Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lrl from Italy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Regarding the transistor 548 why it is not suitable for this device؟, the frequency of 200 MHz

    Comment


    • Thank you for your cooperation Dear Franco, I forgot to thank you,
      I was busy with the many devices that I made

      Comment


      • Originally posted by shahrayar View Post
        Regarding the transistor 548 why it is not suitable for this device؟, the frequency of 200 MHz
        I think any transistor BC...C is suitable.

        Comment


        • Thanks dear Franco, you are a very nice person
          What do you think of this amendment?

          Comment


          • Maybe this is better than crystal

            Comment


            • Originally posted by shahrayar View Post
              Thanks dear Franco, you are a very nice person
              What do you think of this amendment?
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=680zTzg80Uk
              think that's ok.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by shahrayar View Post
                Maybe this is better than crystal
                I chose the quartz version because it is much simpler and just as effective, in fact there are fewer components, you can easily change the frequency only by changing the quartz and oscillating more easily.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                  think that's ok.

                  Comment


                  • Sir Franco, I have set up a transmitter antenna, and another for reception . Frequency 10 MHZ
                    What do you think this way?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by shahrayar View Post
                      Sir Franco, I have set up a transmitter antenna, and another for reception . Frequency 10 MHZ
                      What do you think this way?
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmq4-ODVXuA
                      My lrl operates in the range of 100Mhz, the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 2 -10Mhz (approximately) and does not intervene directly in the reception of the "phenomenon". However the only way to verify the goodness of your change is on the test field, with buried metals.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                        My lrl operates in the range of 100Mhz, the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 2 -10Mhz (approximately) and does not intervene directly in the reception of the "phenomenon". However the only way to verify the goodness of your change is on the test field, with buried metals.
                        I have used 10 MHz transmitter and 10 MHz receiver by adjusting the coil variable
                        the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 10Mhz
                        I understood from your saying I could use reception up to 100 MHz

                        Comment


                        • Dear Franco
                          What do you think of this oscillator?

                          [IMG][/IMG]

                          [IMG][/IMG]

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by shahrayar View Post
                            Dear Franco
                            What do you think of this oscillator?

                            [IMG][/IMG]

                            [IMG][/IMG]
                            I don't know what to say, at first sight it seems to me too complicated and not always what works in theory in a simulation in reality works just as well.

                            Comment


                            • Yes it does not work in simulation

                              Comment


                              • Finally, I found an effective circuit simulator

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X