Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Action of the Earth in solenoids

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Action of the Earth in solenoids

    In a French book of Physics (translate to Spanish) by J. Langlebert, doctor in Medicine and professor of Nature Sciences and Physics, of 1911, you can found the action of the Earth in solenoids, page 394. This is, when you connect to the batteries a solenoid wich pivots in a receptacle with mercury (for to stablish well contact), the extremes "watch" one to North and other to South.

    The pole wich "watch" to the North is called austral and the pole wich "watch" to the South is called boreal.

    Ok, this acts as a compass.

    Well, in the same way you can design a system wich can "watch" to desirable target...

    I inform about this experiment to Alonso and he rapidly understand the theme. He design a LRL wich consist in a movable electrical pendulum with 5,000 ohms in coil and some other things inside. Once, was found a gold ring at 105 m distance and buried 50 cm depth, approximative. This is an example.

    When you are near the target you put on a microvoltmeter based on the internal solenoid of the pendulum and you move the pendulum in the place. The exact point is confirmed when the pendulum move (with his coil, the sensor) a motor and the antenna...

    The system also uses a 1,000 V, HV (inside pendulum).

    So, is not impossible to build a "divining modern rod".
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Esteban,

    One important factor also is that the metal buried acts as a voltage stream concentrator.

    We have surveys that show around 10-¹² volts at location, but when metal is buried, this rises up to 1000000000 volts.
    All voltage streams are redirected to the metal.

    PS. My friend is being sucessful in replicating your ferrite circuit we discussed. He enhanced it even more, by implementing a spectrometer software program to the detector linked to his laptop.
    "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by hung View Post
      We have surveys that show around 10-¹² volts at location, but when metal is buried, this rises up to 1000000000 volts.
      All voltage streams are redirected to the metal.
      You are a comedian.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
        You are a comedian.
        ...in search for an audience.

        Hung , i may be wrong of course, but i think there is just one zero too much.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by hung View Post
          ......
          We have surveys that show around 10-¹² volts at location, but when metal is buried, this rises up to 1000000000 volts.
          All voltage streams are redirected to the metal.
          ........
          From 1 picoVolt to 1 TeraVolt ??? Ha Ha Ha

          Hung, you have blown whatever credibility you had left.

          HH Rudy,
          MXT, HeadHunter Wader


          Do or do not. There is no try.
          Yoda

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Fred View Post
            ...in search for an audience.

            Hung , i may be wrong of course, but i think there is just one zero too much.
            Yes Fred. You are correct. I made a mistake. There's one zero too much.

            Also it's not volts, it's mho/m! 100,000,000 mho/m. That's what we found.
            Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. I begin to appear like Ozzy with the paper bag in his head above.

            In fact, I remember that I came to know once of a scientific study conducted about the dowsing subject where a map of electric condutivity of the region/area where the test was performed was measured. With no metal buried, it was an average of 10-³ mho/m. These values were not enough to make the rods move as there was no significant changes in the electric condutivity.
            But when a conductive metal was buried, some large gradient of electric condutivity was estabilished. The current moved towards the mean of higher condutivity. So for a metal of say 1 000 000 mho/m this provided more than 1 billion mho/m of difference, being sufficient to generate a DOP which made the rods move, aligning with the surface as a short in the 'conection'.
            "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hung View Post
              Yes Fred. You are correct. I made a mistake. There's one zero too much.

              Also it's not volts, it's mho/m! 100,000,000 mho/m.

              You need to be more careful when you cut and paste other people's words from the internet.
              Perhaps your paper bag is blocking the view.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post

                You need to be more careful when you cut and paste other people's words from the internet.
                Perhaps your paper bag is blocking the view.
                There was no cut and paste from our above survey Ozzy, as this phenomenon is even known by Mineoro for a long time.

                But you are right. I should be more careful not making dumb mistakes anymore otherwise my posts will be just like your PD schematics, full of errors.
                Thanks for pointing that up.
                "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by hung View Post
                  Also it's not volts, it's mho/m! 100,000,000 mho/m. That's what we found.
                  What is mho/m ?
                  Do you mean Mohm/m ? (MΩ/m = 1.000.000.000 mΩ/m, i have found where all your zeros come from )
                  Was Kafka one of you parents?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fred View Post
                    What is mho/m ?
                    Do you mean Mohm/m ? (MΩ/m = 1.000.000.000 mΩ/m, i have found where all your zeros come from )
                    Was Kafka one of you parents?
                    No Fred, it's a conductivity unit.
                    I thought Siemens and wrote voltage. But mistaking conductivity for resistance... ouch.
                    "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What is Dowsing???

                      Hung, the sniping on this site re the LRL's is very entertaining. I was outside just before doing some gardening and I had a think about all this stuff about dowsing...are all the sceptics here admitting that dowsing is an accepted phenomena? Are thay saying that i can use my mindpower to twist a long aerial? This is unbelievable for a scientific forum!!! How many people on this site believe in this mind over matter???can we have some reponses please??

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by hipopp View Post
                        Hung, the sniping on this site re the LRL's is very entertaining. I was outside just before doing some gardening and I had a think about all this stuff about dowsing...are all the sceptics here admitting that dowsing is an accepted phenomena? Are thay saying that i can use my mindpower to twist a long aerial? This is unbelievable for a scientific forum!!! How many people on this site believe in this mind over matter???can we have some reponses please??
                        Dowsing is a "trick of the mind". People who believe in dowsing are being self-deluded, because the act of dowsing can be quite compelling.

                        I suggest that you look at this website to learn the ugly truth ->

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by hung View Post
                          No Fred, it's a conductivity unit.
                          I thought Siemens and wrote voltage. But mistaking conductivity for resistance... ouch.
                          Hung,
                          Why are you using a conductivity unit (siemens) in air , wich is one of the best isolator, instead of resistivity ?
                          That´s strange...i could not think of air as a conductor

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                            Dowsing is a "trick of the mind". People who believe in dowsing are being self-deluded, because the act of dowsing can be quite compelling.
                            See Hipopp? This is one example of the 'pearls' the 'I wannabe scientist' stunts fire once in a while about subjects they completely ignore.

                            Excuse the inconvenience.
                            "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Fred View Post
                              Hung,
                              Why are you using a conductivity unit (siemens) in air , wich is one of the best isolator, instead of resistivity ?
                              That´s strange...i could not think of air as a conductor
                              The measurment was not done in air. It was done in the ground.
                              The vector current (I) was used as conductivity for electric field intensity. Affected also by tellurics, when a metal is buried, the streams run towards the metal, increasing the flow of electric current, hence the difference in value.
                              For a resistive object, it flows around it.
                              "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X