H3Tec discussion

[Dave J.]

This is a very grave situation indeed.

Quick, fetch the Thomas Gravitator from the medicine cabinet!

[Qiaozhi]

This pressure is the result of the 'creator's vibration' over an infinite point within the universe and maintains the atmosphere of all planets. And this is very easy to understand.

We can only conclude from your posts that you are either schizophrenic; there is more than one person posting as "Hung"; or you use a lot of cutting and pasting ... or a combination of all three. This is clearly evident in your various posts - ranging from sheer rants to almost lucid.

However, your quote above is yet another demonstration that your ideas are nothing more than a confused and disjointed set of concepts, cobbled together from the ramblings of other pseudo-scientists and search engine results.

What on earth is meant by the "creator's vibration"? Are you now saying that a deity was involved somewhere in your confused view of the universe? What this even has to do with the title of this thread (H3Tec discussion) is anybody's guess. Please also define the meaning of "infinite point within the universe". This is just gobbledygook.

Some people on TNET may be impressed by your ability to string random words together into a sentence (complete with spelling and grammatical errors) but you will have to try much harder here on Geotech ... much much harder.

[WM6]

What on earth is meant by the "creator's vibration"? Are you now saying that a deity was involved somewhere in your confused view of the universe?

It is not about deity. Term originates from Pamela A. She named her vibro-thing "Creator". But Hung forgot that she never use it from remote, so it is not valid as Hungs LRL proof.

[hung]

What on earth is meant by the "creator's vibration"?

The same 'vibration' the creator in 'his' infinite goodness provides for pathetic creatures such as yourself as an opportunity to come to this world to evolve.

[J_Player]

...No, it's not I who state this. It's our friend Math.
The universe.
This is very interesting.
You and some others here, seem to comprehend electronics and physics to some extent. Actually there are no genius among us. We are just human beings who keep learning as we go along.
But there is a difference between you people and some of us. Note that I include others here.
You people think that the amount of physics you know accounts sufficiently to explain everything INCLUDING WHAT CANNOT BE.
This is stupid. This is idiotic. And this only accounts for the IGNORANCE that reigns here.It should exactly be the opposite. You and others here should be the first ones to state and admit honestly that you are not able to make afirmations about certain apparently unexplained phenomena because the physics you know cannot explain.
This would be the honest man position. But no. You try to deny the color TV simply because a B&W set is all you got.
Long range detection of metals is so simple. So silly. Yet you pose this subject as something supernatural.
Poor fellas.

Evolution is happening right now for all quanta beings in this planet, whether you like it or not.
Evolving is an unstoppable process inherent to all beings in this planet.
And this also includes you pal.

What?
Dr. hung is teaching more HungScinece?

Ok... here we go again....

"It's our friend, math"...
Math? As I recall, the hero who you plagiarized your scribblings from is a deposed physicist who was shown to be fraudulently trying to win a Nobel Prize for his ECE theory until it was discovered he does not even know basic math needed to solve matrix equations that a first year physics student knows. Is it any wonder that his theories about physics didn't work, and were ultimately discarded by real physicists some time before he lost his job teaching physics? Can you demonstrate any equipment at all to work in front of skeptical witnesses that uses his theories to accomplish something useful?

Dr. hung claims the theories of Myron Evans and his math are responsible for the underlying principles that prove dowsing and LRLs work. No need to prove it with demonstrations when we have the deposed Myron Evan's theory that is unquestionably correct. But Evans has never been able to demonstrate any useful working mechanism that utilizes his theories... No problem. Hung's research team proved it:

I had a research team which was developing a project which completely have ‘blown’ some accepted standards of quantum mechanics. I will never tell this because besides the fact I’m not allowed to, it’s too much, incredibly dangerous. ...thank God all went fine and stoped in time. What purpose served this? To demonstrate EXACTLY what Evans states in his speech...

From: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...3&postcount=32
Well, he almost proved it. It appears it was too dangerous to talk about the project or the results, but we all know we can trust Hung. What he says is really true. No need for publishing any results or demonstrations.

So we see how "math is our friend" even when the math used to prove the theory is full of mistakes. Of course the final test of demonstrating working equipment to prove the mistaken math and theories really works cannot be shown. It's a secret. So secret that Hung can not even talk about it. (of course he really proved the Evans ECE theory is true with his incredibly dangerous experiments, but he is not allowed to tell, or perhaps he never had a team that worked on a project which proved Evans mistaken theories are really true)?


"Actually there are no genius among us. We are just human beings who keep learning as we go along".
We? Maybe most of us do. But it seems there are a few who never seem to learn unless they can find their information from sources that have been shown to be wrong, using math that does not work to produce theories that cannot work to produce non-working equipment.


Long range detection of metals is so simple. So silly. Yet you pose this subject as something supernatural.
??? More fake BS that Dr. hung will never demonstrate in front of a skeptical witness?


Evolving is an unstoppable process inherent to all beings in this planet.
Actually, I have observed some living organisms regress to a lower life form on occasion.


Best wishes,
J_P

[Qiaozhi]

The same 'vibration' the creator in 'his' infinite goodness provides for pathetic creatures such as yourself as an opportunity to come to this world to evolve.

So this must be the "ranting Hung" that is replying here?

Presumably then, we can safely assume that you cannot answer the question. Just a little word of advice ... please try to use randomly-strung-together words that actually sound like they mean something.

[Jim]

Some people on TNET may be impressed by your ability to string random words together into a sentence (complete with spelling and grammatical errors) but you will have to try much harder here on Geotech ... much much harder.

no...no...no

[Qiaozhi]

Some people on TNET may be impressed by your ability to string random words together into a sentence (complete with spelling and grammatical errors) but you will have to try much harder here on Geotech ... much much harder.

no...no...no

What are you saying "no" to?
That anyone on TNET is even the slightest impressed by Hung's randomly-strung-together words, or that he should try much harder here on Geotech?
Or both?

My guess is that you don't want him to try harder. Probably nobody here wants that!

[Jim]

What are you saying "no" to?
That anyone on TNET is even the slightest impressed by Hung's randomly-strung-together words, or that he should try much harder here on Geotech?
Or both?

My guess is that you don't want him to try harder. Probably nobody here wants that!

That anyone on TreasureNet is even the slightest impressed by hung's randomly strung together words.

[Rudy]

You are a perfect example of the people who has some understanding of science but is unable to think beyond the books they learned at school, also accepting certain things as true without even questioning what it really means.

I'll take that as a compliment coming from you.

This pressure is the result of the 'creator's vibration' over an infinite point within the universe and maintains the atmosphere of all planets. And this is very easy to understand.

If there was such a thing, by virtue of it being a vibration, one would expect it to be compressive during half its cycle and extensive during the other half, with an average of zero, no?

If no constant pressure existed to maintain the 'gaseous cap' that surrounds every Planet, it would expand itself to the vacuum as again, gases pocess the tendency to expand indefinetely.
Remember Torricelli? He did not come up with the conclusion that atmospheric pressure over a given surface is 13.6g X 76cm of the mercury column for nothing. But this pressure is only perceived at sea level. For each 10 meters of elevation, the column drops 1 milimeter. So, theoretically, at 76KM high, there should be no pressure anymore! But aerial currents were observed in variable altitudes. If these currents did not existed you would be smashed by the huge atmospheric pressure.

With all due respect to Torricelli, gravity accounts in large part for our atmosphere. It also helps that our earth has a magnetic dipole that also helps keep our ionized upper atmosphere from being lost, as well as protect us from the solar winds.

Our bodies were created to withstand the atmospheric pressure, indeed, they depend on that pressure for their survival.

It's a repulsion. If there were no repulsion between energy and magnetism, motors would not turn for instance. This same repulsion act in the nebulae. Light repels the magnetic fields, so the 'multitude' of stars from several galaxies provide a great repulsive force in the nebulae's matter making them 'escape' fom each other.
Think. It's known that light weights right? This weight is nothing more than pressure that it exerts over matter. If the Sun attracted, its light would have no weight, but an opposite agent.

Part of what you are saying is solar radiation. The other part is ... nonsense.

If only an atraction force existed, but no repulsion at all, our little planet would come against its own atraction point.
And before you bark that centrifugal force is the cause for this repulsion, Earth would make a spiral smashing itself to the point of atraction.
No, it's not I who state this. It's our friend Math.

Is the repulsion you are talking about the force that keeps nuclei from fusing together?

You and some others here, seem to comprehend electronics and physics to some extent. Actually there are no genius among us.

I am no genius. But I did spend 10 years working with physicists at Bell Telephone Laboratories in a research department. While there, I had the privilege of meeting several fascinating Nobel laureates. People like like Arno Penzias, Bill Shockley and Richard Feynman, who though not a Bell Labs employee, was a frequent guest researcher.

But there is a difference between you people and some of us. Note that I include others here.
You people think that the amount of physics you know accounts sufficiently to explain everything INCLUDING WHAT CANNOT BE.

Not at all. There are many things unexplained in current physics. But I do not take the explanations offered by charlatans, that have no rigorously developed theories backed by impeccable mathematics.

This is stupid. This is idiotic. And this only accounts for the IGNORANCE that reigns here.It should exactly be the opposite. You and others here should be the first ones to state and admit honestly that you are not able to make afirmations about certain apparently unexplained phenomena because the physics you know cannot explain.

To insist on anything else would be stupid and idiotic.

Long range detection of metals is so simple. So silly. Yet you pose this subject as something supernatural.
Poor fellas.

Then explain how its done without a lot of mumbo jumbo. If you have to resort to obscure pseudo-scientific theories from charlatans, that' not good enough. If you don't wish to take Carl's test, then come and visit me in a chauffeured driven Rolls Royce with a suit case full of hard currency. This would make me believe that you have applied those principles and used them to become incredibly wealthy.

[Saturna]

The same 'vibration' the creator in 'his' infinite goodness provides for pathetic creatures such as yourself as an opportunity to come to this world to evolve.

Ahh, yes. Scientific validity and, indeed, reality are always increased when religion is introduced.

[hung]

ll take that as a compliment coming from you.

Thanks. I knew I was right.

If there was such a thing, by virtue of it being a vibration, one would expect it to be compressive during half its cycle and extensive during the other half, with an average of zero, no?

There is no 'if' regarding the primary isotropic cause of all events. And no, what you infer above is absurd. Equilibrium forces to be kept do not allow antagonist periodic cycles.

Part of what you are saying is solar radiation. The other part is ... nonsense.

If you appear to mix the concept of solar radiation with that of sun light pressure, how can you state the rest is nonsense?
This is very typical in brains who cannot process a particular data and emits an escapist comand verbalized.

Is the repulsion you are talking about the force that keeps nuclei from fusing together?

No.
One more evidence that by not understanding the point, a refutal cannot be expressed.

I am no genius. But I did spend 10 years working with physicists at Bell Telephone Laboratories in a research department. While there, I had the privilege of meeting several fascinating Nobel laureates. People like like Arno Penzias, Bill Shockley and Richard Feynman, who though not a Bell Labs employee, was a frequent guest researcher.

Had you spent more time learning from these guys and less time taking pictures of them or talking amenities in fast food locations, you could have had at least an introductory view on vibrational states. Specially with Feynman.
But reading some of your 'beliefs' in a post to Don Jose unfortunately you sure wasted precious time.

Not at all. There are many things unexplained in current physics. But I do not take the explanations offered by charlatans, that have no rigorously developed theories backed by impeccable mathematics.

Finally I agree. But not all of them need to be theories. Just plain observations and common sense.

To insist on anything else would be stupid and idiotic.

Exactly.

Then explain how its done without a lot of mumbo jumbo. If you have to resort to obscure pseudo-scientific theories from charlatans, that' not good enough. If you don't wish to take Carl's test, then come and visit me in a chauffeured driven Rolls Royce with a suit case full of hard currency. This would make me believe that you have applied those principles and used them to become incredibly wealthy.

See? This is what I mean by 'escapist comand verbalized'. You organize ideas in a regular way then all of a sudden spits an incredible BS out of the blue like the one above.
Try to help and be useful to others sometimes.
It's good for the heart and keeps you in tune with the universe.




__________________

[WM6]

The same 'vibration' the creator in 'his' infinite goodness provides for pathetic creatures such as yourself as an opportunity to come to this world to evolve.

It seems that The Creator made some big reset of Universe Vibrator by dowsing rod, just in moment you come to this world.

[Qiaozhi]

That anyone on TreasureNet is even the slightest impressed by hung's randomly strung together words.

This seems to be a universal law. Maybe it's part of Hung Science.

[Jim]

This seems to be a universal law. Maybe it's part of Hung Science.

I'll be willing to go out on a limb here....and simply say Cuckoo For Cocoa Puffs