dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL

[Fred]

ALERT !

Stamp sized schematic diagram in view !

[J_Player]

ALERT !

Stamp sized schematic diagram in view !

Is too big to fit on envelope for mailing. Can someone reduce it to half size?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Esteban]

Have you ever, or are you currently using an LRL such as is described in your attachment?

I don't mean similar, I mean exactly those circuits?

No, I don't use this, but similar was used first time in 1959 (the year I born!) with 6L6 tube in transmitter. This is of 1926 magazine Science & Invention. But this was the base. The actual size of pic I have is this. But in the book of Santschi (maybe the first book about MD) maybe is better resolution. Need time for to find in wich CD (pdf) I have it...

[Esteban]

This issue.

[Fred]

I remember the picture Esteban.

Does this mean the PD relies on external transmissions on the 60khz range to work?

Regards,
Fred.

[Esteban]

Radio prosecting, for metals?... maybe

[Esteban]

I remember the picture Esteban.

Does this mean the PD relies on external transmissions on the 60khz range to work?

Regards,
Fred.

Don't know in wich frequency works the electronic LRL made here in 1959. I remember that I post original hand-drawing of elements in wood base... forgotten?

[Esteban]

First detector before Dr. Fischer. Pulse induction? With 2 coils (2 detectors in one!), made by afficionated. Pure electric MD. 1921. Many forgotten infos! Reinventing the wheel...

[Fred]

Don't know in wich frequency works the electronic LRL made here in 1959. I remember that I post original hand-drawing of elements in wood base... forgotten?

No, i mean the actual PD,
If you show an early two-box working with a transmitter and receiver, maybe your PD if working on the same principle , with the help of an external transmitter?

[Esteban]

No, i mean the actual PD,
If you show an early two-box working with a transmitter and receiver, maybe your PD if working on the same principle , with the help of an external transmitter?

The image I post is not 2 box, is a kind of PI with 2 coils. Is a reference about how many info is sleeping... or fogotten technology. And no, I don't use transmitter, actual magnetic absorptive type I use. But also sometimes I use oscillator (coil, of course, a kind of transmitter), but in mode resonance-off.

[Theseus]

No, I don't use this, but similar was used first time in 1959 (the year I born!) with 6L6 tube in transmitter. This is of 1926 magazine Science & Invention. But this was the base. The actual size of pic I have is this. But in the book of Santschi (maybe the first book about MD) maybe is better resolution. Need time for to find in wich CD (pdf) I have it...

Yes, in my previous research concerning these published circuits, I have come across similar schematics. My experience has been that just because schematics like this were published, does not by default make them a lucrative method to use; especially today.

Common sense tells me that if these circuits were around in 1926, and IF they were actually that useful in doing what is claimed, than certainly the theory of operation along with the technology would not have died, but would have been advanced along with all the other electronic and technical devices that evolved in a similar nature. By that I mean we would see these advanced devices in use today. (Actually, the modern-day MDs evolved, probably from something similar to what you posted.)

For instance, say an article was published in the 1900s showing how to talk over a length of two wires utilizing a carbon microphone and a headset consisting of a magnetic transducer. Further assume this device was called the Electromagnetic Telephone. Now over 100 years later, the device must have had some actual merit, because the world literally revolves around the telephone for instant communication. Plus, technology has advanced so that I can carry a telephone in my shirt pocket.

Now let's say someone else published an article in the 1900s extolling the virtues of exposing the human body to certain frequencies and claiming that each malady of the human body would respond to a particular frequency and would be eradicated by the exposure from his frequency device. Let's call this fellow Dr. Fife. Today, over 100 years later, the idea, the device and indeed all traces of the procedure are gone. The idea was bogus; without merit or provable results. In fact, people attempting to treat other people with such devices have been sued and removed from business.

I hope you can understand the analogy I am trying to convey here... and why I am doing it.

[J_Player]

Yes, in my previous research concerning these published circuits, I have come across similar schematics. My experience has been that just because schematics like this were published, does not by default make them a lucrative method to use; especially today.

Common sense tells me that if these circuits were around in 1926, and IF they were actually that useful in doing what is claimed, than certainly the theory of operation along with the technology would not have died, but would have been advanced along with all the other electronic and technical devices that evolved in a similar nature. By that I mean we would see these advanced devices in use today. (Actually, the modern-day MDs evolved, probably from something similar to what you posted.)

For instance, say an article was published in the 1900s showing how to talk over a length of two wires utilizing a carbon microphone and a headset consisting of a magnetic transducer. Further assume this device was called the Electromagnetic Telephone. Now over 100 years later, the device must have had some actual merit, because the world literally revolves around the telephone for instant communication. Plus, technology has advanced so that I can carry a telephone in my shirt pocket.

Now let's say someone else published an article in the 1900s extolling the virtues of exposing the human body to certain frequencies and claiming that each malady of the human body would respond to a particular frequency and would be eradicated by the exposure from his frequency device. Let's call this fellow Dr. Fife. Today, over 100 years later, the idea, the device and indeed all traces of the procedure are gone. The idea was bogus; without merit or provable results. In fact, people attempting to treat other people with such devices have been sued and removed from business.

I hope you can understand the analogy I am trying to convey here... and why I am doing it.

Dell Omnitron is still in business judging from their web page and Dell's claim of a 3-month backlog. Does this mean Omnitron porducts work?

Best wishes,
J_P

[Max]

ALERT !

Stamp sized schematic diagram in view !

what a big news from him!

[Max]

Is too big to fit on envelope for mailing. Can someone reduce it to half size?

Best wishes,
J_P

sure... all he got are stamp sized! Maybe it's cause of that we never see anything useful... apart jokes about them.

I'm reconsidering Dr. Best ultimate single chip two antennas... as more realistic LRL!

Kind regards,
Max

[Max]

The image I post is not 2 box, is a kind of PI with 2 coils. Is a reference about how many info is sleeping... or fogotten technology. And no, I don't use transmitter, actual magnetic absorptive type I use. But also sometimes I use oscillator (coil, of course, a kind of transmitter), but in mode resonance-off.

And he don't understand the difference between a two-box and an ib detector... good.

What else ?

My wc siphon is a suitable antenna for LRLs ???

Am I making jokes again ? Or am I serious ???

Kind regards,
Max