Maligned Rangertell Examiner: Field Testing

[Qiaozhi]

Another reason why the Carl Morland, $25,000 publicity gimmick is an intentional deception, and useless except for his own self promotion. and gratification. Scientifically, it proves absolutely nothing except it's ability to garner the support of a few educated idiots who like to hide behind aliases and pretend they are Scientist. Dell

We should put this quote in the Hall of Fame. It's a real gem from the mighty Dell-uded Winders.

[Steve in MS]

Another reason why the Carl Morland, $25,000 publicity gimmick is an intentional deception, and useless except for his own self promotion. and gratification. Scientifically, it proves absolutely nothing except it's ability to garner the support of a few educated idiots who like to hide behind aliases and pretend they are Scientist. Dell

Dell, this thread was about the Ranger, there was no need for you to come to the defense of the Ranger, after all, that is your competition.
Wouldn't it be in your favor for the Ranger to be proven to be useless?
About Carl, I bet he would be glad to set-up a fair test, not only for your products but for the Ranger.
It would be hard for me to believe that Carl intentionally wants to destroy the LRL business.....
All we are looking for is evidence that LRLs work.......so far it is sort of like looking for sasquatch or the Loch Ness monster or UFOs.

[hipopp]

belief/disbelief/scepticism and witchcraft

folks...a large group of scientists were asked a bunch of hypothetical questions about "WHAT IF"? yup what if...what if this what if that...and they conscientiously submitted their reports to the inquirer who vetted the reports...threw out the ones that did not comply with his desired outcomes...then he put these now biased reports into a book form selling millions and up to this time the main proponent, the drug pusher if you like, is making millions out of Consultancy. The original scientists refuted their own outcomes because they are taken right out of context but they could not get their own work back from the tricksters. The consultant is Al Gore and the perpetrated fraud is Climate Change. The world is deluding itself. As a consequence of this world wide fraud believed by all and sundry I no longer Trust anyone but myself. My evaluation of the RT Examiner will be done honestly and conscientiously and my methodology will be fair and"correct" ....I can either find gold with it or it is all in the mind. If it is all in the mind then I will study this "mind" phenomena to locate further gold without the RT Ex. Fair enough??? And yes I will share all my findings on this site.

[Qiaozhi]

folks...a large group of scientists were asked a bunch of hypothetical questions about "WHAT IF"? yup what if...what if this what if that...and they conscientiously submitted their reports to the inquirer who vetted the reports...threw out the ones that did not comply with his desired outcomes...then he put these now biased reports into a book form selling millions and up to this time the main proponent, the drug pusher if you like, is making millions out of Consultancy. The original scientists refuted their own outcomes because they are taken right out of context but they could not get their own work back from the tricksters. The consultant is Al Gore and the perpetrated fraud is Climate Change. The world is deluding itself. As a consequence of this world wide fraud believed by all and sundry I no longer Trust anyone but myself. My evaluation of the RT Examiner will be done honestly and conscientiously and my methodology will be fair and"correct" ....I can either find gold with it or it is all in the mind. If it is all in the mind then I will study this "mind" phenomena to locate further gold without the RT Ex. Fair enough??? And yes I will share all my findings on this site.

Hi hipopp,

OK - I understand what you're saying with regard to only trusting your own judgment. With that idea in mind, you must then remove the only other thing that could bias the results ... you. And the only way to achieve this is by using a double-blind test procedure. You may think you can avoid self-deception by simply being aware that it exists, but you would be wrong. Human beings have a huge capacity for unconsciously deceiving themselves. We will be looking for objective and not subjective results.

We await your findings...

[hung]

Another reason why the Carl Morland, $25,000 publicity gimmick is an intentional deception, and useless except for his own self promotion. and gratification. Scientifically, it proves absolutely nothing except it's ability to garner the support of a few educated idiots who like to hide behind aliases and pretend they are Scientist. Dell

Dell, your words have never been so true. Don't be intimidated by these people.

Steve in MS said:

All we are looking for is evidence that LRLs work.......so far it is sort of like looking for sasquatch or the Loch Ness monster or UFOs

Don't be that stupid as the all the other 'skepthics' here. You don't need this forum for anything. You will never find your answers here.
Just pick your choice of LRL and buy one.
Or are you that poor?
You will discover if it works for you or not.

If you don't do that, you are just fooling yourself and acting stupid as them.

[Qiaozhi]

Just pick your choice of LRL and buy one.
Or are you that poor?
You will discover if it works for you or not.

If you don't do that, you are just fooling yourself and acting stupid as them.

You should be in marketing ... NOT!!

"Don't worry about whether it actually works or not, just buy it! If you have to ask the price, then you can't afford it."

Yes - you would need to be stupid to fall for that one.
Try getting your money back afterwards, when you find out it was all a scam.

[hung]

This to Hipopp or anyone following this thread with a non-skeptical mind only.

So if you are not hipopp or you are a 'sketphic', please ignore the following info and don't be a pest!
Thanks.
*********
Hipopp,

There's a report on LRLs type dowsing done in the past by treasurehunter David Villanueva where he teaches great techniques to be used in the field for locating targets.
David is an Electroscope user and a master of it.
I used his techniques with great sucess, back when I got my Examiner years ago.

I have this complete report in PDF. It used to be available for free in his site a few years ago, but apparently now it's for sale only. No big deal, for only 10 bucks I guess.

I strongly suggest that you or others read this report as it's rich in great information on how to use LRL type rods.

Since it's for sale now, I feel I am not allowed to publicly post the PDF file as I was going to.
But his site is highly worth a visit. There are lots of info on this subject also and the mentioning of the above report.
I would suggest you get this report as it will be a great basis for your your own study.
There's even a coment on Randi's (the balloney) test.

Good luck.

http://www.truetreasure.co.uk/

[hipopp]

thanks for the link re examiner Hung

i better not read it i might be accused of being biased...will get a friend to download a copy for reading later after i evaluate mine. These things work but how they work has me beat...will do full testing and let you know. there is far more to Physics (electronics/electromagnetism) than we know right??? so this will be a real challenge....will keep you informed Hung.

[hung]

David Villanueva

[Fred]

I have this complete report in PDF. It used to be available for free in his site a few years ago, but apparently now it's for sale only. No big deal, for only 10 bucks I guess.

The guy is actually selling his report ?!! man that´s sick

[hung]

The greatest difference among the RT Examiner and the Electroscope is that this last one has a fixed frequency and does employ a circuit battery unlike the RT. But the Electroscope is a fine device.

The RT has many, several different frequencies for each substance plus the equations and data to be input to estimate weight, distance, depth, and many other features. This is a fantastic great feature only equaled by high complex electronic gear. But even this gear can't do some readings at distance such as weight and shape estimatives as the RT does.

Its concept was the basis for my team's complex system, the MIDAS.

The real price value for the RT unit lies in the frequencies and in the equations to be input. Not in the circuit box. Once you master it, you literally have the 'field at your feet', as their site advertised once.

But built in a swivel handle brings problems we know, as there's a very thin line between the real detection of the device and the user interference by ideomotor and unconscious movement of the hand. The better the practice to leave the device do all the work with no interference, the better the results.

[Qiaozhi]

Its concept was the basis for my team's complex system, the MIDAS.

What does MIDAS stand for?

Is it "Metal Indicating Device Advanced Scanner"?
Or should that be "Scammer"?

[hung]

What does MIDAS stand for?

Is it "Metal Indicating Device Advanced Scanner"?
Or should that be "Scammer"?

Close.

Actually it's Mental Implants Donated to Aid Skeptics.

Good for those handicaped to LRLs and born with inherited skepticism.

[Qiaozhi]

Close.

Actually it's Mental Implants Donated to Aid Skeptics.

Good for those handicaped to LRLs and born with inherited skepticism.

So this new device has to be implanted in the buyer's head?
Ouch!

[Fred]

So this new device has to be implanted in the buyer's head?
Ouch!

Should i take this as an evidence that the device only works if the user follows mental conditioning?
I thought it was a tecnhinal (elctronic) instrument that could work with anyone ??