H3Tec discussion

[Tim Williams]

J-player What do you think of gravity communications?

http://gravity-control.blogspot.com/2006/04/electrogravitic-communications-means.html

Just a thought

[J_Player]

J-player What do you think of gravity communications?

http://gravity-control.blogspot.com/2006/04/electrogravitic-communications-means.html

Just a thought

I think gravity communications is another excellent topic to bring to the irrelevant H3Tec discussions alongside the question of the existence and dimensions of the universe, how far a 1 micro volt signal can travel, silver dollars and plywood, liars on TNet, weather, and the location of a missing thread.

Best wishes,
J_P

[hung]

J-player What do you think of gravity communications?

http://gravity-control.blogspot.com/2006/04/electrogravitic-communications-means.html

Just a thought

Hello Tim,

Your answer lies here, in Dr. Berman's post:

WELL, YOU ARE FINALLY WAKING-UP ( YOUR HUNDRED YEARS SLEEP..TESLA ), GATES' AND ALLEN OF MICROSCOFT OWN SETI ( SETI@HOME, THE PHENIOX PROJECT...AND HAS FILED FOR PATENT BASED ON RT COMMUNICATION, BASED OWN OUR RESEARCH AND DR. GREG HODOWANEC ( A FRIEND AND COLLEGUE FOR 10 YEARS ) WHO IS THE FATHER OF MODERN RHYSMONIC COSMOLOGY, THE ONLY MAJOR EXPERT IN TESLAN REAL-TIME ( PHASE CONJUGATE ) COMMUNICATION BASED ON TESLA ANALOG LONGITUNIAL BI-WAVE THEORY....

...and here, answering this question by Joey:

If gravity travels at the speed of light, how do black holes have gravity, since their escape velocities are faster than the speed of light?

If you know what gravity really is, you will answer the above easily.

However this does not seem to be your forum pal's case tough.
If he does not know to date how a LRL works, he will do much, much less about gravity itself.

Best regards and success for the Arc Geo Logger.

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

Morming J-Player mi buddy: Bk. You posted my question -->how far a 1 micro volt signal can travel,
*********

Now 'that' is a very important question, especially if we are discusing theory of LrL's possibly working. It would be possibly the key to LrL recepton, since today we are extremely limited on reception, on both distance and sensitiveness through the conventional cummunication spectrum and reproductive devices.

The trained human mind is potentially one of the most sensitive receivers in the universe in certain phases. However we are now starting to investigate other biological forms as receptors.

Sinple sprouting beans will indicate local harmful, and accumulated radiation, far more accurately than any mechanical or chemical indicators so far. Especially when it is conidered what a broad range that radiation covers.

It is extremely important to remember, or to visualize, the infitesimally minute energies that we are discusing, which may be useful for successful LrL opertion.

Don Jose de La Mancha



.

[WM6]

Morming J-Player mi buddy: Bk. You posted my question -->how far a 1 micro volt signal can travel,
*********

The trained human mind is potentially one of the most sensitive receivers in the universe in certain phases. However we are now starting to investigate other biological forms as receptors.

This most sensitive receiver even do not can be trained to receive dangerous and strong earthquake warning signals, let alone to detect gold pieces in soil.

Or you mean that receiver was during evolution someway tunned to gold signals?

Why do evolution need for human to be skilled such way?

[Art3811]

~JP~
I see,
Maybe this is why I don't bother to read the TNet LRL forum.
It is full of lies and whining about who's lying and who's not, but little or no real information worth reading.
It is kind of like reading pages full of a bunch of nothing.
I think Carl said it best: "I dearly wish you would waste your time on TNet rather than here. Unlike some of the other LRL advocates, you bring absolutely nothing to the party".

I suppose if a person loves lies, the TNet LRL forum could be fascinating reading with stars such as Art.

Read and weep…The brass ring made it easy to lead him into making a $25,000 mistake..Art
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.msg2376634.html#msg2376634

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

good morning WM-6: you stated --> This most sensitive receiver even do not can be trained to receive dangerous and strong earthquake warning signals
*********
First, regarding earthquake Frequencies etc., who says that they cannot?? Many, if not all, of the other mobile forms of life do react to them, as well as to others that the human is not notmally receptive to.

What hunan can detect aother of the opposite sex from miles away?? Many insects and animals can. The.lowly moth is one example.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~

You also posted -->Or you mean that receiver was during evolution someway tunned to gold signals?
************

Obvously no, but then where do the Au frequencies lie? as far as I know within the trainable range of the brain. Ultra low. After all, we are quite capable of descriminating between individual specimans of gold.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~

You also posted --> Why do evolution need for human to be skilled such way? ************

None especially for a certain mineral or metal, that I know of, but since it probably lies within the receptible range, why not utilize it?

Don Jose de La Mancha

"I exist to Live, not live to exsit".

[Qiaozhi]

Read and weep…The brass ring made it easy to lead him into making a $25,000 mistake..Art
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,327684.msg2376634.html#msg2376634

This is the very test I would like to see you do, but under randomized blind conditions.

Perhaps it was the part in Carl's post that was marked in bold and underlined that you managed to miss with your highly tuned psychic senses.

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

Hi, one of my usual boo booos. The 'ultra low' in the last post was in reference to earthquakes, not Au. apol.

Don Jose de La Mancha

"I exist to Live, not live to exsist".

[Rudy]

If gravity travels at the speed of light, how do black holes have gravity, since their escape velocities are faster than the speed of light?

Surely Hung, a man of your intellect must know the answer to this apparent conumdrum.

The General Theory of Relativity allows for the gravity of a black hole to be felt outside of it.

The gravity doesn't have to get out of the black hole. General relativity is a local theory, which means that the field at a certain point in spacetime is determined entirely by things going on at places that can communicate with it at speeds less than or equal to c. If a star collapses into a black hole, the gravitational field outside the black hole may be calculated entirely from the properties of the star and its external gravitational field before it becomes a black hole. In this sense the black hole is a kind of "frozen star": the gravitational field is a fossil field. The same is true of the electromagnetic field that a black hole may possess.

Often your question is phrased in terms of gravitons, the hypothetical quanta of spacetime distortion. If things like gravity correspond to the exchange of "particles" like gravitons, how can they get out of the event horizon to do their job?

Gravitons don't exist in general relativity, because GR is not a quantum theory. Gravitons might be part of a theory of quantum gravity when it is completely developed, but even then it might not be best to describe gravitational attraction as produced by virtual gravitons.

Nevertheless, the question in this form is still worth asking, because black holes can have static electric fields, and we know that these may be described in terms of virtual photons. So how do the virtual photons get out of the event horizon? Well, for one thing, they can come from the charged matter prior to collapse, just like classical effects. In addition, virtual particles can go faster than light! Consequently the event horizon, which is really just a surface that moves at the speed of light, presents no barrier to virtual particles.

[Aziz]

Well,

I have a bloody good competitive DIY el-ar-el device for you:
It's outperforming the H3Tech in these cold days however.

You need:
- thermometer
- L shaped wire
- fresh and warm horse sh1t

Take the fresh horse sh1t in your hands. Stick the L rod into the horse sh1t. Stick the thermometer into the horse sh1t as well. Keep attention to the temperature. If the temperature is exactly reading 36.4 °C, then the el-ar-el device is engaged and ready for operation (detection distance at least 100 km). If the temperature is above 36.4 degree C, wait until it is exactly 36.4 degree C (otherwise it will overdrive the el-ar-el device). Below 35.1 degree C, the detection distance suffers a bit (reduced to 10 km). Below 31.1 degree C, you need fresh horse sh1t again.

Some scientists claim, that it will very likely operate with bull sh1t as well. But this claim isn't proofed yet.

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

HI, will fresh burro or a lovely. sexy mule's feces work also?

Don Jose de La Mancha

"I exist to Live, not live to exist".

[Saturna]

HI, will fresh burro or a lovely. sexy mule's feces work also?

Don Jose de La Mancha

Why not ? Seems to dovetail quite nicely with the other ideas you propose.

[hung]

Gravity does not exist as it's sensed.
It's a group of phenomena and not only an individualized force.
It's better explained by the difference in density of bodies. If a body is less dense, there is no gravity that stops it from going up. And the Earth's ethereal layer determines this effect. Also, it's the vertical compoment of magnetism that influences 'gravity'. The atraction it exerts over a body is about the same it does over any other body, thus allowing observation of the same falling speed in vacuum. Only this atraction is not caused by its mass. It's caused by the magnetism every single body pocess.

Remember, light repels matter. One similar occurence of what happens to it in black holes is what was observed by Eddington in 1919 during the Solar eclipse and was comented by Einstein.
But trully, light curved not due to the solar mass, but due to the magnetic field which is zero close to the Sun.
General Relativity is full of holes to effectivelly explain what is going on with black holes. One example. It postulates that if two radii happen to move in a same direction, similar speeds, speed will be zero among them. But if they move in opposite directions, the relative speed will be v+v or 2v.
Einstein stated that if any of the radii move in any direction, their correspondent speeds will be v.
This is false since he atributed a particular, 'proprietary' space and time for each other. He tried to impose limitations for the universe which is infinitum. Space that is not transformed is shapeless and is not relative to anything.
Standard model nonsense... If space is a constant, how can be there any space time continuum and worse, to consider this to be a dimension...

[Don Jose de La Mancha]

allo sat, in the corner: You posted --> Why not ? Seems to dovetail quite nicely with the other ideas you propose.
************

I must admit to staying on subject, and in line with the popular exchange in here, however -----.

Speaking of the subject on hand, I notice that you haven't been posting your usual remarks. why not???

Incidentally, haven't you ever used that materiel fresh from the source to thaw out your hands enough to light a fire? Brrrrrr

Don Jose de La Mancha

"I exist to Live, not live to exist".