artemis

[WM6]

It is not the best but it is a lrl that work (with critical adjust) at medium distances

Mean it is not LRL but MRL.

Every MD is MRL, only pinpointers are SRL.

Working LRL exist, but only in sweet dreams.

Dreams are healing, but then in vigilance is necessary to distinguish between dreams and reality.

[Geo]

Mean it is not LRL but MRL.

Every MD is MRL, only pinpointers are SRL.

Working LRL exist, but only in sweet dreams.

Dreams are healing, but then in vigilance is necessary to distinguish between dreams and reality.

Hahaha WM6, again the same with you.
You can tell it MRL but you can't tell that every MD is MRL because noone MD can detect a coin at 3m distance.
Now about dreams... i agree with a difference, the most sweet dreams makes people that have not saw a LRL to work, people that worked with lrl have not something to dream, they saw the reality of a workable LRL

Regards

[WM6]

Hahaha WM6, again the same with you.
You can tell it MRL but you can't tell that every MD is MRL because noone MD can detect a coin at 3m distance.
Now about dreams... i agree with a difference, the most sweet dreams makes people that have not saw a LRL to work, people that worked with lrl have not something to dream, they saw the reality of a workable LRL

Hi Geo

Regarding NASA standards:

0cm - 15cm = SRL (Short Range Locator)
15cm - 15m = MRL (Medium Range Locator)
15m - 15km = LRL (Long Range Locator)
> 15km = ORL (Orbital Range Locator)

So MD are MRL.

Did you ask yourself why LRL believers durin LRL tests at the end allways aply regulary MD?

Is not so because they forgot where exactly they buried "accidentally findings" and LRL does not have anything to help?

[Geo]

Hi Geo

Regarding NASA standards:

0cm - 15cm = SRL (Short Range Locator)
15cm - 15m = MRL (Medium Range Locator)
15m - 15km = LRL (Long Range Locator)
> 15km = ORL (Orbital Range Locator)

So MD are MRL.

Did you ask yourself why LRL believers durin LRL tests at the end allways aply regulary MD?

Is not so because they forgot where exactly they buried "accidentally findings" and LRL does not have anything to help?

Thanks for the Nasa standards. Really i see them first time.
Why LRL believers durin LRL tests at the end allways aply regulary MD???
It is very simple..... to pinpoint the object.
I never said that one LRL can make work as LRL and as MD.We need the lrl to go near to the object and then we can use a PI with big coil to locate it.
A normal MD with normal coil it is only for the beach to locate coins at 25cm depth.

[WM6]

Why LRL believers durin LRL tests at the end allways aply regulary MD???
It is very simple..... to pinpoint the object.

So, can we conclude that LRL cannot detect nothing from vicinity but only from long distance?

Are there a scientific explanaton of this phenomenon or it is only about LRL modesty cause by vicinity?

[luciano furtado]

Thanks for the Nasa standards. Really i see them first time.
Why LRL believers durin LRL tests at the end allways aply regulary MD???
It is very simple..... to pinpoint the object.
I never said that one LRL can make work as LRL and as MD.We need the lrl to go near to the object and then we can use a PI with big coil to locate it.
A normal MD with normal coil it is only for the beach to locate coins at 25cm depth.

Hello friend Geo agree with you and the important work that detects hehehe ...
the rest is history ...
thanks

[Geo]

So, can we conclude that LRL cannot detect nothing from vicinity but only from long distance?

Are there a scientific explanaton of this phenomenon or it is only about LRL modesty cause by vicinity?

Hi.
About your question, i can say Yes and No. It is not a diplomatic answer but from what i have saw i can say that the more strong LRL (bigger distance) the less ability to find the exactly central of the object.
Here the results are oposite from MD. The bigger object the bigger variation from the center.

Now about the existing of a scientific explanaton of this phenomenon, ... for another time i don't Know

Regards

[Geo]

Hello friend Geo agree with you and the important work that detects hehehe ...
the rest is history ...
thanks

Hi Luciano

[Esteban]

See: edited by Stevan. no Esteban. I read Stevan in other part...

[Funfinder]

@WM6
Pls let shoot yourself to the moon by NASA if you like to confirm that 15m still would be just Medium Range Locator!

Because it depends on the size of the searched object if you can call a metal detector LRL or not.



@all
The larger the coil, the stronger the power, the better the distance!

What is needed is integrating a pinpoint coil into the large search coil without interference.

And because of the PD:

Why not register in this croatian forum and ask the person who did post the PD schematic?

Perhaps the solution is much more simplier as we think.


Anyway - now we have to find a way to make the best out of it - and btw. if you ask me this PD has alot similarity to the NASA ferrite detector - so maybe even the already known source has found it somewhere else and simply improved it!

And improving it is exactly the task what we have to do.

Using larger ferrite stuff, higher voltage, better shielding! and incorporate a good pinpointing ability.

btw. keeping intellectual value just for himself could be understood as some sort of mental greed and maybe doesn't benefit to anybody! If you like a free world you have to share at least some values that are not totally "life-important". Today entertainment anyway seems to be much more important as surviving - you see the proof for this in all TV-shows, celebrity zines and xxx-movies.

But entertainment at least could lead to some motivation or in our case "I also want to have such great life" like some stars.

Here in this MD forum our motivation is finding huge treasures by at least somehow REALLY working LRLs that has also a very huge entertainment-factor.

So let's have good and fair entertainment or interaction between of us but also really let us try to do good engineering, inventing and engineering electronical detector work! This should be the focus.


We have to find out why the PD hasn't been produced and selled since all the many years it exists / was invented and how to circumvent all the problems it may contains therefore...

[takhslambos]

artemis

do you now the price of artemis px 200 ?

[Geo]

do you now the price of artemis px 200 ?

Of course NO!

[takhslambos]

artemis

there is any more video whith artemis?