Testing

[Fred]

Why do you suppose this "emission" has managed to escape detection by rational science, through all these years?

This is why i think "absorption" is more a possibility.

[Qiaozhi]

This is why i think "absorption" is more a possibility.

Why do you suppose this "emission" has managed to escape detection by rational science, through all these years?

Actually, it's probably neither absorption or emission. Just another "trick of the mind".

[Morgan]

Trick of mind ???

Actually, it's probably neither absorption or emission. Just another "trick of the mind".

Hi Qiaozhi

You look to me very inteligent and calm person,please not become so skeptic . Try to understand how this phenomenon works,why this phenomenon exist,and not have doubt about one reality comfirmed by many people.
You can be sure this PHENOMENON create by underground metals EXIST !

Regards

[Fred]

Actually, it's probably neither absorption or emission. Just another "trick of the mind".

Yes maybe,
But technically i have not found evidence that it is impossible,and theoricaly it seems to make sense.

[Esteban]

Don't remember that scientists go in the field with pistol and measure such phenomenon...

But the "emission" also can be associated with re-radiated signal of RF... is a some complex thing...

[J_Player]

I'm ultrashure that exists a kind of emission from this targets buried for long time!

Originally posted by Fred
Esteban, how can you be sure it is an emission instead or absorbtion?

Originally posted by Esteban
The machine absorpts the "emission". I build a 3 antennas instrument used in origin for to enlarge a short signal million times, so this circuit was capable for to capture "the phenomenon". This instrument reveals very sensitive and stable at the point that "the phenomenon" caused for an old rifle 7.62 cartridge, used in a revolution of 1947, for example, shows a big angle in detection, but no much distance, this is "infernal" in the nearby, but when I pass the "emission area", the detection stops. Is some difficult find the target, but is there. Lead produce short beep and only you found the lead targets when you pass over it. When I build it, the first time, detect very well an oxidated nail, and I "cure" it with 15-18 megohm resistor.

Hi Esteban,
You describe the machine of 3 antennas designed to enlarge a short signal a million times, so it is capable of capturing emissions. What kind of short signal is this machine designed to capture?
A charge in the air?
A radio signal?
A magnetic fluctuation signal?
Current leaking through an insulator?
HF noise like from sparks?
Ground current anomalies?
Voltage gradients?
X-rays?

Maybe this machine responds to all of the things I listed, or some of them. But How does this prove that there are emissions, rather than absorption? Isn't it possible that it is responding to something that is neither an emission or absorption?

Perhaps posting the schematic for this machine would help to show what kind of signal it is capable of enlarging.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Qiaozhi]

Hi Qiaozhi

You look to me very inteligent and calm person,please not become so skeptic . Try to understand how this phenomenon works,why this phenomenon exist,and not have doubt about one reality comfirmed by many people.
You can be sure this PHENOMENON create by underground metals EXIST !

Regards

The PD is the only LRL that holds any interest for me. All the other devices based on dowsing nonsense, such as the RT Examiner and Omnitron, are just junk.
However, I remain to be convinced of the PHENOMENON. At this time it still seems to be a trick of the mnd.

What double-blind testing have you done to make absolutely certain you are not actually fooling yourself into believing something that is not true?
You have to admit that human beings do have a remarkable capacity for self-deception.

[hung]

Why do you suppose this "emission" has managed to escape detection by rational science, through all these years?

What?!

Your questions just show how gullible and ignorant you and the other skepthics here are. At least 'geoskepthic' could produce better 'lineage' of skeptics with deeper scientifc knowledge. Instead what we get here? Children with high school physics...

Now answering your question:

Why do you suppose this "emission" has managed to escape detection by rational science, through all these years?

For the same reason that this same '(ir)rational science was torn in pieces by the Explorer I orbital episode in 1958 and had to be re-written to explain how antigravity affected the perigees and apogees data received and caused to throw Newton's Law all over the garbage can, simply because it's wrong.
Von Braun was the only one to understand what happened in the beginning, then when Van Allen and Pickering figured out what was happening, many years had passed and it was all covered up for more than 50 years now!

And they did not even bother to tell you!!

Go on , with your amazements, infant child of science! They only have just begun...

[Theseus]

Was this your debunkering?

Your questions just show how gullible and ignorant you and the other skepthics here are. At least 'geoskepthic' could produce better 'lineage' of skeptics with deeper scientifc knowledge. Instead what we get here? Children with high school physics...

In an effort to hide your own reliance on pseudo science, you accuse true scientists and rational science of being out of step with your "kitchen" and "garage" - built contraptions.

Your attempts are quite humorous but nevertheless very lacking in substantiation and validity. Are you some kind of LRL comedian?

Your failed "debunkering" reminds me of a couple well known axioms:

Simple truths about nature can't choose to hide from the skeptical minds and be seen by the gullible at the same time.

...and

Witchcraft always has a hard time, until it becomes established and changes its name. (would that be absorption or radiation)


I do appreciate your humor, but I think it might be wasted here.

[Qiaozhi]

What?!

Your questions just show how gullible and ignorant you and the other skepthics here are. At least 'geoskepthic' could produce better 'lineage' of skeptics with deeper scientifc knowledge. Instead what we get here? Children with high school physics...

Now answering your question:



For the same reason that this same '(ir)rational science was torn in pieces by the Explorer I orbital episode in 1958 and had to be re-written to explain how antigravity affected the perigees and apogees data received and caused to throw Newton's Law all over the garbage can, simply because it's wrong.
Von Braun was the only one to understand what happened in the beginning, then when Van Allen and Pickering figured out what was happening, many years had passed and it was all covered up for more than 50 years now!

And they did not even bother to tell you!!

Go on , with your amazements, infant child of science! They only have just begun...

But still no debunkering!

I'm glad I wasn't holding my breath...

[Fred]

Von Braun was the only one to understand what happened in the beginning, then when Van Allen and Pickering figured out what was happening, many years had passed and it was all covered up for more than 50 years now!

Hung,
I you want to contine comparing yourself with Von Braun, you will have to explain your theory too, not keep it secret

[J_Player]

But still no debunkering!

I'm glad I wasn't holding my breath...

No debunkering happened?
Wheeeeeewww
I guess no rebunkering is needed at this time.


Best wishes,
J_P


Rebunkering all that has been debunkered

[hung]

The reactions from both of you are expectable.

Sorry for hurting some feelings.
Indeed, each one of us has his/her own time for awakening. Yours have not come yet, but eventualy it will as evolution always takes its course.

Anyway, live a happy life and conquer your truths everyday. Help the poor and spread love and goodwill to all.

This is what really matters.

[Qiaozhi]

Indeed, each one of us has his/her own time for awakening. Yours have not come yet, but eventualy it will as evolution always takes its course.

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

[Theseus]

The reactions from both of you are expectable(sic).

Well, good; I would hate to surprise you.

You will be surprised enough if you ever remove your head from the sand and look around you --examining all the real science and technology that has passed you by while all this time you have wasted on pseudo and wish science.

...and still no debunkering. The only conclusion we can reach is that you have no way to debunker rational science. Maybe you should consider changing your sig block.