Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Terra Gold LR 200 (video)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
    Qiaozi, It's nice to know you can read, but your moderating skills are lacking. It's hard to determine if the subject of this thread is about the physics of operating a Long Range Locator, Mental Dowsing, About Dell, or an opinion platform for Qiaozi's to demonstrate his disdain for LRL users.



    No, I didn't. I'm sorry I was not more specific when speaking to a little dog gagging on a chewed curtain. I was referring to the Strength of "Magnetic Fields", Not the Gravitational field. Maybe later, I will try to explain why Magnetic conditions will prevent an LRL from working.

    There may be some merit to using Magnetized L-Rods. In theory, the L-rods reverse polarity while held in Human hands. If true, in practice this is why even Copper Rods are repelled by anomalous Magnetic fields.

    I have briefly tested Magnetized Stainless Steel Rods, but have not done any experimenting. Dell
    I know your technical ability is somewhat lacking, but it should be obvious that the topic of this thread concerns the Terra Gold LR 200. From the video it is immediately clear that this device is nothing more than a dowsing rod with some additional do-nothing electronics.

    As to whether this is supposed to be:
    1. About the physics of operating an LRL --- Not likely as LRLs have more to do with psychology than physics, unless you consider their interaction with gravity.
    2. Mental dowsing --- Which is a term seemingly invented by yourself, but is suitably vague so as to mean nothing.
    3. About Dell --- Well, if it helps your ego.
    4. My opinion platform --- The scientific viewpoint is not my personal view, but it is the rational view of everyone with a modicum of scientific knowledge. Also, I do not have disdain for all LRL users. You might have noticed my willingness to assist those wanting to experiment in this grey area of metal detecting. It is the dowsing nonsense that I object to, and particularly such idiotic practices as map dowsing.

    By the way, I see that you still find it exceptionally difficult to curb the insults. Apparently I am now a "little dog gagging on a chewed curtain", and have a lack of moderating skills. The list seems endless.

    Comment


    • #47
      But Qiaozhi, This thread is not about Map Dowsing?
      So, you are a hate monger, who enjoys spreading untruths and pretends it's Scientific. That's no excuse for grabbing Dave J's credit for the curtain chewing dog and making it your own. Dell
      "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
        But Qiaozhi, This thread is not about Map Dowsing?
        So, you are a hate monger, who enjoys spreading untruths and pretends it's Scientific. That's no excuse for grabbing Dave J's credit for the curtain chewing dog and making it your own. Dell
        Correct. This thread is not about map dowsing. It is about the Terra Gold LR 200, which is a dowsing rod with some additional electronics. The reference to map dowsing was made as an example of the sort of nonsense that dowsers believe, as if wandering around with a couple of bent coat hangers wasn't idiotic enough by itself.

        OK - my mistake. Dave is the "little dog gagging on a chewed curtain", whereas I am one of Carl's cronies, disrespectful, Carl's puppet, arrogant, ignorant, need to wake up, a scientific pretender, need a reality check, a rabidly biased LRL skeptic, full of self-deception, pathological, totally biased, total (sic) ignorant, constantly ranting, full of irrational suppositions, mentally challenged, have a limited mental ability, and lack moderating skills.

        Thanks for that Dell. I stand corrected.

        Comment


        • #49
          I rather like that scene in the "Wizard of Oz" movie where the dog Toto pulls the curtain aside exposing the charlatan "Wizard".

          Never met an LRL'er who liked that same scene.

          When I was a kid I discovered that most preachers didn't like it either. It didn't turn me into an atheist but it did teach me who the biggest hypocrites were.

          --Toto

          Comment


          • #50
            I predict that Dell will suddenly pretend to like that scene after all. Your turn, Dell!

            --Dave J.

            Comment


            • #51
              Dave J, There is no similarity between a trained dog directed by someone who knew what curtain was to be pulled and Dave J, who is untrained, ill directed, and inexperienced going around pulling all the wrong curtains to practice Psychological babble.


              Qiaozhi, It's hard to understand why anyone such as your self would bury their minds in the total reliability of ever changing science. Science is open minded to the possibilities. You are not. You don't appear to have the maturity, or the knowledge to be preaching Science to others. Especially, when you deny your own inherent mental ability in the name of science. Your hypocrisy is really sort of blasphemous.

              One of the terms used by Scientist for utilizing the human mind to access remote information is called "Psychic Archeology. Remote Viewing, is another. This inherent human ability is used a lot more than you admit. I hope you see fit to remove your Cranium Computer from it's Rectal Resting Place, and accept the gift of knowledge that is available to you.

              I too have been amazed at the knowledge an open mind has provide me. And I have the photo's and the witnesses to prove what I say is true. "Psychic Archeology" is a viable option used by Treasure Hunters and Scientist. Dell
              "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                One of the terms used by Scientist for utilizing the human mind to access remote information is called "Psychic Archeology. Remote Viewing, is another.
                Now you're just being silly.

                "Psychic Archaeology" has absolutely nothing to do with Science. It's just more of the usual paranormal pseudo-scientific garbage that pretends to compete with real working technology such as GPR and magnetometry.

                Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                I too have been amazed at the knowledge an open mind has provide me. And I have the photo's and the witnesses to prove what I say is true. "Psychic Archeology" is a viable option used by Treasure Hunters and Scientist. Dell
                The U.S. spent [or rather, wasted] $20 million dollars investigating remote viewing (or ESP, as it's also known) between the end of WWII and into the 1970s. The results were negative. It is definitely NOT a "viable option".

                Honestly, you need to wake up to reality and forget this medieval claptrap.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Nothing paranormal about it. Even you could learn to use your inherent mental ability. I did, and I am no exception. It's built into the human Genome. Were you able to learn to walk, run, or use your hands & arms? Do you have an Ideomotor response? Of course you do, everybody does.

                  How can you accept all these things these things and still be in denial? Dell
                  "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                    Nothing paranormal about it.
                    So why is Psychic Archaeology described as "a loose collection of practices involving the application of paranormal phenomena to problems in archaeology"?

                    Did you notice the word "paranormal" in the above description?

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                      It's just more of the usual paranormal pseudo-scientific garbage that pretends to compete with real working technology such as GPR and magnetometry.
                      I agree with Dell, omit the word "paranormal" as there is nothing paranormal about dowsing, remote viewing, or psychics. It's all ordinary stuff... some of it plain observation, some of it random luck, some of it outright fraud. None of it is what practitioners wish it was, although it's fun to pretend it is.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                        So why is Psychic Archaeology described as "a loose collection of practices involving the application of paranormal phenomena to problems in archaeology"?
                        I'd guess that definition to be from someone who likes to pretend.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                          I agree with Dell, omit the word "paranormal" as there is nothing paranormal about dowsing, remote viewing, or psychics. It's all ordinary stuff... some of it plain observation, some of it random luck, some of it outright fraud. None of it is what practitioners wish it was, although it's fun to pretend it is.
                          I understand what you're saying, but I'll let Dell figure it out.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Qiaozhi, I see Carl, is still pulling your puppet strings. Carl, knows it wise to show denial rather than admit liable. Like the disgraced Randi, Carl's misdeeds will catch up with him when he least expects it. Dell
                            "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Dell Winders View Post
                              Qiaozhi, I see Carl, is still pulling your puppet strings. Carl, knows it wise to show denial rather than admit liable. Like the disgraced Randi, Carl's misdeeds will catch up with him when he least expects it. Dell
                              I knew you wouldn't be able to figure it out.

                              Carl is agreeing with you about the misuse of the word "paranormal"; but not for the same reasons. Try reading his reply two or three times. Then it might sink in.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Carl, knows that I am correct so there is no choice but to agree to that which does not get him into trouble. You on the other hand are merely parroting Carl's lead like a good little puppet.

                                Again, your insistence on posting lame arguments that detract from the subject and your own interests has turned this forum into a farce and an effort to waste my time.

                                I know you wouldn't have it any other way, so again, you have the last word. Dell
                                "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X