Mineoro 2-Box -- 492 feet range?

[Max]

That statement is false.



Which tests?
Who to date has reversed engineered it? I am only aware of somebody who dismantled one non comercial model and showed some pics. Do you think this is reverse engineering?





That statement is empty and irrelevant. Esteban has built Zahoris which worked. So what?




What facts do you have about the device in discussion? Morgan's claims?

Your statements are just 'hot air' and mean nothing from an objective perspective. Sorry.

Hi,
Nervous !?

Take it easy... if we'll discover that pistol doesn't work ...ok... we'll make us a reason of that !

Not me only built the zahori... I remember you our great member Ivconic and also Michael built one. Unfortunately we cannot find anything with it... and it doesn't work as claimed with water flows. This is a fact.

Anyone could build one and test, and see with his eyes and hear the random beeps you are so addicted!

Tests on Mineoro's were performed all over the world... I personally belive to my friends and other people that say they don't work. Also other brand stuff , but similar, resulted completely wallet-mining operations with no one single documented found.

About reverse engineering... do you mean the "ion chamber" made with PVC water pipe ?

You say they work ! So what ???

Facts = 0.

Kind regards,
Max

[Qiaozhi]

Oh, sure..

Because I think you will end up finding about the Roswell Crash too and this 'we' won't allow..

This FACT is divulged by Alonso and Damasio themselves.
Of course this only adds more weight to your total ignorance about the concept or the detector itself.
Well, this has been always expectable after all.

You...?
Where... in you private gold mine?

Well, I don't have a gun... So I assume you mean I released some false information. Tell me what those are please.

Ozzy whatever your intentions might be, you have to be certain that you will not be getting 'lunch for free'.
And maybe not even a paid lunch.

PS. Don't abuse alcohol or food these hollidays.

Nothing useful to say? Oh well - no change there then?

Facts = 0

That's the reality!

[Fred]

It can be seen in the video for instance, that it will only work for a certain target size from a very close range.
Someting the PDCs, FGs, etc. will easily surpass..

Well for the first time we have seen some evidence that a new kind of detector actually works.
On the other hand, you have send an enormous amount of misinformation, technical nonsese and absurd claims, with absolutely no proof.
Althought you seems to think we are all idiots here, we do have open minds, and when we see someone claiming interesting results and giving evidences of that, we investigate and discuss the subject.
Not more complicated thant that.
Fred.

[J_Player]

So I assume you mean I released some false information. Tell me what those are please.

Some recent false information from hung:

The way I was measuring the variances, was opening the examiner box and placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot.

We all know there is no pot connected to the diode inside the Ranger Tell. You obviously did not see the inside of the Ranger Tell box. You substituted a test outside the box to try to conceal this and the fact that you never connected a meter inside the box.

...ALL scientific comunity in the world utilizes AIAS as basis for their research.

This is a lie you told to make it look like AIAS is a respectable group known by all scientists. It is easy to prove that all the scientific community does not utilize AIAS. Simply ask anyone in the scientific community what AIAS is and see for yourself.

This is the principle in which the Rangertell Examiner works. Resonance to the elements subatomic levels when a carrier signal line is shot and returned.

There is no circuit inside the Ranger tell that shoots a carrier signal line that resonates to subatomic levels.

Best wishes,
J_P

[hung]

[quote=J_Player;64182]

We all know there is no pot connected to the diode inside the Ranger Tell. You obviously did not see the inside of the Ranger Tell box. You substituted a test outside the box to try to conceal this and the fact that you never connected a meter inside the box.

Man, you're insane. Whatever you are smoking you should quit imediately.
I own the diodes model. There's a diode direct soldered to the pot.
Any insinuations like that with sick attacks to a person's honesty just shows the rotten character that you own.

This BS from people like you has gone too far already.

[Esteban]

Hi all!!!
Calm!!! No more attacks!!!

I remember I post when Alonso, others and me found a gold watch at few meters of train rail. This was with the 2006 model and confirmed by the 2007.

Distance was superior than this Morgan's device. In this scenario was Alonso, the landlord (an aviator), Hassan and me.

The first detection was at night. The detection no was very precisse at the night because the air and the grass was very humid. Wait at the next day with good weather and we can centrate easily the watch.

[hung]

Hi all!!!
Calm!!! No more attacks!!!

I remember I post when Alonso, others and me found a gold watch at few meters of train rail. This was with the 2006 model and confirmed by the 2007.

Distance was superior than this Morgan's device. In this scenario was Alonso, the landlord (an aviator), Hassan and me.

The first detection was at night. The detection no was very precisse at the night because the air and the grass was very humid. Wait at the next day with good weather and we can centrate easily the watch.

Hey Esteban,

Thanks for confirming what all sucessful Mineoro owners have always known.

As I said, they don't need to come here to tell this. They are busy in the field.
I'm also a sucessful user, but who is unfortunate enough to deal with some people like the ones you know here. Well... I guess all forums are like that..

For those who still did not suceed for whatever reason this might be, I know this is just a matter of time (and hard research!) .

[Qiaozhi]

As I said, they don't need to come here to tell this. They are busy in the field.

So, the fact that you are here, implies that you are not busy in the field.

[Fred]

So, the fact that you are here, implies that you are not busy in the field.

[J_Player]

So I assume you mean I released some false information. Tell me what those are please. ...

Man, you're insane. Whatever you are smoking you should quit imediately.
I own the diodes model. There's a diode direct soldered to the pot.
Any insinuations like that with sick attacks to a person's honesty just shows the rotten character that you own.

Actually I was answering your request to tell you what false information you released. If you would like me to tell you what false information you released that includes only the facts without commentary about your motives, then here it is again:

Some recent false information from hung:

The way I was measuring the variances, was opening the examiner box and placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot.

We all know there is no pot connected to the diode inside the Ranger Tell. We learned about this when we looked at the photos and circuit diagram showing the diode connection that Carl posted after opening the Ranger Tell. Because Carl's photos and circuit diagram confirm the diode is not connected to a pot at either end, I would answer that your claim of "placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot" is false.

...ALL scientific comunity in the world utilizes AIAS as basis for their research.

Most of the scientific community is not familiar with AIAS, and do not have any idea how to utilize AIAS. It is easy to prove that all the scientific community does not utilize AIAS. Simply ask anyone in the scientific community what AIAS is and see for yourself. Thus I would answer that your claim that "ALL scientific comunity in the world utilizes AIAS as basis for their research" is false.

This is the principle in which the Rangertell Examiner works. Resonance to the elements subatomic levels when a carrier signal line is shot and returned.

There is no circuit inside the Ranger tell that shoots a carrier signal line that resonates to subatomic levels. There is no working circuit inside the Ranger Tell. Therefore, there is no possibility of "shooting a carrier signal line", and I would answer that this claim is also false.

Perhaps I can only speculate on your motives, but the methods of determining the recent false information you released can be checked by anyone who wants to find out if it is false or not. Please don't take these answers to your request as an attack. They are simply answers to help you identify what false information you have recently released.

Best wishes,
J_P

[ANDREAS]

Hi all.
Many-many frieds in forum, you know sums years study this LRL technology. I decided to stop, afterwards attack Roberts to me (you remember my RF pistol), other now I see, exists new interest for study of this of appliance. I believe, I know enough. If you want I can help you ONLY in private forum.
regards

[hung]

Actually I was answering your request to tell you what false information you released. If you would like me to tell you what false information you released that includes only the facts without commentary about your motives, then here it is again:

Some recent false information from hung:

We all know there is no pot connected to the diode inside the Ranger Tell. We learned about this when we looked at the photos and circuit diagram showing the diode connection that Carl posted after opening the Ranger Tell. Because Carl's photos and circuit diagram confirm the diode is not connected to a pot at either end, I would answer that your claim of "placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot" is false.

Most of the scientific community is not familiar with AIAS, and do not have any idea how to utilize AIAS. It is easy to prove that all the scientific community does not utilize AIAS. Simply ask anyone in the scientific community what AIAS is and see for yourself. Thus I would answer that your claim that "ALL scientific comunity in the world utilizes AIAS as basis for their research" is false.

There is no circuit inside the Ranger tell that shoots a carrier signal line that resonates to subatomic levels. There is no working circuit inside the Ranger Tell. Therefore, there is no possibility of "shooting a carrier signal line", and I would answer that this claim is also false.

Perhaps I can only speculate on your motives, but the methods of determining the recent false information you released can be checked by anyone who wants to find out if it is false or not. Please don't take these answers to your request as an attack. They are simply answers to help you identify what false information you have recently released.

Best wishes,
J_P

Your pathetic temptative of fixing your previous pathehtic post only made it even worse.

[hung]

Hi all.
Many-many frieds in forum, you know sums years study this LRL technology. I decided to stop, afterwards attack Roberts to me

Hi Andreas,

Yeah, I know what you mean. Nice to see you back even if it's only for a while.

Regards.

[J_Player]

Your pathetic temptative of fixing your previous pathehtic post only made it even worse.

Fixing my previous post? I only removed the parts you objected to and provided facts to answer your request. Can you show how the three items of false information you released are not false? ie:
Can you show us where the diode is connected to a pot inside a Ranger Tell?
Can you show us how "All scientific community in the world utilizes AIAS as the basis for their research"?
Can you show us how to observe a Ranger Tell "shooting a signal line"?

I really believe these are false information. Am I wrong?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Fred]

Fixing my previous post? I only removed the parts you objected to and provided facts to answer your request. Can you show how the three items of false information you released are not false? ie:
Can you show us where the diode is connected to a pot inside a Ranger Tell?
Can you show us how "All scientific community in the world utilizes AIAS as the basis for their research"?
Can you show us how to observe a Ranger Tell "shooting a signal line"?

I really believe these are false information. Am I wrong?

Best wishes,
J_P

J_P,
You should not ask that.When Hung will be back from the field,he will ask his engineers to do those tests, to resolder a diode on the right position, to take pictures, then he will answer with a long boring post that will need even more answers.
Fred.