Yes, you're right. If we convert this forum in comic forum, we'll finish in magnus stultorum. Also, I don't like Da Vinci Code.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
X
-
If you are concerned about the use of copyright material on this site, then please read the Policies page: http://geotech.thunting.com/cgi-bin/...ile=policy.datOriginally posted by Tim Williams View PostI believe the rules should apply to copyrighted information as well as personal designed information that the author did not want published. So what does the rule say if someone publishes someone else's work?
I think there is probably some truth in this statment, but it does not apply to everyone. You can easily see the number of views (and presumably downloads) that have occured for any posted information. e.g. the PDF of the Rimatron Turbo was downloaded 368 times, which was far in excess of the number of people who posted replies.Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostIt seems that all I see here is people waiting to get there hands on everything from detector to whatever so they can build it.
In reality, when it comes to LRLs, this forum has a predominately skeptical viewpoint. The desire for schematics is not to get information for free. We would just like to see something that actually works. So far - nothing!Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostWhen it come to LRL's, they want information free when they themselves did no work at on! I see a mentality of give me here. I want it with no added input to the project. And when the owner says no, they get bashed. I'm only pointing out the overall character of the forums. You can go over to the detector , side scan and other and find where someone said something and did not want to post the schematics and in return had post against him for not providing the data.
Instead of credible scientific data that supports the idea behind a particular LRL, all we see are dubious photos of treasure supposedly found with an LRL, and at totally unbelieveable distances. In many cases it's just plain fantasy.
Well, if an LRL appears to be working for you, then use it. Why not take Carl's $25,000 test. If not for the money, then do it to prove a point.Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostIf you believe lrl's work or not is not the issue here. I know there are scams out there and that's the reason I stop selling my units. The AM radio did for me. I don't need to sell my unit to make a living. I am trying to help people that use LRL's understand the my work. Because many high dollar manufactures claim walk the line and there is the target. Not true. I have found gold and silver unknown targets with my units as so other that have them. I just want people to know that if they buy a xx,xxxx.xx unit Depending on what the manufacture instructions were, they may never find a thing.
It's very easy to say "But the truth is LRL do work.", when the reality is that they don't. This whole idea of associating particular frequencies with gold, silver, diamonds, etc., is pure fantasy. Not to mention the pseudoscientific nonsense of ionic detection.Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostI know posting this Sam will bash me on Google. He always does. But the truth is LRL do work. Sense the logger came out time after time each plot showed an anomaly in the ground. The detector pick up something. These are targets some tracked 100 of yards. Some were mineral pockets, most metal targets. Some gold and silver. No more empty holes! The one thing I would tell my customers was, my unit will bring you to whats causing the rings. Frequency is the key here. There is allot to it. But it does work.
Yes - that's good advice. If I believed in dowsing I wouldn't post here either.Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostThen maybe dowser should not post here at all. It's just not worth it to us. We don't need to prove anything.
As I said earlier, no-one is waiting here for free information. Well maybe some are, but as far as LRLs are concerned, they're going to have to wait a mighty long time.....Originally posted by Tim Williams View PostWe are not here waiting for free information, you are. I'm not taking sides but saying what anyone can see here in the post.
Comment

Comment