rangertell examiner field trials

[WM6]

Then to indicate where is the treasure:
"On being amplified by the circuitry in the Examiner the magnetic laws govern its disposition for it to align with the target's direction".

I hope the explanation from the manual helps.

J_P

Thanks, it helps a lot. But now I understand that this creation is much more complex and sophisticated than I assumed.

[Fred]

This guy took the patent of RT and makes the same detectors ...

A patent of a RT ? where?


Amazing work J-P , i found very interesting the way to hold the "pickup" coils and the crystal connected (in serial) with it.

Every working TV set has an oscillator running on that frequency, do they talk about interference from TV´s when using the RT ?
Fortunately i don´t see many wires that can move around during shipping.Maybe this is why they don´t need to use packing peanuts...

[hung]

Hi g-sani,

I can't tell you anything about field performance for the Examiner. But I can tell you something about what's inside of them. The earlier version that Carl-NC showed photos of is no longer being made. There was a newer diodes model that was also finally updated to the present model. The basic model being sold today is the Examiner T-G version 8.08B for a special sale price of $421 US. You can see this on the products page at the Rangertell website.

I received an email from Rangertell giving approval open this T-G version 8.08B Examiner and post photos of what I see inside.
I have no test data to show yet, but have fun seeing how the new ones look inside:

Hey bigmouth, so there's indeed a diode as I had stated eh ??

[J_Player]

Hey bigmouth, so there's indeed a diode as I had stated eh ??

I don't see a diode connected to the pot as you stated. I am reading the report where you made the claims you opened yours and took meter measurements inside.

I am wondering what readings you took inside where the diode is connected to the pot. I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside. It looks easy to take readings inside to me. Were you making up a story? Was this more fake testing you pretended to do? Is this why you had to wait until you found anther way to connect a meter without breaking the enclosure?

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=63618

Best wishes,
J_P

[hung]

I don't see a diode connected to the pot as you stated. I am reading the report where you made the claims you opened yours and took meter measurements inside.

I am wondering what readings you took inside where the diode is connected to the pot. I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside. It looks easy to take readings inside to me. Were you making up a story? Was this more fake testing you pretended to do? Is this why you had to wait until you found anther way to connect a meter without breaking the enclosure?

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=63618

Best wishes,
J_P

1 - In my model there's a diode conected to the pot. It requires 1 single neuron for a geek to figure there are several modifications employed along RT years. doohh!

2 - If I had not opened my examiner I would never be able to apply my mod.
In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

This case is closed to me. I will not waste my time beating your dead horse here.

Gotta go.

[WM6]

I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside.

J_P

Measurement contact was done on brass rod from downside:

Such "phenomenon" can be measured inside buildings on all LC circuit, there do not need calculator to be present.

Are you open calculator too, to prove if some mod was done?

[WM6]

In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

.

Read first then accuse!

J_P clarify before photos:

"I received an email from Rangertell giving approval open this T-G version 8.08B Examiner and post photos of what I see inside.
I have no test data to show yet, but have fun seeing how the new ones look inside: "

But you have ethics to sell nonworking boxes to naive? Great ethics!

[g-sani]

Probably this is the only truth, dear g-sani.

About Christmas my best frieds, whom I believe, say to me, that he saw Santa inside BigMarkt. It is hard to believe to me and I wish to convince myself about this tale story.

And, yes, what electric shock, I saw Santa in BigMarkt too. I didnt want to touch his beard and mustache because he was on other property. But after that some other people told to me that they saw Santa at the same place too. No one pull his beard and mustache down because of other property.

Now I firmly believe in Santa.

You will never be able to understand the point that somebody else makes WM6 because you consider your self more clever than anybody.
To see things doesn't mean that all you have to do is to keep your eyes open.
You are oversuspicious whith everything and everybody and this will result of yourself being at the same low level for ever.Be generous for once in your life WM6, you must give first in order to receive.
Well thats your choice and you can always keep sleeping.
Of course you can always dream of Santa Claus as you always do since the day you were a child.
But watch out WM6 don't dream of him having presents(treasure) in his bag since you will never see a treasure yourself the way you go.

P.S. Don't worry about the gold inside that property my friend.
I checked it whith my X3 not to prove that my LRL or that guy's LRL is working but only because time has come for
that gold to be picked up from somebody.

[J_Player]

1 - In my model there's a diode conected to the pot. It requires 1 single neuron for a geek to figure there are several modifications employed along RT years. doohh!

2 - If I had not opened my examiner I would never be able to apply my mod.
In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

This case is closed to me. I will not waste my time beating your dead horse here.

Gotta go.

Hi hung.
There is no question of ethics in showing the inside of an Examiner. Rangertell sent an approval to show the photos you see above. They don't mind if you show photos of the inside and show what variances you measure on the meter readings you get. You realise of course many people don't believe you ever made meter readings inside your Examiner showing variances.

As far as the mod you claimed to make on your Examiner, you said the only mod you made was to stop the handle from swiveling. It is not necessary to open an Examiner to stop the handle from swiveling. But even if you opened it to stop the handle from swiveling or other mods, you still did not show any meter readings that indicate variances inside at the diode connected to the pot like you claimed you did.

I can see why you are anxious to close this matter.

Best wishes,
J_P

[WM6]

You will never be able to understand the point that somebody else makes WM6 because you consider your self more clever than anybody.
To see things doesn't mean that all you have to do is to keep your eyes open.
You are oversuspicious whith everything and everybody and this will result of yourself being at the same low level for ever.Be generous for once in your life WM6, you must give first in order to receive.
Well thats your choice and you can always keep sleeping.
Of course you can always dream of Santa Claus as you always do since the day you were a child.
But watch out WM6 don't dream of him having presents(treasure) in his bag since you will never see a treasure yourself the way you go.

Thanks for compliments, g-sani, but compliments are not arguments, that your point of view is correct. In contrary its lack of arguments.

[Theseus]

Hi hung.
There is no question of ethics in showing the inside of an Examiner. Rangertell sent an approval to show the photos you see above. They don't mind if you show photos of the inside and show what variances you measure on the meter readings you get. You realise of course many people don't believe you ever made meter readings inside your Examiner showing variances.

As far as the mod you claimed to make on your Examiner, you said the only mod you made was to stop the handle from swiveling. It is not necessary to open an Examiner to stop the handle from swiveling. But even if you opened it to stop the handle from swiveling or other mods, you still did not show any meter readings that indicate variances inside at the diode connected to the pot like you claimed you did.

I can see why you are anxious to close this matter.

Best wishes,
J_P

It's the old "duck and cover" routine. Most all LRL aficionados have some sort of a run and hide plan in place when cornered with facts and truth they can't debunker.

[Theseus]

Hi g-sani,

I can't tell you anything about field performance for the Examiner. But I can tell you something about what's inside of them. The earlier version that Carl-NC showed photos of is no longer being made. There was a newer diodes model that was also finally updated to the present model. The basic model being sold today is the Examiner T-G version 8.08B for a special sale price of $421 US. You can see this on the products page at the Rangertell website.

I received an email from Rangertell giving approval open this T-G version 8.08B Examiner and post photos of what I see inside.
I have no test data to show yet, but have fun seeing how the new ones look inside:

Kind of sorry you took it apart prior to the testing. If the testing actually ever happens, isn't there a good chance this action can be used "as an excuse" if the test results are less than glowing?

[J_Player]

Kind of sorry you took it apart prior to the testing. If the testing actually ever happens, isn't there a good chance this action can be used "as an excuse" if the test results are less than glowing?

Hi Theseus,
I don't think so. I was cautioned not to move the wires inside, and I was very careful about this. From my recent observations, I think the problem is not with moved wires. I think the best operation will be found after some time-consuming adjistments to the tuning cap, which I was told must be moved a hair at a time. I expect this to be very time consuming based on my first few attempts, that included several other things to be adjusted to various settings after each setting at the cap. Of course, I am only guessing the tuning cap is the problem at this point. But if people begin complaining that any testing is void because it was opened, then I can return it for a replacement that is never opened.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Fred]

Is this capacitor tuning necessary?
In their adverts they say a child can use it, and that it is not complicated , so i don´t think you will find any difficulty.

[Theseus]

Is this capacitor tuning necessary?
In their adverts they say a child can use it, and that it is not complicated , so i don´t think you will find any difficulty.

Seems we are getting two different versions of this story. The way J_Player states, I hardly think a child could work through the setup procedure, and probably a lot of ordinary users, either.