Zahori

[Fred]

hi dear wm6
Can be identified with the orbit of gold in soil????

Can you count fast enough ?

[Fred]

The cost of green UV-A LEDs has risen dramatically since the WM6 circuit and improvements was leaked from the forum.
I don't know where you can get one for less than 19999,99 £.
But the cost will probably go down after all the world treasure is found from using the WM6 LRL.
For night white UV-B LEDs you are better to not use these...
They will load down the circuit and make your batteries go flat very fast.
Better to wait for a full moon when you want to go for night treasure hunting.

Best wishes,
J_P

Thank you for your answer.I like the price.

[mesy64]

Can you count fast enough ?

yes i have enough

[Fred]

yes i have enough

Not money, spinning electrons !
It was a just a joke.

[Leto]

The cost of green UV-A LEDs has risen dramatically since the WM6 circuit and improvements was leaked from the forum.
I don't know where you can get one for less than 19999,99 £.
But the cost will probably go down after all the world treasure is found from using the WM6 LRL.
For night white UV-B LEDs you are better to not use these...
They will load down the circuit and make your batteries go flat very fast.
Better to wait for a full moon when you want to go for night treasure hunting.

Best wishes,
J_P

Found discounted UV-B LEDs for 19998.99 BRL

http://www.hungcorp.com/UV-A%20LEDs_discount.br/

The site server is slow so keep trying..

[J_Player]

Found discounted UV-B LEDs for 19998.99 BRL
http://www.hungcorp.com/UV-A%20LEDs_discount.br/
The site server is slow so keep trying..

Thank you Leto,
But even the hungcorp UV LEDs are too expensive for me.
Engineers in the secret bunker have been experimenting with single-sideband non-modulated light beams, and they discovered an ordinary red LED can discriminate the difference between dental gold and jewelry gold if gold from a tooth filling is placed in the sample chamber to be ionized by charging it with 5 volt pulses.

How the non-modulated light discriminates is a single-sideband secret.
But it does not matter because red LEDs cost less than 0.01 eu.
One important tip is you must use a lens to make the red LED to focus into a beam.
Or you could use a red laser pointer which is already a good beam.
But the red laser pointer cost more than 0.01 eu, so better to use the red LED.

You can see it is no longer necessary to spend 19999,99 £ or 19999,99 BRL for the green UV-A LED.


Good luck with your treasure hunting,
J_P

[WM6]

Hi J_P

be carefull with all such data, patent troll is watching everywhere.

[Geo]

You have sufficiently large ability to parodies and to destroy any matter which you do not like

[WM6]

You have sufficiently large ability to parodies and to destroy any matter which you do not like

Me? What will you say about the global financial capitalism that will destroy our lives?

These are just harmless jokes Geo.

And version of Zahori I posted above is clearly serious circuit.

How with your PD project are there some progress?

[Geo]

Regards..........

[Rudy]

Thank you Leto,
But even the hungcorp UV LEDs are too expensive for me.
Engineers in the secret bunker have been experimenting with single-sideband non-modulated light beams, and they discovered an ordinary red LED can discriminate the difference between dental gold and jewelry gold if gold from a tooth filling is placed in the sample chamber to be ionized by charging it with 5 volt pulses.

How the non-modulated light discriminates is a single-sideband secret.
But it does not matter because red LEDs cost less than 0.01 eu.
One important tip is you must use a lens to make the red LED to focus into a beam.
Or you could use a red laser pointer which is already a good beam.
But the red laser pointer cost more than 0.01 eu, so better to use the red LED.

You can see it is no longer necessary to spend 19999,99 £ or 19999,99 BRL for the green UV-A LED.


Good luck with your treasure hunting,
J_P

Very interesting JP. Does it matter wether the upper or the lower sideband is used? I think the lower sideband would be better as most targets are low on the ground. What do you think?

[J_Player]

Very interesting JP. Does it matter wether the upper or the lower sideband is used? I think the lower sideband would be better as most targets are low on the ground. What do you think?

Well, I was thinking the same thing... It is obviously the lower sideband...
Until I read some science books that say you need to have some modulation in order for a carrier wave to work for sending signals.
But then we are talking about non modulated light beams carriers... not strictly considered RF, so the rules change due to relativity effects on the subatomic level.

Conclusion:
Upper or lower sideband cannot be determined without secret light carrier SSB explanation.
The best we can do is to make a wild guess.

Best wishes,
J_P

p.s. After reading science websites, I concluded the sideband must be either a UV sideband or a NIR sideband. Do you think I got it right?
If so, I hope the UV or NIR LEDs come in red or green so they are easy to see where we are pointing the beam.

[J_Player]

You have sufficiently large ability to parodies and to destroy any matter which you do not like

Hi Geo,
I think you have it wrong.
This is the thread Estaban started when he wanted to talk about the Zahori circuit.
Esteban's thread was destroyed long ago when LRL experimenters decided they don't like his Zahori circuit and want to change the thread to the charge detector thread.

We see that The Zahori is a charge detector which has a special digital filter which discharges the antenna at 50 or 60 Hz to help stability.
The Zahori is not a simple static charge detector. The Zahori is different because it has the added digital 50-60 Hz filter.


Esteban and Carlos originally talked about this circuit in 2002 http://geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6664
Then Esteban posted the Zahori schematic in 2005 here http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10601
Then Esteban posted the Zahori a third time in Ivconic's negative ion detector thread here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...864#post=40864

But Esteban knew the Zahori is not a simple air charge detector because it has the 50/60 Hz discharging filter added to the circuit.
He wanted a special thread for only this Zahori circuit so he could explain how the 50/60 filter works and details of this circuit.
He did not want to confuse this Zahori circuit with the static charge circuits he saw in Ivconic's ion detector thread which did not have the 50/60 Hz filter.
So he started this new Zahori thread here for only the Zahori and not the other static charge detectors that I posted in Ivconic's thread.

This Zahori thread became a very good thread where people can learn about the Zahori circuit.
But then some LRL experimenters decided they don't like Esteban's Zahori and they want to change his Zahori back to the circuit which I made for the Ivconic static charge detecting.
You can find where I first posted this circuit here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...405#post=41405



Morgan calls my circuit the "Mini Zahori" when he connects his antenna to it.
But I can tell you it is not called Mini Zahori or any kind of Zahori.
I know because I am the designer of this circuit..!

My charge detector circuit is based on a simple static detector and negative ion detector by Andy Collinson here: http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Circui.../staticdet.htm
I never added a digital filter for 50/60 Hz to make it into a Zahori detector.
I only added a versatile audio amplifier to replace Andy's meter, and connected it to Ivconic's antenna.
I would never call this a Zahori because it has no digital discharging filter that we find in the Zahori.

But now Experimenters make a joke with my circuit and name it "Mini Zahori".
I begin to wonder why they are making this joke.
I wonder why they don't make their posts about this circuit in the ion detector thread where they found it instead of in Esteban's thread for the Zahori.
I wonder why they don't call my circuit by its correct name as the "charge detector" instead of pretending it is a zahori circuit.

If we read the thread from the beginning, then we see the reason.
It is because they don't like Esteban's Zahori discussion.
They want to change to discussion of my circuit and stop the talk of true Zahori circuit.
You can see for yourself here http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...749#post=88749
Where my charge detector circuit is called Mini Zahory if an "ionic chamber" is added.
But adding chambers or samples does not change my circuit into any form of the Zahori circuit.
Not unless a 50/60 Hz filter is added to the sensing circuit.

Esteban quickly tries to get back to the Zahori circuit which he wanted to talk about when he shows more details to the true Zahori here and below: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...930#post=88930
But my electric charge detector circuit comes back again here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...61#post=122861
And it continues to be called a "mini zahori" when it is connected to an antenna with a sample in it.
But we see there is no 50/60 Hz filter circuit in this detector - no Zahori circuit at all.

For me, I do not care if people want to call my circuit Zahori or not.
I can play games same as the people who do not like Esteban's Zahori circuit.
But the difference is I do like his Zahori circuit.
And I can see very well that the Zahori has the digital filter in it, which makes it as a Zahori, and not a plain charge detector.
Esteban knew this too. You can see the two circuits Esteban posted were both using 50/60 Hz filters -- See below:





When I see the LRL experimenters do not like to talk about the Zahori circuit in the Zahori thread, then I think it is ok to make parodies...
My purpose is not to destroy Esteban's thread about the Zahori circuit -- his Zahori discussion was already destroyed long ago by LRL experimenters who did not like it.
My reason to make parodies is to protest against the continuing attempts to hijack Esteban's serious discussion of his 50/60 Hz filtered Zahori project.

The only question I have is: why didn't people make posts about this charge detector and other ion detectors in the thread that we started for these?
Why don't we see these charge detector circuits in the Ivconic's ion detector thread instead of in Esteban's Zahori thread?
Why hijack Esteban's attempt to discuss the Zahori circuit?


Best wishes,
J_P

[Geo]

Hi Geo,

The only question I have is: why didn't people make posts about this charge detector and other ion detectors in the thread that we started for these?
Why don't we see these charge detector circuits in the Ivconic's ion detector thread instead of in Esteban's Zahori thread?
Why hijack Esteban's attempt to discuss the Zahori circuit?


Best wishes,
J_P

Hi J_P.
Realy i don't know

Regards

[GOLDENSKULL]

Hi dear J_Player,

Thanks for your post and design ...

if you like please start a new post for introduce your static charge detector and give me us to share our knowledge to improve it ... ok ?

did you think by this device we can detect gold treasures ?