LongRangeLocators Forums  

Go Back   LongRangeLocators Forums > Main Forums > Long Range Locators

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2017, 05:53 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default

Okay, let's try a different approach. There are two components to a received signal--the reactive and the resistive. The reactive component is the reflection part and it happens at the exact same time as the transmitted signal. It appears the claims are the TRN and TV can somehow eliminate this reactive reflection by doing something to the transmitted signal. And this is what puzzles me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2017, 08:23 PM
Bill512 Bill512 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greece
Posts: 77
Default

Mike, talking about LRL with rods, you have to think diferent. It is a known problem for decades, with several names and also several approaches to solve it.
In a LRL with rod's, the problem is the "human receiver" : very unreliable.
If you manage to change the sensitivity of the user/receiver, then you will see that the signal line between generator and target, will also change.
Humans responde to the rate of change, rather to the absolute maximum value of this strange field.
Note that the dynamic range differs from user to user, as also the minimum/ maximum rate of change, that a human receiver can see.
So, in the case of an "old" massive target, we talking about an endlles chaos of local minima/maxima at wich usually a human receiver respond.
There are some (partially) solutions wich work well enough, if you deal will relative small /medium targets.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2017, 08:54 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default

Yes, I kinda think they are trying to compare an LRL response to a metal detector response. But the metal detector received signal has been processed to remove parts of the signal like with ground balancing. Of course the L-rods can't do that. So somehow the LRL transmitted signal is altered to "nullify" this?

I am trying to get spectrum lab working again. I messed up and got all excited and reset everything back to factory. Now I can't get it to work very good. Especially the frequency span. It's because the external microphone i am using is a 24 bit 96000 Hz. If anyone knows how to configure the Spectrum Lab to this microphone I would appreciate any help. This external sound card is SD-AUD20101
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2017, 10:00 PM
Mike(Mont) Mike(Mont) is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default

Made some progress with the Spectrum Lab, but something is still not working right. Will have to do more checking.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.