New Year, New LRL

[Geo]

All are simple. Itake the signal from 3 different positions and go at the point where the lines intersecting. After it i use a lrl as Franco's or Alonso's pd or.... to pinpoint the object. Most times i use a metal detector to pinpoint but if the depth is not low then i have a problem. This is the reason that i "play" with other types of lrls, i am looking something for lower depth to pinpoint the buried objects. But i don't need 20m depth, how to dig it???.
A depth of 1m for medium or large objects is enough.

Regards

[Mike(Mont)]

My two cents here. Ask yourself the question "Why won't a locator detect a freshly buried target (below 20 cm)?" And "Why will a locator detect a long-time buried target?" the answer is obvious that the locator is not detecting the target itself but rather the field surrounding the target. My opinion is the Faraday cage test is irrelevant or else the locator would be able to detect a freshly buried target and that doesn't happen even if the locator can pass the Faraday cage test. Below 20cm the field of a freshly buried target is blocked. I don't know all the factors but soil composition and moisture have an effect on how long it takes before the target field builds large enough to be detected. Many people say cosmic rays are a factor. Dell Winders said long ago that conditions started to diminish in the year 1988. If you look on the charts, the cosmic radiation started to decrease right about then.

cosmicrays.oulu.fi

[enjoykin4]

All are simple. Itake the signal from 3 different positions and go at the point where the lines intersecting. After it i use a lrl as Franco's or Alonso's pd or.... to pinpoint the object. Most times i use a metal detector to pinpoint but if the depth is not low then i have a problem. This is the reason that i "play" with other types of lrls, i am looking something for lower depth to pinpoint the buried objects. But i don't need 20m depth, how to dig it???.
A depth of 1m for medium or large objects is enough.

Regards

Geo I don't see triangular configuration of your coils. Your ferrite antenna coil is right behind your front coplanar coil so this means you have very small polar coordinates angle. By the way calculating exact 3D position of target while you are moving (or not moving) using triangulation technique is complicated process and you need very fast and complex digital logic to do it in real-time. I dont see any notebook or android computer to make a math for you.

That triangular schematic procedure had been used one of the best Russian physicist (in that time he was a pupil of 6th class) to estimate correct position of underground nuclear explosion site in Khazakstan in 1960th.... years. Reading data posted in Moscow PRAVDA from 1960th.... from 3 earthquake stations in Sverige (Sweden) , France and Japan and finding intersection point he had successfully estimated correct position of underground blast. When he was explained KGB colonel how he had calculated correct nuclear position - colones couldnt belive it is so simple and took his head with both hands and long time shaked it. This is a Real anegdote from his life. Lately he was working on Russian Cosmic Programm called BURAN.

regards
Enjoykin4

[enjoykin4]

My two cents here. Ask yourself the question "Why won't a locator detect a freshly buried target (below 20 cm)?" And "Why will a locator detect a long-time buried target?" the answer is obvious that the locator is not detecting the target itself but rather the field surrounding the target. My opinion is the Faraday cage test is irrelevant or else the locator would be able to detect a freshly buried target and that doesn't happen even if the locator can pass the Faraday cage test. Below 20cm the field of a freshly buried target is blocked. I don't know all the factors but soil composition and moisture have an effect on how long it takes before the target field builds large enough to be detected. Many people say cosmic rays are a factor. Dell Winders said long ago that conditions started to diminish in the year 1988. If you look on the charts, the cosmic radiation started to decrease right about then.

cosmicrays.oulu.fi

Hello Mike(Mont)

You know - i think you have a right 100500%. Long range locator does not detect the target itself but complex anomaly of the field surrounding the target. It means there exist some kind of interferention pattern around any target not only in soil but also inthe air or even in free space (Vacuum.) Targets like Gold, Silver, Platinum etc.... can be illuminated naturaly with positive and negatives nodes via divergence of Vector Magnetic Potential (Нscalr* = -divA) with complex cubic structure of Hartman ’s lattice network.

Example of network

http://ecocentre.am/wp-content/uploads/Geoch/Publ/Public/20Radon_as_Indication_of_Hartmanns_Lattice_Network_and_the_Dynamics_of_Solar-Terrestrial_Relationship.pdf

Materialization of k,t and DI structure (cubic lattice) in atmosphere recorded in South Ossetia several years ago.



Satellite records from ISS - atmosphere structure materialization

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03_YivC59XA

Best regards
enjoykin4

[enjoykin4]

[enjoykin4]

Mike(mont)

Important thing is complex Hartman ’s lattice network exist not only in earth atmosphere but also in oceans , seas, lakes, rivers, ground, deep underground - very probably in the space till some distance.



All of these data give us very interesting conclusion that our planet Midgard-Earth (Midgard is Cosmic name of our planet) has complex crystal structure and many substructures - some kind of complex fractal chiral symmetry .... like a giant energetic diamond with a lot of small diamonds (energetic nodes and subnodes at sublevels) and more additional recursive sub-sub nodes of sublevels structure (parent-child hierarchy).

Example of complex dynamics of interferention patterns - quadratic nonlinear waves






Regards
Enjoykin4

[Mike(Mont)]

I plead ignorance. I don't know anything about the Hartmann Grid. i know there are some vortices that probably pull in some cosmic rays. I also know cosmic rays are unpolarized. I also know during times of strong solar activity, the cosmic rays are deflected away from the earth. So i suspect they work something like light waves when they hit a molecule and excite it.

[Mike(Mont)]

Geo, how goes your project?

[Geo]

I fixed it but no free time to go out to check it!!!
Some days i am busy, other days is raining....

[Mike(Mont)]

Does it need to be dry soil?

[Geo]

It is better for the magnetic detector....

[WM6]

Some days i am busy, other days is raining....

The same here, but at the end: Nenikḗkamen.

[Geo]

hahaha... i hope!!!!

[BENZINAS]

I am near to finish my project.
Magnetic detector goes very good at field test. It detects a gold coin from 5m far very easy and a silver olate 10x10cm from the same distance. There are problems with the terrain so i can't test the detector from more far but i am sure that it can go at least from 10..15 m.
Problem is the Franco's detector that i have in the bottom of the case. It can't detect the objects even if i"ll move the detector exactly over the buried objects. Also Franco's detector (xtal version) don't works as compass if set the sensitivity at full... maybe it needs more gain, who knows????.... only Franco

Nice work george as always , too many treasures waiting a detector like that to give the freedom they need so many years buried underground and make some people happy , your expirience in that area is pricless and would be helpfull if one day make one for us.....the hunters of gold treasure dream . BENZINAS words and hopes !!!

[Geo]

Hi vageli.
I am happy that i hear you. How are you???