your congratulations and I hope this thread
will lead to more real useful information about how LRL really exactly work.




@ Dave J.
> Funfunder was being serious? I thought he was mocking LRL'ers.

No, I never mockered about the whole LRL-Topic but I hate
unscientifical work. I even had a hard time with J_Player because I
did defend the theoretical possibility of LRL detection at a time
he was extremly skeptical this could be an option at all.

And seems I was absolutly on the right track if the new developments
of Morgan, Geo and Andreas turns out to be really true working!


But it has to be on a scientifical basis by evidence and empirical observation and recreatable test results!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence

btw. I heard the new high capacity SD-cards already are also using
quantum-effect driven technology for permanently set the micro-data-storage-parts to 0 or 1.

Anyway, we all want proven facts and no pseudo-science or believes!

A device that doesn't work reliable is like a condom with a hole
or like a car that stops every few miles or kilometers! Almost worthless!