Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes, you're right. If we convert this forum in comic forum, we'll finish in magnus stultorum. Also, I don't like Da Vinci Code.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      I believe the rules should apply to copyrighted information as well as personal designed information that the author did not want published. So what does the rule say if someone publishes someone else's work?
      If you are concerned about the use of copyright material on this site, then please read the Policies page: http://geotech.thunting.com/cgi-bin/...ile=policy.dat

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      It seems that all I see here is people waiting to get there hands on everything from detector to whatever so they can build it.
      I think there is probably some truth in this statment, but it does not apply to everyone. You can easily see the number of views (and presumably downloads) that have occured for any posted information. e.g. the PDF of the Rimatron Turbo was downloaded 368 times, which was far in excess of the number of people who posted replies.

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      When it come to LRL's, they want information free when they themselves did no work at on! I see a mentality of give me here. I want it with no added input to the project. And when the owner says no, they get bashed. I'm only pointing out the overall character of the forums. You can go over to the detector , side scan and other and find where someone said something and did not want to post the schematics and in return had post against him for not providing the data.
      In reality, when it comes to LRLs, this forum has a predominately skeptical viewpoint. The desire for schematics is not to get information for free. We would just like to see something that actually works. So far - nothing!
      Instead of credible scientific data that supports the idea behind a particular LRL, all we see are dubious photos of treasure supposedly found with an LRL, and at totally unbelieveable distances. In many cases it's just plain fantasy.

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      If you believe lrl's work or not is not the issue here. I know there are scams out there and that's the reason I stop selling my units. The AM radio did for me. I don't need to sell my unit to make a living. I am trying to help people that use LRL's understand the my work. Because many high dollar manufactures claim walk the line and there is the target. Not true. I have found gold and silver unknown targets with my units as so other that have them. I just want people to know that if they buy a xx,xxxx.xx unit Depending on what the manufacture instructions were, they may never find a thing.
      Well, if an LRL appears to be working for you, then use it. Why not take Carl's $25,000 test. If not for the money, then do it to prove a point.

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      I know posting this Sam will bash me on Google. He always does. But the truth is LRL do work. Sense the logger came out time after time each plot showed an anomaly in the ground. The detector pick up something. These are targets some tracked 100 of yards. Some were mineral pockets, most metal targets. Some gold and silver. No more empty holes! The one thing I would tell my customers was, my unit will bring you to whats causing the rings. Frequency is the key here. There is allot to it. But it does work.
      It's very easy to say "But the truth is LRL do work.", when the reality is that they don't. This whole idea of associating particular frequencies with gold, silver, diamonds, etc., is pure fantasy. Not to mention the pseudoscientific nonsense of ionic detection.

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      Then maybe dowser should not post here at all. It's just not worth it to us. We don't need to prove anything.
      Yes - that's good advice. If I believed in dowsing I wouldn't post here either.

      Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
      We are not here waiting for free information, you are. I'm not taking sides but saying what anyone can see here in the post.
      As I said earlier, no-one is waiting here for free information. Well maybe some are, but as far as LRLs are concerned, they're going to have to wait a mighty long time.....

      Comment


      • #18
        I was not sure about you but now I know. Thank you for posting. How have you been? What no pictures.

        Tim
        Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging!

        sigpic

        Comment


        • #19
          Do you know this guy?

          Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging!

          sigpic

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tim Williams View Post
            No, I don't know Sam. But he sounds like a good guy.

            Comment


            • #21
              Bye

              Hi Esteban and Hung.
              What to say..... This forum will become poor afterwards your absence
              Personally i thank you for that opinions we change if agreed or no.
              From my heart i wish you each success

              Geo

              Comment

              Working...
              X