You guy's are right, I did get Max and Robert mixed up
My apologies to Max,what an insult!! Did Robert EVER contribute any technical stuff or just bag on those who did? Yep bringing back memories of his constant sarcastic barbs. Even a child can criticize (that's easy!), it's the sharing of ideas takes work and is the stuff that separates the men from the boy's on this forum.
You guy's are right, I did get Max and Robert mixed up
My apologies to Max,what an insult!! Did Robert EVER contribute any technical stuff or just bag on those who did? Yep bringing back memories of his constant sarcastic barbs. Even a child can criticize (that's easy!), it's the sharing of ideas takes work and is the stuff that separates the men from the boy's on this forum.
Ummm... yes Robert did contribute some technical stuff...
If you recall, he contributed the circuit for the "Robertoro" LRL...
Which led to a series of photos that I submitted showing my construction efforts, and the difficulties I encountered at the beach in the way of distractions that kept me from my second favorite hobby, building treasure machines.
Unfortunately. these photos were removed when Robert was banned.
However, through a miracle of electronics, I am able to re-post the photos showing My construction efforts with the "Robertoro" LRL, and the distractions at the beach....
Pretty funny stuff. Seeing those pictures of the beautiful women brings something to mind-there's no women on this forum
I've worked with some pretty foxy female engineers as well as technicians in my career so I know there out there,they just haven't discovered Carl's forum for some reason.
Your pictures brought me some memories too, the soldering iron you show is very similar to my first one, i was 10 or 12 and this was the only way i got to solder my first components.
The only difference is that i used a small tube (from a pen or something) to bring the gas farther and close to the tip.Of course doing so i needed another lighter to "ignite" the system...
AND, i was already getting girl´s atention too.
Regards,
Fred.
they just haven't discovered Carl's forum for some reason.
These forums aren't just for electronics, but metal detector electronics. If my math is correct, statistically there are only 6 women in the whole world interested in this, and one of them works at White's. So where are the other 5?
On eb*y right now there is a long range camera that states it can find near surface gold using post processing. Company is out of Australia and is there any input on these devices? Are they bogus?
This is a scam run by "Ranger-Tell", a.k.a. Vincent Blanes. He's selling several scam devices on eBay. I own 2 of his "Examiner" LRLs and they are an absolute joke... a calculator taped to a dowsing rod.
I own the RT examiner and it worked for me. So much so, that I found that their aproach is just a tip of the iceberg containing tons of info and possibilities. Their aproach is just a seed that led me to develop a full electronic and powerful LRL system.
The first thing I found years ago with the RT examiner was a silver ring. Then came other more 'valuable ' stuff.
Try it and decide for yourself. Don't take our words. It will either work for you or not.
About the maxfynd camera, I don't know if it works, but the concept is true and I'm working on the same technology right now.
Regards.
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
Hung is right, don't take our word for it. Contact the seller, ask for references of people who bought the product and actually recovered something with it. Call them and get a detailed report of what it does.
I own the RT examiner and it worked for me. So much so, that I found that their aproach is just a tip of the iceberg containing tons of info and possibilities. Their aproach is just a seed that led me to develop a full electronic and powerful LRL system.
The first thing I found years ago with the RT examiner was a silver ring. Then came other more 'valuable ' stuff.
Try it and decide for yourself. Don't take our words. It will either work for you or not.
About the maxfynd camera, I don't know if it works, but the concept is true and I'm working on the same technology right now.
Regards.
Earth to Hung!
You are either seriously technically-challenged, or part of the wallet mining brigade.
The RT-Examiner is simply a very poor attempt to deceive those with minimal or no technical knowledge. No one in their right mind could possibly believe that a cheap calculator taped to a swivel handle could detect anything but gravity (and occasional wallets). And don't tell me that I don't understand the physics behind this so-called LRL, as I wrote the spoof article of the RT, that you sent to Ranger Tell, and they actually posted it on their website. How gullible ... just like their customers.
Same thing for the camera, if you look at the feedback you will see positive one only for usual stuff,and the less positive one are "private".
aparently is´t just a $200 camera with a ir filter sold $800.Then they use the autofocus thing to "spot" places.
It appear more and more obvious to me (Yes Mr Q ) that any random signalling device will work fine for LRL.
First of all I'm not involved with RT (or any LRL corp) either technically, financially or whatever.
I agree LRLs are priced unbelieveably high. The present RT unit can be built for less than $5.
But if LRL manufacturers include their developed concept in the final price, this could justify the increase in price. But not at the present values which are displayed over the internet.
In the case of RT, the increase in price is due to the main elements of the device which are the table of frequencies and the equations to be input in the calculator to make the functions work.
Secondly, a calculator glued over the antenna is inducing the circuit. The calculator is the signal generator, and every amateur engineer knows the calculator value displays in the LCD input frequencies. If some here refute that they need to be aware of it as their ignorance escapes common sense.
Third, according to RT's site, they hit more than 3,000 customers along the time. Imagine 3,000 anggry customers rioting in front of RT' place. They would have probably burned the house down by now and you would have known about in CNN.
So, don't come with this non sense talk that it's ideomotor or t's a scam. These statements are the true BS.
I know many RT users and they confirm it works and their findings.
Last, I don't know if the camera works. Could be trough infrared, or something else. Fact is this concept is highly plausible as I know now.
Regards.
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
If it was actually involved in the "finding" of a target you were looking for; all that proves is that a bent coat hanger would have found the same target.
If you actually paid for the Examiner, and didn't receive it as a gift in return for pushing it here on Geotech, then you have been the victim of a grand LRL hoax, like all the rest who bought that worthless contraption.
The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
Comment