Regarding the transistor 548 why it is not suitable for this device؟, the frequency of 200 MHz
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lrl from Italy
Collapse
X
-
Thanks dear Franco, you are a very nice person
What do you think of this amendment?
Comment
-
think that's ok.Originally posted by shahrayar View PostThanks dear Franco, you are a very nice person
What do you think of this amendment?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=680zTzg80Uk
Comment
-
Sir Franco, I have set up a transmitter antenna, and another for reception . Frequency 10 MHZ
What do you think this way?
Comment
-
My lrl operates in the range of 100Mhz, the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 2 -10Mhz (approximately) and does not intervene directly in the reception of the "phenomenon". However the only way to verify the goodness of your change is on the test field, with buried metals.Originally posted by shahrayar View PostSir Franco, I have set up a transmitter antenna, and another for reception . Frequency 10 MHZ
What do you think this way?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmq4-ODVXuA
Comment
-
I have used 10 MHz transmitter and 10 MHz receiver by adjusting the coil variableOriginally posted by FrancoItaly View PostMy lrl operates in the range of 100Mhz, the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 2 -10Mhz (approximately) and does not intervene directly in the reception of the "phenomenon". However the only way to verify the goodness of your change is on the test field, with buried metals.
the frequency of the internal oscillator is in the range 10Mhz
I understood from your saying I could use reception up to 100 MHz
Comment




Comment