Testing for signal lines

[Carl-NC]

For years, you have consistently reported the same results on every so called test you say you have conducted. Failure is the only results you have ever reported.

I agree, my results have been consistent.

So, is there any reason to think any biased test you design against me will be any different? Dell

I didn't design this test "against you". I designed it to test people's ability to objectively detect signal lines with L-rods. Not sure why you take this so personally.

If you believe the test to be flawed, please state your objections. These generic "blame Carl" arguments are vapid. Let's hear how you would conduct tests that are of scientific quality. Let's hear how you did conduct these tests, if you ever really did.

- Carl

[Carl-NC]

No I have never used Carl's ABX design, and never suggested that I did. Common logic would question the accuracy of tests using the electronic X factor until it was determined whether or not the added electronic components of the auto switching device would affect the integrity of the signal. But that's only one factor to be considered.

No more so than the power switch.

I am taken back by the mentality that would compare the analogy of using an LRL to that of using a metal detector. That argument is just plain egotistical meaningless garbage. Totally unrealistic thinking.

The comparison was whether they both would work when turned "on," and whether they both would cease working when turned "off." That comparison doesn't seem very unrealistic.

- Carl

[Qiaozhi]

An observation..

Given Dell's recent incisive comments, there are only two possibilities that come to mind:

1. Dell doesn't want to know the truth. Which shows that he has a closed mindset. This is something he has accused skeptics of having on several occassions. Somewhat ironic, as it happens.

2. He already knows the sad truth, that dowsing and signal lines are false concepts. In this case the only conclusion is that he must be perpetrating a scam.

I sincerely hope that possibility #2 is not the reality. My only concern about believing possibility #1 to be correct, is Dell's refusal to attend the Treasure Hunting event and meet with Carl. If he was 100% convinced of the reality of signal lines, then he would have nothing to fear and everything to gain.

Taking a positive view on this, let's say that #2 is incorrect. Then there is only one possible answer. He is simply a deluded person with a pseudoscientific closed mindset, who's head might explode if he learned the truth after so many decades of self-deception.

To quote Dell's own words:
"It's a fact. Denial is self-deception." Dell Winders
and:
"The closed minded 'one size fits all' mentality is not going to work when testing LRL. You continue to doom yourself to failure." Dell

Many a true word .... etc., etc.....