You have your data, and also I have data regarding electronic LRLs and MDs. If you assume that all I have been posted since my own experience (and words) of years in this field is not valid, you justify me why I don't wish to present schematic(s).
Just because I don't understand.... does not mean someone else here could not have a better understanding. No excuse not to post your schematics for them, not me.
The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
Observable, don't know... but measurable (detectable) with coils or antenna yes... the "phenomenon" is distortion of magnetic fields associated with chemical process, corrossion, particles migration, etc., that forms also an electric field (deppend of the size), also capable for to detect via RF.
In one word ???
Whatever.
Attached Files
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason "
Just because I don't understand.... does not mean someone else here could not have a better understanding. No excuse not to post your schematics for them, not me.
What schematic you want ?
PD ?
To make what ?
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason "
The "phenomenon" is not from a column of ions that is 7.2 feet in the air holding its position above the buried metal?
J_P
But if it is only column of ions, vertical, what about horizontal detection (this is the real purpose of electronic LRL, and depth), what causes that the "phenomenon" is detectable 30-90 meters in horizontal? Damásio and Alonso comprobe the verticality (column) over a chair and (because the "phenomenon" going more above) over a stairs. This comprobation they made 25 years ago, maybe before technology of today that uses the ions for to find metal into Earth.
But if it is only column of ions, vertical, what about horizontal detection (this is the real purpose of electronic LRL, and depth), what causes that the "phenomenon" is detectable 30-90 meters in horizontal? Damásio and Alonso comprobe the verticality (column) over a chair and (because the "phenomenon" going more above) over a stairs. This comprobation they made 25 years ago, maybe before technology of today that uses the ions for to find metal into Eart.
The answer is simple. What they detected was not ions, but a different a secondary effect from the buried metal. It is not possible for a cloud of ions to remain stationary in the air whether above something buried or not. As soon as a small breeze blows, the ions will blow away with the wind too. But Gold ions do not exist in a stationary location in the air. They exist in extremely small trace amounts that are scattered all over the air, and cannot be measured with any normal instruments. Special measuring methods must be used to find any gold in the air. And most of it is particulate, not ions. Similar to the trace amount of gold that is found in sea water. It has only been measured by special instruments because it is in such rare trace amounts.
Now, look at the signal that LRL believers are reporting. The "phenomenon" is strong... can burn transistors. Was measured on stairs...
Ions in the open air cannot burn transistors in a metal detector. But a strong enough electric field or magnetic field at a coil could do that. Maybe a secondary effect could cause a response to a detector at those locations, But I think not ions in the air. This is also not hard to prove. First, What proof do Damásio and Alonso have that what they were measuring is ions? Did they prove it they found a column of ions up to 7.2 feet? Or did they prove they recorded some response up to 7.2 feet? What method did they use to identify the response they recorded was caused by ions located in the air? Is it possible they simply assumed the signal was caused by the ions, but did not take an ion sample to prove it? Are you aware that scientists have already proved that the small trace of metal ions in the soil become neutralized before they reach the surface of the ground? Only Mineoro is claiming a concentration of gold ions are remaining in the air, but they have never shown proof using a standard test instrument to prove it.
This is simple to prove... Go to the location where the strong signal is located in the air 7.2 feet above the ground and take the air sample through a drift tube to measure actual ions. This instrument will not respond to other signals that Alonso's machine sees, only ions. You will quickly find that there are no measurable gold ions or other metal ions there other than a few trace random ones that may blow by. You will see the drift tube is very accurate for finding a concentration of gold ions. You will also find it does not report anything more than small amounts of scattered trace ions which are the same in open air above the buried metal as away from it.
The answer is simple. What they detected was not ions, but a different a secondary effect from the buried metal. It is not possible for a cloud of ions to remain stationary in the air whether above something buried or not. As soon as a small breeze blows, the ions will blow away with the wind too. But Gold ions do not exist in a stationary location in the air. They exist in extremely small trace amounts that are scattered all over the air, and cannot be measured with any normal instruments. Special measuring methods must be used to find any gold in the air. And most of it is particulate, not ions. Similar to the trace amount of gold that is found in sea water. It has only been measured by special instruments because it is in such rare trace amounts.
Now, look at the signal that LRL believers are reporting. The "phenomenon" is strong... can burn transistors. Was measured on stairs...
Ions in the open air cannot burn transistors in a metal detector. But a strong enough electric field or magnetic field at a coil could do that. Maybe a secondary effect could cause a response to a detector at those locations, But I think not ions in the air. This is also not hard to prove. First, What proof do Damásio and Alonso have that what they were measuring is ions? Did they prove it they found a column of ions up to 7.2 feet? Or did they prove they recorded some response up to 7.2 feet? What method did they use to identify the response they recorded was caused by ions located in the air? Is it possible they simply assumed the signal was caused by the ions, but did not take an ion sample to prove it? Are you aware that scientists have already proved that the small trace of metal ions in the soil become neutralized before they reach the surface of the ground? Only Mineoro is claiming a concentration of gold ions are remaining in the air, but they have never shown proof using a standard test instrument to prove it.
This is simple to prove... Go to the location where the strong signal is located in the air 7.2 feet above the ground and take the air sample through a drift tube to measure actual ions. This instrument will not respond to other signals that Alonso's machine sees, only ions. You will quickly find that there are no measurable gold ions or other metal ions there other than a few trace random ones that may blow by. You will see the drift tube is very accurate for finding a concentration of gold ions. You will also find it does not report anything more than small amounts of scattered trace ions which are the same in open air above the buried metal as away from it.
This is easy to prove.. why not try?
Best wishes,
J_P
How naive...
It this was so, every time wind would blow, also electrons would vanish and your favorite radio station 'would be lost' for sometime.
Do you loose that signal?
You need to read Mineoro's explanation 4 times more. This time memorize the sentences and use glasses. If this was a school test, you would grade F...
"Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
It this was so, every time wind would blow, also electrons would vanish and your favorite radio station 'would be lost' for sometime.
Do you loose that signal?
Wow! Are you ever confused!
You need to go back to the basics, and read about Wave Propagation, how it's done and what is involved.
The Wallet-Miner's Creed
Why bother with the truth, when it doesn't suit the argument?
It this was so, every time wind would blow, also electrons would vanish and your favorite radio station 'would be lost' for sometime.
Do you loose that signal?
You need to read Mineoro's explanation 4 times more. This time memorize the sentences and use glasses. If this was a school test, you would grade F...
Hi hung,
I can't read the Mineoro page because my anti-virus alert will not let me load their page. But I saved a graphic of their idea for gold ions moving up in the air 7.2 feet above a buried treasure before my previous installation of Windows crashed. So I know they showed 7.2 feet in the air.
But they did not talk about how blowing wind can cause electrons to vanish and cause my favorite radio station to be lost. Is this your idea?
I know you understand a lot about radio wave transmission. I learned from you the principle of the RangerTell for find treasure with an RF carrier: "This is the principle in which the Rangertell Examiner works. Resonance to the elements subatomic levels when a carrier signal line is shot and returned".
Can you explain the dynamics of rising gold ions 7.2 feet in the air above buried gold for me?
Comment