Thank you for your answer Mr. Franco. I think that I may have a npn with too much hfe for the antenna amplifier, I will replace it now. It's the only thing left.
I m fine thanks only so much busy. how are you oldest friend? I hope you good
I'm quite well, thanks, given the age (68 years), the only drawback is that I have little time to experiment because most of the time I live far from my laboratory.
It is possible, but I think it is not necessary, simply by changing the quartz you get different frequencies. I tried 3/4/6/8/10 Mhz and I think that 8Mhz is the best value, even if with the other values the lrl works well anyway.
Not a bad LTC 6900 chip, but Sinus is still better. The truth is that for some reason the sine on my generator is not clean, the question is a bit with a failure. How to make it clean without failure. According to pick up 33k, 47k and 330pf? A transistor with the letter B but I think that it is not the point.
Not a bad LTC 6900 chip, but Sinus is still better. The truth is that for some reason the sine on my generator is not clean, the question is a bit with a failure. How to make it clean without failure. According to pick up 33k, 47k and 330pf? A transistor with the letter B but I think that it is not the point.
Varying C1 changes the amplitude of the oscillator, however the waveform is not very important, an amplitude between 2 and 3 Volts from peak to peak is the optimal value. Too high a value would make calibration difficult. Keep in mind that the oscillator does not intervene directly in the reception of the "phenomenon", it only provides a carrier that will be somehow modulated by the phenomenon.
Comment