dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL

[Theseus]

Dell Omnitron is still in business judging from their web page and Dell's claim of a 3-month backlog. Does this mean Omnitron porducts work?

Best wishes,
J_P

I like your humor.

Being in business(?) for years and able to hawk something is probably not the only defining criteria of a "viable technology". Further, I also feel it is an insult to real technology to hint that perhaps what Dell is selling is even related to "a technology".

But I'm glad you mentioned his products, because they (or something similar) have been around since about the late 60s or early 70s. They were a scam then and today they are still a scam. (BTW, Dell is not the only purveyor of such items dating back that far. I could list them all but it's pointless...)

Basically, when pure snake oil can be marketed, and sold to a select number of technically-challenged individuals, it is really not a measure of the merits (or lack of merits) of the product itself; rather it is a clear indication that our US Justice system contains "holes" and is not a perfect system. (....unfortunately)

Perhaps in the future, the State AGs (or FTC) will have enough time to investigate such items; but for now they have bigger fish to fry.

Look at the bright side... Quadro Tracker is no longer in business and I believe Sniffex is down for the count.

(Incidentally, if Dell makes a response here he is going to want to tell everyone that he has a clean bill of health with the BBB of Florida and zero customer complaints. When judging his retort, one should also remember that he claims his contraptions were utilized in the location of Noah's Ark. You are free to make your own decisions regarding his claims...)

[Max]

Hi Max,
Be careful when using the Dr. Best single chip two antenna LRL. It is very powerful.
Be sure to take precautions shown above from our team's secret bunker experiments so you don't turn into a gold statue.

Best wishes,
J_P

I just hope if I'll turn into a gold statue don't be so ugly and disturbing like it...

Kind regards,
Max

[J_Player]

sure... all he got are stamp sized! Maybe it's cause of that we never see anything useful... apart jokes about them.

I'm reconsidering Dr. Best ultimate single chip two antennas... as more realistic LRL!

Kind regards,
Max

Hi Max,
Be careful when using the Dr. Best single chip two antenna LRL. It is very powerful.
Be sure to take precautions shown above from our team's secret bunker experiments so you don't turn into a gold statue.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Max]

The image I post is not 2 box, is a kind of PI with 2 coils. Is a reference about how many info is sleeping... or fogotten technology. And no, I don't use transmitter, actual magnetic absorptive type I use. But also sometimes I use oscillator (coil, of course, a kind of transmitter), but in mode resonance-off.

And he don't understand the difference between a two-box and an ib detector... good.

What else ?

My wc siphon is a suitable antenna for LRLs ???

Am I making jokes again ? Or am I serious ???

Kind regards,
Max

[Max]

Is too big to fit on envelope for mailing. Can someone reduce it to half size?

Best wishes,
J_P

sure... all he got are stamp sized! Maybe it's cause of that we never see anything useful... apart jokes about them.

I'm reconsidering Dr. Best ultimate single chip two antennas... as more realistic LRL!

Kind regards,
Max

[Max]

ALERT !

Stamp sized schematic diagram in view !

what a big news from him!

[J_Player]

Yes, in my previous research concerning these published circuits, I have come across similar schematics. My experience has been that just because schematics like this were published, does not by default make them a lucrative method to use; especially today.

Common sense tells me that if these circuits were around in 1926, and IF they were actually that useful in doing what is claimed, than certainly the theory of operation along with the technology would not have died, but would have been advanced along with all the other electronic and technical devices that evolved in a similar nature. By that I mean we would see these advanced devices in use today. (Actually, the modern-day MDs evolved, probably from something similar to what you posted.)

For instance, say an article was published in the 1900s showing how to talk over a length of two wires utilizing a carbon microphone and a headset consisting of a magnetic transducer. Further assume this device was called the Electromagnetic Telephone. Now over 100 years later, the device must have had some actual merit, because the world literally revolves around the telephone for instant communication. Plus, technology has advanced so that I can carry a telephone in my shirt pocket.

Now let's say someone else published an article in the 1900s extolling the virtues of exposing the human body to certain frequencies and claiming that each malady of the human body would respond to a particular frequency and would be eradicated by the exposure from his frequency device. Let's call this fellow Dr. Fife. Today, over 100 years later, the idea, the device and indeed all traces of the procedure are gone. The idea was bogus; without merit or provable results. In fact, people attempting to treat other people with such devices have been sued and removed from business.

I hope you can understand the analogy I am trying to convey here... and why I am doing it.

Dell Omnitron is still in business judging from their web page and Dell's claim of a 3-month backlog. Does this mean Omnitron porducts work?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Theseus]

No, I don't use this, but similar was used first time in 1959 (the year I born!) with 6L6 tube in transmitter. This is of 1926 magazine Science & Invention. But this was the base. The actual size of pic I have is this. But in the book of Santschi (maybe the first book about MD) maybe is better resolution. Need time for to find in wich CD (pdf) I have it...

Yes, in my previous research concerning these published circuits, I have come across similar schematics. My experience has been that just because schematics like this were published, does not by default make them a lucrative method to use; especially today.

Common sense tells me that if these circuits were around in 1926, and IF they were actually that useful in doing what is claimed, than certainly the theory of operation along with the technology would not have died, but would have been advanced along with all the other electronic and technical devices that evolved in a similar nature. By that I mean we would see these advanced devices in use today. (Actually, the modern-day MDs evolved, probably from something similar to what you posted.)

For instance, say an article was published in the 1900s showing how to talk over a length of two wires utilizing a carbon microphone and a headset consisting of a magnetic transducer. Further assume this device was called the Electromagnetic Telephone. Now over 100 years later, the device must have had some actual merit, because the world literally revolves around the telephone for instant communication. Plus, technology has advanced so that I can carry a telephone in my shirt pocket.

Now let's say someone else published an article in the 1900s extolling the virtues of exposing the human body to certain frequencies and claiming that each malady of the human body would respond to a particular frequency and would be eradicated by the exposure from his frequency device. Let's call this fellow Dr. Fife. Today, over 100 years later, the idea, the device and indeed all traces of the procedure are gone. The idea was bogus; without merit or provable results. In fact, people attempting to treat other people with such devices have been sued and removed from business.

I hope you can understand the analogy I am trying to convey here... and why I am doing it.

[Esteban]

No, i mean the actual PD,
If you show an early two-box working with a transmitter and receiver, maybe your PD if working on the same principle , with the help of an external transmitter?

The image I post is not 2 box, is a kind of PI with 2 coils. Is a reference about how many info is sleeping... or fogotten technology. And no, I don't use transmitter, actual magnetic absorptive type I use. But also sometimes I use oscillator (coil, of course, a kind of transmitter), but in mode resonance-off.

[Fred]

Don't know in wich frequency works the electronic LRL made here in 1959. I remember that I post original hand-drawing of elements in wood base... forgotten?

No, i mean the actual PD,
If you show an early two-box working with a transmitter and receiver, maybe your PD if working on the same principle , with the help of an external transmitter?

[Esteban]

First detector before Dr. Fischer. Pulse induction? With 2 coils (2 detectors in one!), made by afficionated. Pure electric MD. 1921. Many forgotten infos! Reinventing the wheel...

[Esteban]

I remember the picture Esteban.

Does this mean the PD relies on external transmissions on the 60khz range to work?

Regards,
Fred.

Don't know in wich frequency works the electronic LRL made here in 1959. I remember that I post original hand-drawing of elements in wood base... forgotten?

[Esteban]

Radio prosecting, for metals?... maybe

[Fred]

I remember the picture Esteban.

Does this mean the PD relies on external transmissions on the 60khz range to work?

Regards,
Fred.

[Esteban]

This issue.