NEW PD MADE IN GREECE

[Qiaozhi]

You will have the proof.
What will be you behavior with others if you make the perfect LRL? Will you share your hard work with others?Is it posible to select who deserv or not ?
I will give here the PDK in first stage,enough to find big treasures several meters distance,i think i´m better,not so bad .

The LRL technology is noting more complicated than old BFO´s or radios,but with the correct balance for resonating will make the TH´s dream.

[ATTACH]16365[/ATTACH]

If I had a working [perfect] LRL, then I would post the details here.

None of the existing commercial electronic LRLs are big sellers. Which is why they have a very high price tag, and a disappointed user base. The LRL gizmos that are not expensive, are the ones based on dowsing, and contain some electronics that doesn't actually do anything useful.

You might as well post the full details for FREE, as most people are not going to believe that it works anyway.

LRLs (like the PDK) are designed by amateurs interested in the subject. Even if someone decides to rip off the design and make it commercial, how much profit will they really make? The design will already be in the public domain, and no-one is going to pay a high price for something they can build themselves for free.

[Morgan]

LRL experiments

At this distance your detection of the "shoes" is exceptional !!!!!! a true phenomena

I did not know if i am crazy but , i think that the reaction in the forum is very poor !!!!! nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
regards
alexis

Hi Alexis

This is normal,everybody think i lie or exagerate in my LRL experiments. And i say more,when you hear people telling they have one LRL able to find silver ring 700meters, i say is not possible,this thing as limits in the range of several meters for the small objects,otherwise it will be impossible to control in the field the PDK or other LRL.

[Morgan]

PDK project

If I had a working [perfect] LRL, then I would post the details here.

None of the existing commercial electronic LRLs are big sellers. Which is why they have a very high price tag, and a disappointed user base. The LRL gizmos that are not expensive, are the ones based on dowsing, and contain some electronics that doesn't actually do anything useful.

You might as well post the full details for FREE, as most people are not going to believe that it works anyway.

LRLs (like the PDK) are designed by amateurs interested in the subject. Even if someone decides to rip off the design and make it commercial, how much profit will they really make? The design will already be in the public domain, and no-one is going to pay a high price for something they can build themselves for free.

Well,well...

So you are very kind with people here.

[Geo]

Hi.
I believe Morgan about his PDK.
When i was to Portugal for the PD tests i had with me a simple LRL. I believe it was about the same with the Morgan's PDK and it passed successfully from the gold mental test. I don't know about Morgan's modifications but my PD was the Alonsos's passive receiver with a coil stimulator. The frequency of stimulator was 60Khz and the frequency of passive receiver was 60Khz ....255Khz. Also i had another pcb but i believe that it works the same good and without it, as it is the PDK.

Regards

[WM6]

Hello Franco

Why people go to buried copper,or aluminium? I already buried a few gold objects,and alot of silver,even a small treasure of 20 silver coins(not rare) mixed with salt. I see in all the people (even Esteban,who buried copper coins mixed with salt+vinegar) afraid to buried precious metals,but in fact it will worth becouse,we are making LRL´s and need to calibrate them to find gold&silver.

Regards

Dear Morgan, you are brave enthusiastic.

But problem with your tests is as we always pointed, that you know where buried targets are.

If you know where buried target is, than it is easy to find it even with simple wooden dowsing rod.

In case that you do not know where buried target is, your PDK will fail, except if it works as MD or one of known technical solution.

Easy to prove if you agree to undergone real test.

[WM6]

Hi Alexis

This is normal,everybody think i lie or exagerate in my LRL experiments. And i say more,when you hear people telling they have one LRL able to find silver ring 700meters, i say is not possible,this thing as limits in the range of several meters for the small objects,otherwise it will be impossible to control in the field the PDK or other LRL.

Hi Morgan

I don't think that you lie.

But if you detect something at say 3m distance in air, can we still talk about LRL?

It is relative easy to build device that can detect metal at couple meters distance in air. We can detect air targets even with our eyes.

But all those devices fail even shallow detection in soil. All such devices, inclusive "Alonso PD" and its derivative.

[WM6]

Hi.
I believe Morgan about his PDK.
When i was to Portugal for the PD tests i had with me a simple LRL. I believe it was about the same with the Morgan's PDK and it passed successfully from the gold mental test. I don't know about Morgan's modifications but my PD was the Alonsos's passive receiver with a coil stimulator. The frequency of stimulator was 60Khz and the frequency of passive receiver was 60Khz ....255Khz. Also i had another pcb but i believe that it works the same good and without it, as it is the PDK.

Regards

Dear Geo, sorry for a little play with your words, this is for my friend Funfider which do not know what religiuos question is.

I know Geo, that you believe, because you are LRL beliver.

But outside of our beliefs Alonso passive receiver cannot work as LRL even with seven (7) coil stimulators.

Easy to prove in real test.

[Geo]

Dear Geo, sorry for a little play with your words, this is for my friend Funfider which do not know what religiuos question is.

I know Geo, that you believe, because you are LRL beliver.

But outside of our beliefs Alonso passive receiver cannot work as LRL even with seven (7) coil stimulators.

Easy to prove in real test.

Hi WM6.
Yes, with 7 stimulators it is difficult to work but with one (1) Yes.

Regards

[Geo]

Hi Morgan

I don't think that you lie.

But if you detect something at say 3m distance in air, can we still talk about LRL?

It is relative easy to build device that can detect metal at couple meters distance in air. We can detect air targets even with our eyes.

But all those devices fail even shallow detection in soil. All such devices, inclusive "Alonso PD" and its derivative.

If we detect a coin from 3 or 5 m far and 30cm deep in the earth then who is your opinion???? Are we speak for LRL or not????

Regards

[Barbarossa]

this not a lrl.this is mrl. midl range locator

[WM6]

If we detect a coin from 3 or 5 m far and 30cm deep in the earth then who is your opinion???? Are we speak for LRL or not????

Regards

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

[mikebg]

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

The results should be published here:

http://www.jir.com/

[Morgan]

LRL experiments

For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.

So i have only Midle Range Locators...


The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.

[WM6]

So i have only Midle Range Locators...


The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.

If working, middle range is far enough.

Waiting on film, hope there is experienced screenwriter behind.

[Alexismex]

For everyone..... in all the forum of metal detectors enthusiast
DETECTION of this small item in Silver o Gold (shoe) at one meter (i did not say two o four meters) and 30 cm deep is exceptional,
I will buy it in the instant........