LRL Frequence of Gold

[Fred]

DNA signature, the missing secret.
We should try to discover hung´s frequency to tune elsewhere

[Theseus]

Aha! I knew you were confusing me with someone else.....

Huh?

I'm well aware of who you are Randy. Your reputation precedes you.

Yeah, right - the tuned Lecher wire goes hand in hand with the Radionics boxes from the 1920s. Have you ever considered writing for the Twilight Zone?

[hung]

WHAT!!!

You mean them Credit Suisse bars I bought are contaminated with DNA and other organic substances?
I paid good money for them, and they guaranteed 99.999 % pure gold!
Now I'm mad

Ok hung, give me the details about gold DNA and that substance it produces to coat the bars so I can sue Credit Suisse to get my money back! With your help I will get to the bottom of this "pure gold" scam in no time!

Best wishes,
J_P
__________________
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards my 99.999% pure gold bars, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

Holly crap, well you should submit them a DNA test to know if Credit Suisse is the real father.

[Esteban]

From what you are telling us.
METAL CAN TRANSMIT A SIGNAL?

These aren't my words. Electric and magnetic field associated in concordance with the size and time.

[Seden]

You don't know Jack about me Theseus

And you did EXACTLY what I thought you would do when once again as a reference I mentioned what the Europeans are using the Lecher Antenna for-in other words you fell for it.

So let's try it again, I've NEVER referred to you as Sam (you do have the same pattern as Max but you are fluent in english so that's not a match). I don't own an LRL or MFD. What I DO own is a White's GMT,a Eric Foster Goldquest V1.2 PI,a 4- terminal Resistivity meter,a dual Müeller tube geiger counter,3 mercury sniffers, a Falcon MD-20 300 KHZ detector and here let me throw you a bone to jump on-I JUST bought a Pipefinder II dowsing rod from Northern Tool Company used to locate pipes. There ya go, I just gave ya a free one-jump on it Theseus. I mean I want to see the above HIGHLIGHTED in your reply. Oh please,pretty please?!

You don't know nothing about me but I'm beginning to suspect that your an Albanian Gypsy who's got nothing to contribute but negative comments-just like the banned Max used to do right down to the "T".
So Theseus tells us what technical stuff you've been working and don't dodge the question this time-answer me!

I love Spectroscopy and have studied the different methods to analyze metals,but I keep an open mind as all the inventions have not been made yet and there's always room for experimentation. We haven't even touched the idea of using Scalar detection for metal discrimination-there's a whole new field.

Or maybe putting white noise into the ground in a putting various kind of metals in the earth then observing the spectra with a spectrum analyzer. Would be nice if we could make our own Network Analyzer and scan metals in the earth and observe the results (already been done I'm sure but it would be a learning experience that might give us ideas)

Randy

P.S.Theseus, tell me who you think I am. I think your bluffing.

Huh?

I'm well aware of who you are Randy. Your reputation precedes you.

Yeah, right - the tuned Lecher wire goes hand in hand with the Radionics boxes from the 1920s. Have you ever considered writing for the Twilight Zone?

[Steve in MS]

Can metal transmit signals? I would think yes but how useful those signals are for detection by various practical means is the big question.
Atoms have electrons and metals are good conductors and I agree with Esteban that larger metal objects are easier to detect because of their extra mass.
I have an old TR detector and it will go surprisingly deep on large objects but much less on small objects.
OK, I am still skeptical of LRLs, someone send me me a working model -free- and I will check it out....but don't bother though with the mechanical type ........those with a built-in BFO, I will give room that they might work.

[Seden]

Earth fields

Steve,

There is enough natural radiation that you might be able to detect smaller metal objects if you went to some of the higher frequencies which is something I'd like to try.

Theseus,I'd really like to know about my reputation that precedes me. Having my phone number,address,and birthdate are easily gotten off the net so I don't feel threatened or intimidated by sociopathic behavior.

I would like to hear what you feel what be a good circuit for prospecting.

What about using the abundance of background radiation from .001hz up to gamma rays?

Randy

[Carl-NC]

Theseus,

Do not post another member's personal information without their consent. The rules of the Geotech forums (and this forum in particular) include the following:

• Be polite. Write messages as if you are standing in front of someone talking to them.
• Criticism should be relevant and constructive. If you disagree with something, state your case, and move on.

Stick to the topic of discussion, there is no need to get personal. I've known Randy for a long time, and even though I might disagree with him on some points I can say that he is looking at all this from an inquisitive standpoint, and has no agenda.

- Carl

[Steve in MS]

Steve,

There is enough natural radiation that you might be able to detect smaller metal objects if you went to some of the higher frequencies which is something I'd like to try.

Theseus,I'd really like to know about my reputation that precedes me. Having my phone number,address,and birthdate are easily gotten off the net so I don't feel threatened or intimidated by sociopathic behavior.

I would like to hear what you feel what be a good circuit for prospecting.

What about using the abundance of background radiation from .001hz up to gamma rays?

Randy

Randy, I only use standard type detectors so I would have no idea what frquencies would work for prospecting, if you mean a passive type electronic device.
If you are referring to VLFs for prospecting, you probably have an idea, looking at what is for sale on the market, higher frequencies for small stuff and lower freq. or pulse for larger items.
Perhaps Esteban and others have figured out a method using BFOs with various antenna configurations, I would come closer to believing the possibility of this working over pivot point devices, that would seem to be more challenging as far as successful operation.
As far as circuits, I am not a electronic builder.
I look at this from a standpoint of how practical something works.
You mention being able to pick up signals from small gold thru means of passive devices, that would be great, if ground signals can be screened out or ignored.
I see where the mention of using a FM radio as a receiver, the higher the frequencies get, the shorter the waveform will be and I would imagine their usefulness for treasure hunting would be questionable but hey, maybe someone can mod a cell phone to pick up emissions from the ground?
I read somewhere that the military has a vehicle that can look into the ground and can tell the diff. between pulltabs and rings, probably anything else but it is necessary to wear a lead suit while operating.
The cost would be out of the reach of anyone except gov.
Large gold is not of interest to me, if I knew where some was buried I would
1 Buy the land
2 Get a very powerful PI with large coil(s)
3 Get a backhoe and sluice and start digging.
Regards.

[Seden]

Natural Background Radiation

Steve,

I don't recall using passive detectors but I am intrigued with the idea of using the natural radiation of the earth. The difficulty is not being able to use a phase detector with natural Radio Sources as it's random.

So will see what happens,

Randy

[Theseus]

Theseus,

Do not post another member's personal information without their consent. The rules of the Geotech forums (and this forum in particular) include the following:

• Be polite. Write messages as if you are standing in front of someone talking to them.
• Criticism should be relevant and constructive. If you disagree with something, state your case, and move on.

Stick to the topic of discussion, there is no need to get personal. I've known Randy for a long time, and even though I might disagree with him on some points I can say that he is looking at all this from an inquisitive standpoint, and has no agenda.

- Carl

Sorry. Randy made more than one reference to me that I had him confused with someone else. I was merely trying to enlighten him (prove to him), that in fact I did know who he was and was not confused. As Randy pointed out, I did not reveal anything about him that was not already in the public domain. Hopefully, this thread can get back to "the LRL frequence(sic) of Gold". ....and thanks for the reminders.

Incidentally, I re-read some of Randy's earlier posts to me, and I'd have to say they no doubt fell outside the scope of "polite".

[Qiaozhi]

You don't know nothing about me but I'm beginning to suspect that your an Albanian Gypsy who's got nothing to contribute but negative comments-just like the banned Max used to do right down to the "T".

What makes you think that Max was banned?

[Esteban]

What makes you think that Max was banned?

Was RObert!

[Qiaozhi]

Was RObert!

Max was Robert! ???

[Fred]

Max was Robert! ???

I think Seden mixed up Max and Robert.
If Max was Robert we would know it