Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nick_f
    replied
    If you want to see how serious and well prepared are some of the manufacturers of LRL, you can check this pdf document:



    Note all the fancy terms to describe the operation ("Ultrasonic Long Range Locator", based on "forward gauss technology"), with ultrasonic frequencies of 400-3000 MHz ± 150 kHz (note how they are not aware of the correct notations for MHz and kHz). Anybody who knows just a bit about ultrasonic frequencies, can only have a condescending smile about the frequency range mentioned. How about linking two completely different physical processes such as acoustical and magnetic flux?
    I didn't know (until now) that all metals "scream" in ultrasonic frequencies...

    How about the detecting depth? Who would dig 30 meters to check if there is some gold nugget at that depth, based on the indication of a LRL?
    If the instrument doesn't provide information about the estimated depth and mass of the metal, it would be absolutely useless anyway.

    With a standard detector, at least one knows that no matter if it is a nugget, a piece of iron or a hot rock, they wouldn't have to dig much further than 50cm.

    Also, note the lack of information about the bottom two lights on the box. They have some text in Chinese, but they didn't bother to provide a translation in English, nor an explanation in the instruction manual.

    Well, this is just one typical example of the bull**** surrounding LRL

    Regards,
    Nicolae






    Leave a comment:


  • nick_f
    replied
    Originally posted by WM6 View Post
    Nicolae, please don't joking, this is a serious tread.
    Yes, let's be serious, people who want to detect metals stay away from LRL stuff. There isn't even ONE documented find with LRL under proper test conditions.
    All the circuit diagrams are created by people with little electronics knowledge (all who have the knowledge wouldn't waste time attempting to build LRL).
    How many major manufacturers of metal detectors are involved in research in LRL? The answer is less than one.
    LRL are in the same category as Perpetuum Mobile and Over-unity Generators or Free Energy Generators. It's fun to read about all these though.

    Regards,
    Nicolae

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred
    replied
    Yes, please be serious we are trying to debunker sckqephtics and it is hard enough without scientifically correct jokers making their comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • WM6
    replied
    Nicolae, please don't joking, this is a serious tread.

    Leave a comment:


  • nick_f
    replied
    Originally posted by J_Player View Post
    Hi Fred,
    The problem is all the gold artifacts inside your house are causing the antenna to give signals stronger than the signals from buried treasure. If you can't move your antenna, then you should shield your gold items in your house so you can detect new treasures. You can wrap all your gold items in platinum foil or screening (make sure the platinum shields are grounded to earth ground). This will effectively shield the gold signal from the antenna. When finished with shielding the gold inside your house, then replace the gold coax connectors at the antenna with aluminum or stainless steel. And also be careful if you have any gold fillings in your teeth. If you cannot have your gold fillings removed, then shield them with platinum foil too. Any remaining signals you pick up will be from new treasure, not from interferences.

    Hope this helps.

    Best wishes,
    J_P
    Wow, you mean a LRL won't be able to detect treasures burried in the ground, if they are covered with platinum foil??? Isn't platinum foil a treasure in its own right? I bet it is more expensive than gold itself!

    I like the advice to shield your gold fillings with platinum foil! Don't forget to ground the foil to the ground!

    Regards,
    Nicolae

    Leave a comment:


  • Max
    replied
    Originally posted by WM6 View Post
    Are you planning to attend a remote sensonic carnival in Rio de Janeiro?
    Dr Best will be there and you can exchange experiences.
    Hi,
    yes I will be there too... looking for chicks...

    Uhm, I wanna first meet Dr Best there to discuss about the latest developments of his projects, and antennas....

    Then I will go for chicks.

    First duty then the pleasure....

    Midnight... is all night!


    Kind regards,
    Max

    Leave a comment:


  • WM6
    replied
    Originally posted by Max View Post

    I'm planning further development using Dr. Best's latest patch for the pyramidal logaritmic single chip antenna.

    Kind regards,
    Max
    Are you planning to attend a remote sensonic carnival in Rio de Janeiro?
    Dr Best will be there and you can exchange experiences.

    Leave a comment:


  • Max
    replied
    Originally posted by J_Player View Post
    Hi Max,
    Did you put a SQUID amplifier in the first stage with cyrogenic SiGe transistors? If you did, how many channels did you use?
    Did you use time multiplexing before sending the SQUID signals to the ambient temperature amplifiers and filters with all the presets?

    Best wishes,
    J_P
    Hi JP,
    I use a cryogenic module to make amplification and impedance separation between squid section and the room temperature data acquisition hardware.

    The cryogenic amplifier is made around an OPA350 ic running at -196°C using liquid nitrogen inside dewar insulated vacuum flask.

    The device has its output connected to a fast sample/hold and 8 way, 16-bit ADC made by analog devices and then the signals are routed to the system memory bank , as said an SD card of 512MB capacity.

    The 16-bit adc allow the creation of 8 separate channels , each of one is monitored by software/firmware of MCU to provide reliable graphical and numerical informations to the user.

    The time multiplexing is implemented directly at squid level, using time slots defined in the MCU software. The squid interface is driven by a fiber-optic link to avoid cross noise with the analog signal from preamp, cause of the strict positioning required by cables to the dewar container, that must be as small as possible to avoid eccessive boiling of the coolant fluid...

    I'm planning further development using Dr. Best's latest patch for the pyramidal logaritmic single chip antenna.

    Kind regards,
    Max

    Leave a comment:


  • J_Player
    replied
    Originally posted by Max
    I made all Dr. Best's projects, but with many modifications.

    I added ferrite from Esteban-Alonso secret files, also I added 1/4 dipole antenna and parabolic reflector. I added also electrostatic conductive shield in the back of the antenna, and of course, I use a microcontroller thing (atmel stuff) to collect data arriving by receivers (more than one). The internal ADC of the atmel let me digitize data and colect over a simple SD memory card 512MB.

    The device has about 200 presets now , and I can switch from one to the other just with a few clicks (I equipped the thing with an LCD 20x4 and made a menu for options...).

    The idea is mixing various signals and use which in that particular scenario is more promising. I plan to add magnetometer sensors in differential gradiometer configuration, I wanna emulate EPE mag stuff and integrate with actual thing. I plan also to add an ultra fast ADC and lock-in-amplifier for faint RFLR front end, as well as a graphical interface (I'm thinking at sony PSP stuff loaded with linux and openGL directives/program to generate real time visual display of signals received, like happens in some OKM things)

    The core part is made all around the single chip antenna , but , as said there are many add-ons.

    Still lot of work to do, but I think I will break 1 mile detection very soon.

    Kind regards,
    Max
    Hi Max,
    Did you put a SQUID amplifier in the first stage with cyrogenic SiGe transistors? If you did, how many channels did you use?
    Did you use time multiplexing before sending the SQUID signals to the ambient temperature amplifiers and filters with all the presets?

    Best wishes,
    J_P

    Leave a comment:


  • Max
    replied
    Originally posted by GOLDENSKULL View Post
    Hi Max,

    Did you build dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL ?
    Did you get any result with building it to detect remote signals...?
    I made all Dr. Best's projects, but with many modifications.

    I added ferrite from Esteban-Alonso secret files, also I added 1/4 dipole antenna and parabolic reflector. I added also electrostatic conductive shield in the back of the antenna, and of course, I use a microcontroller thing (atmel stuff) to collect data arriving by receivers (more than one). The internal ADC of the atmel let me digitize data and colect over a simple SD memory card 512MB.

    The device has about 200 presets now , and I can switch from one to the other just with a few clicks (I equipped the thing with an LCD 20x4 and made a menu for options...).

    The idea is mixing various signals and use which in that particular scenario is more promising. I plan to add magnetometer sensors in differential gradiometer configuration, I wanna emulate EPE mag stuff and integrate with actual thing. I plan also to add an ultra fast ADC and lock-in-amplifier for faint RFLR front end, as well as a graphical interface (I'm thinking at sony PSP stuff loaded with linux and openGL directives/program to generate real time visual display of signals received, like happens in some OKM things)

    The core part is made all around the single chip antenna , but , as said there are many add-ons.

    Still lot of work to do, but I think I will break 1 mile detection very soon.

    Kind regards,
    Max

    Leave a comment:


  • Theseus
    replied
    Originally posted by Esteban View Post
    Again, do you understand? Is a joke!
    Sometimes it is hard to tell which "claims" are jokes and which are intended to be serious. Many similarities....

    Leave a comment:


  • Esteban
    replied
    Originally posted by GOLDENSKULL View Post
    Hi Max,

    Did you build dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL ?
    Did you get any result with building it to detect remote signals...?
    Again, do you understand? Is a joke!

    Leave a comment:


  • GOLDENSKULL
    replied
    Hi Max,

    Did you build dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL ?
    Did you get any result with building it to detect remote signals...?

    Leave a comment:


  • Max
    replied
    Originally posted by GOLDENSKULL View Post
    Hi aft_72005,

    Did you build dr. Best Ultimate Single Chip Two Antennas LRL ?
    or you build other electrostatic detector ?

    Did you get any result with build LRL or electrostatic detector, yet ?
    I work on a schematic that can detect both negative and positive ions,
    and welcome to anybody to complete it ...!!!
    It's hybrid detector: you detect ions (positive, from buried metals) as long with some RF signal emitted by them.

    Kind regards,
    Max

    Leave a comment:


  • Max
    replied
    Originally posted by GOLDENSKULL View Post
    Hi max,

    I have waiting for your answer...
    Hi,
    which spoof ? sorry for latency, I cannot answer before.

    No, made a different schematic, always using Dr. Best's directives and the log quadratic antenna, plus 1/4 dipole one and internal ferrite.

    But this work just at 1/2 mile distance, not much.

    Best regards,
    Max

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X