paper money?

[Theseus]

For you who exercise a venomous tongue and are guilty of perpetrating the same malicious lies and mock the truth, Look closely at my avatar and bow down to Carl's friend,

Carl's friend... You could have fooled me. I thought that was some really older picture of you in your younger days (before the rigors of defending your lies and scam products made you old, grey and ugly).

[Theseus]

Why do it take up to 2 weeks to bend a wire and a simple circuit?

Could it be you've caught him in yet another lie?

Some things (people) just never change do they.

[Theseus]

Hmmm... Does this mean you are ready to give a credible demonstration in front of witnesses with your X-scan locating hidden dollar bills as depicted on your web page?

Best wishes,
J_P

You know J_P, that sounds like a natural for a little YouTube video. Here is a buddy of Dell's demonstrating something ??? I'm really not sure what.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kt_O2vuDrYo&feature=related

[Dell Winders]

Originally Posted by Dell Winders
It's a proportional act of nature. I am 6 feet 7 inches tall, weigh 300 lbs, and wear a size 16 shoe. It's only natural. Dell
Hmmm... Does this mean you are ready to give a credible demonstration in front of witnesses with your X-scan locating hidden dollar bills as depicted on your web page?



Best wishes,
J_P

?????? I am at a loss to understand your thinking of why posting my physical characteristics has anything to do with your interest in my giving a demonstration? I seem to be missing your intended logic.

As I have stated before, I don't give demonstrations. I do give instructions on how to hold and use the locator, or Rods, until the person is obtaining reactions to the fields of undiscriminated targets. Then I turn on the discriminator, see how they are reacting, to the signal, and then leave them on their own to trace the signal to the buried target(s) The users locate the targets on their own without my presence.

I would think with your claimed expertise you would be capable of building your own set of Rods, and add your own electronic experiments?

Carl's friend... You could have fooled me. I thought that was some really older picture of you in your younger days (before the rigors of defending your lies and scam products made you old, grey and ugly).

I guess you are easily fooled by the truth, but I am not trying fool you. The man pictured has indeed proved himself to be a Liar, and Pretender (Scammer). Now he lurks on the internet using a wide variety of aliases and fake Ip's.

It's a wonder you have any spare time to faff around on Geotech, courting the sort of abuse you receive here.

You are right, it is time consuming. You have the option to become honorable gentlemen and Discuss the subject of this forum and stop your abuse of it's participants so my time wouldn't be wasted.

Why do it take up to 2 weeks to bend a wire and a simple circuit? go to www.firstontop.com I am making a electric motorcyle.. The controller ,electrinics, welding wiring, moding etc.
I can do it all if I had two week to work on it
Let me build one of your detector to test.
I can build it in ten min.

Klondike, I certainly don't question your aptitude and skills. I don't walk in your shoes so I can only speak for myself.

There is a big difference in building a prototype for myself, than building a product for my customers from scratch. I never said I was fast, or good at it. Poor eyesight, and being handicapped and having to lie down at intervals slows me down considerably.

I would suggest you build your self a pair of Rods and learn to use them first before you add electronics. Carl, has plans on his website.

Everything mentioned on my website & more, has already been done, so therefore it can be done. You don't need me in order to build your own LRL, and your testimony that it works as claimed is of no value if I am supplying the product. It would appear I was soliciting your approval. But I thank you for the offer. I'm sure you mean well. Dell

[Clondike Clad]

I want to build your detector

?????? I am at a loss to understand your thinking of why posting my physical characteristics has anything to do with your interest in my giving a demonstration? I seem to be missing your intended logic.

As I have stated before, I don't give demonstrations. I do give instructions on how to hold and use the locator, or Rods, until the person is obtaining reactions to the fields of undiscriminated targets. Then I turn on the discriminator, see how they are reacting, to the signal, and then leave them on their own to trace the signal to the buried target(s) The users locate the targets on their own without my presence.

I would think with your claimed expertise you would be capable of building your own set of Rods, and add your own electronic experiments?



I guess you are easily fooled by the truth, but I am not trying fool you. The man pictured has indeed proved himself to be a Liar, and Pretender (Scammer). Now he lurks on the internet using a wide variety of aliases and fake Ip's.



You are right, it is time consuming. You have the option to become honorable gentlemen and Discuss the subject of this forum and stop your abuse of it's participants so my time wouldn't be wasted.



Klondike, I certainly don't question your aptitude and skills. I don't walk in your shoes so I can only speak for myself.

There is a big difference in building a prototype for myself, than building a product for my customers from scratch. I never said I was fast, or good at it. Poor eyesight, and being handicapped and having to lie down at intervals slows me down considerably.

I would suggest you build your self a pair of Rods and learn to use them first before you add electronics. Carl, has plans on his website.

Everything mentioned on my website & more, has already been done, so therefore it can be done. You don't need me in order to build your own LRL, and your testimony that it works as claimed is of no value if I am supplying the product. It would appear I was soliciting your approval. But I thank you for the offer. I'm sure you mean well. Dell

Dell I did build Carl detector and Like he said it did not work.
Your detector works or that is what your are telling us.
I don't want to sell your detectors all I want to do is test one of them.
If I can make it work I know you will build it better and I would buy one asap.

[Theseus]

I guess you are easily fooled by the truth, but I am not trying fool you. The man pictured has indeed proved himself to be a Liar, and Pretender (Scammer). Now he lurks on the internet using a wide variety of aliases and fake Ip's.Dell

Really. And did this gentleman give you permission to use his picture as an avatar. Or, is what you are doing yet another bit of fraud, like the sale of your junk lrls. I guess when you get started in a life devoted to crime and deception, it's a little hard for you to abide by any Laws of The Land. I can see your problem. You think because you wear a large shoe size, that entitles you to break the law whenever you so desire. I feel so sorry for you and your ultimate day of reckoning. I would certainly not want to be in your shoes, no matter what size they are.

[J_Player]

As I have stated before, I don't give demonstrations.

Exactly!
You will never demonstrate any of your products with the Dell Systems or Omnitron label performing in a credible test as they are depicted on your web page, because they don't work! You lied to us all.

All your name calling and other feeble attempts to pull the wool over our eyes to make us believe your products find treasure is just more Dell BS and trickery. You sleaze.

[J_Player]

...And did this gentleman give you permission to use his picture as an avatar. Or, is what you are doing yet another bit of fraud, like the sale of your junk lrls...

If you spot this man on the streets, do not throw tomatoes at him... It is NOT Dell Winders...

[Clondike Clad]

Dell I would like to talk with some customers

USED WORLDWIDE BY PROFESSIONALS:
DELL SYSTEMS- OMNITRON Molecular Frequency Discriminators have proven their value to Archaeologist, Anthropologist, Geologist, Mining Companies


Dell can I talk with some of your customers ???????
I really would like to talk with a geologist if that is ok.
Also would talk with anyone on this list.

[Dell Winders]

Dell I did build Carl detector and Like he said it did not work.
Your detector works or that is what your are telling us.
I don't want to sell your detectors all I want to do is test one of them.
If I can make it work I know you will build it better and I would buy one asap.

Klondike, I suggested you learn to use the RODS accurately before you ventured into adding the Electronics. If you can't
use the antenna RODS, and learn to correctly interpret their reactions the application of electronics for discrimination will be an exercise in futility. First things first. As I said, Carl has plans for a set of free swinging Rods on his web site.

Granted, Carl's electronic circuit configuration, and frequencies, aren't the best, but it does work. There have been at least one report of Treasure being found with it. What I don't understand is why Carl, made such a big fan fare about his circuit when he introduced it, post it on the Internet for folks to copy and build, and then tell you it doesn't work?? That doesn't make much sense to me?

Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.

No, it's unlikely you will be able to purchase any improved versions from me. I don't have the money, or resources, to build them.

Over the years I've had hundreds of offers to supply locators to people such as you, for testing, articles, feedback, percentages of Treasures found, etc. I simply don't have the finances to afford to do that. I'm sorry.

No I'm not looking for dealers. Building them on request takes up too much of my time now, but it's necessary to survive.

Dell

[Dell Winders]

Sorry folks, I just wasted an hour of the courtesy of replying to your posts only to have it disappear in the blink of an eye. Not the first time it's happend here, but I don't have time for the aggrevation. Later! Dell

[Clondike Clad]

what about letting mr talk with some of ypr customers

Klondike, I suggested you learn to use the RODS accurately before you ventured into adding the Electronics. If you can't
use the antenna RODS, and learn to correctly interpret their reactions the application of electronics for discrimination will be an exercise in futility. First things first. As I said, Carl has plans for a set of free swinging Rods on his web site.

Granted, Carl's electronic circuit configuration, and frequencies, aren't the best, but it does work. There have been at least one report of Treasure being found with it. What I don't understand is why Carl, made such a big fan fare about his circuit when he introduced it, post it on the Internet for folks to copy and build, and then tell you it doesn't work?? That doesn't make much sense to me?

Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.

No, it's unlikely you will be able to purchase any improved versions from me. I don't have the money, or resources, to build them.

Over the years I've had hundreds of offers to supply locators to people such as you, for testing, articles, feedback, percentages of Treasures found, etc. I simply don't have the finances to afford to do that. I'm sorry.

No I'm not looking for dealers. Building them on request takes up too much of my time now, but it's necessary to survive.

Dell

Ok if carl units work maybe i need to talk to Carl.

[Clondike Clad]

CARL TOLD ME NONE O THEM WORKS

Klondike, I suggested you learn to use the RODS accurately before you ventured into adding the Electronics. If you can't
use the antenna RODS, and learn to correctly interpret their reactions the application of electronics for discrimination will be an exercise in futility. First things first. As I said, Carl has plans for a set of free swinging Rods on his web site.

Granted, Carl's electronic circuit configuration, and frequencies, aren't the best, but it does work. There have been at least one report of Treasure being found with it. What I don't understand is why Carl, made such a big fan fare about his circuit when he introduced it, post it on the Internet for folks to copy and build, and then tell you it doesn't work?? That doesn't make much sense to me?

Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.

No, it's unlikely you will be able to purchase any improved versions from me. I don't have the money, or resources, to build them.

Over the years I've had hundreds of offers to supply locators to people such as you, for testing, articles, feedback, percentages of Treasures found, etc. I simply don't have the finances to afford to do that. I'm sorry.

No I'm not looking for dealers. Building them on request takes up too much of my time now, but it's necessary to survive.

Dell

wHY WON'T YOU LET ME BUILD ONE OF YOUT DETECTORS.
i HAVE THE TIME AND AFTER I BUILD IT I WILL SEND IT TO YOU FREE.
ONE MORE THING YOU LIE SO MUCH IT STANKS.
ALL I WANT TO DO IS BUILD AND TEST ONE OF YOUR DETECTORS.
IT WILL TAKE LESS TIME TO PUT UP THE INFORMATION FOR ME.
READ SOME OF YOUR POSTS LIE,LIE,LIE
WE ALL KNOW YOU LIE SO PLEASE JUST STOP IT.
DELL WE WILL HELP YOU(EVERY TIME DELL TELL A LIE WE WILL LET HIM KNOW.) I will start with this post DELL DO YOU SEE THE LIE.
Now reread your post.
Now everyone will now about you dell.

[Qiaozhi]

Klondike, I suggested you learn to use the RODS accurately before you ventured into adding the Electronics.

OK - let's read between the lines/lies - take your pick.

If you can't use the antenna RODS, and learn to correctly interpret their reactions the application of electronics for discrimination will be an exercise in futility.

In other words, the electronics don't really add any value, except to the seller. The whole idea of MFD is pure pseudoscience.

First things first. As I said, Carl has plans for a set of free swinging Rods on his web site.

Yes - and what an excellent set of plans. At least a potential buyer can determine the futility of dowsing for the minimum of cash.

Granted, Carl's electronic circuit configuration, and frequencies, aren't the best, but it does work. There have been at least one report of Treasure being found with it.

If you mean that it can detect gravity, then your statement is true. It only "works" by a trick of the mind. Even a blind squirrel can sometimes find a nut, so there's no surprises there. Randomly digging holes would have the same result. But then you're an expert at that.

What I don't understand is why Carl, made such a big fan fare about his circuit when he introduced it, post it on the Internet for folks to copy and build, and then tell you it doesn't work?? That doesn't make much sense to me?

Well that's hardly surprising from a pseudoscientific mindset. The whole purpose of posting the design was to expose the total nonsense surrounding these devices. Now do you understand?

Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.

How ever many times you multiply a number by zero, you will still get zero. Adding nonsense electronics will not improve these items one iota.

No, it's unlikely you will be able to purchase any improved versions from me. I don't have the money, or resources, to build them.

Are you so destitute that you cannot afford to buy some welding rods, a few 555 timers, stripboard, and hotglue?

Over the years I've had hundreds of offers to supply locators to people such as you, for testing, articles, feedback, percentages of Treasures found, etc. I simply don't have the finances to afford to do that. I'm sorry.

If these devices actually worked, you wouldn't be in this situation.

No I'm not looking for dealers. Building them on request takes up too much of my time now, but it's necessary to survive.

There's one born every minute, as they say. If that's true, this makes 525,600 new customers every year. That should keep you busy.

[Theseus]

Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.
Dell

Don't you ever get tired of spreading that same old tired BS?

If LRLs could be made totally electronic and computerized, they would have been many years ago.

There is just one thing that has all along kept that from happening. YOU CAN'T MIX PSEUDOSCIENCE WITH REAL SCIENCE AND EVER END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT IS REAL SCIENCE.

You, and others, have tacked on or attached your receiver rods to multi-thousands of dollars worth of electronic gadgetry, lights, readouts and frequency generators. But not ONCE have you ever come up with a device that, in the end, was anything more than pure pseudoscience. Not once!

Qiaozhi, said it best for you; but I'm sure it went sailing right over your head:
How ever many times you multiply a number by zero, you will still get zero.

You, and others, have borrowed all the terms and technology labels you can think of, and applied them to your pseudoscientific receiver rods. All done, in the hope of lending some type of credibility to your pseudoscientific junk, which has ZERO credibility.

And why do you do this....? To fool some poor technically-challenged sap into thinking the electronics are actually doing something; when in fact, the device will work exactly the same whether or not the power switch is turned on.

You, Dell, are a scam artist of the worst kind. How you can sleep at night is beyond me.